이공 계열 교수의 강의 실행에 대한 이해: 문화역사적 활동이론(CHAT)을 활용한 사례연구
An Understanding of Professors' Performance of Teaching in College of Science and Engineering: A Case Study Using the CHAT
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we analyzed professors' performance of teaching in college of science and engineering from the perspective of the CHAT. Two professors volunteered to participate in this study. Their syllabi were collected before the lectures, and their lectures were observedand videotaped. Semi-structured interviews were conducted before and after their lectures. The CHAT components were classified into‘subjects’, ‘objects’, ‘rules’, ‘communities’, ‘division of labor’, and ‘tools’. We extracted the content of six CHAT components fromthe data and constructed the analysis framework based on the extracted contents. The analyses of the results revealed that both professorshad difficulties due to the contradictions among the components of subject, object, rules, and community in the activity system. Bothprofessors used various strategies to relieve the contradiction related to students’ ability, such as inviting students to participate in theirlecture. However the extent of providing opportunities to students to participate was different between two professors. Meanwhile, bothprofessors preferred to continue their own strategies, because they observed positive changes in students’ learning. In other words, thesuccess experiences of two professors influenced their performances of teaching. We discussed some suggestions to improve the qualityof the lecture in the college of science and engineering.
Abstract
In this study, we analyzed professors' performance of teaching in college of science and engineering from the perspective of the CHAT. Two professors volunteered to participate in this study. Their syllabi were collected before the lectures, and their lectures were observedand videotaped. Semi-structured interviews were conducted before and after their lectures. The CHAT components were classified into‘subjects’, ‘objects’, ‘rules’, ‘communities’, ‘division of labor’, and ‘tools’. We extracted the content of six CHAT components fromthe data and constructed the analysis framework based on the extracted contents. The analyses of the results revealed that both professorshad difficulties due to the contradictions among the components of subject, object, rules, and community in the activity system. Bothprofessors used various strategies to relieve the contradiction related to students’ ability, such as inviting students to participate in theirlecture. However the extent of providing opportunities to students to participate was different between two professors. Meanwhile, bothprofessors preferred to continue their own strategies, because they observed positive changes in students’ learning. In other words, thesuccess experiences of two professors influenced their performances of teaching. We discussed some suggestions to improve the qualityof the lecture in the college of science and engineering.
참고문헌 (37)
- 고장완, "대학생의 학습성과와 대학특성 및 학습과정 변인 간의 구조적 관계 분석", 한국교육, 41(1), pp.167~195 (2014), 한국교육개발원[DOI]
- 권성연, "대학수업의 질 제고를 위한 학습자중심교육의 중요도와 실행도 분석 : 교수들의 인식을 중심으로", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 11(1), pp.51~78 (2011), 학습자중심교과교육학회
- 길양숙, "교수의 수업운영 실태에 관한 의견 분석", 한국교원교육연구, 20(1), pp.33~56 (2003), 한국교원교육학회
- 길양숙, "대학의 수업방법과 교수행동에 나타나는 특징", 한국교원교육연구, 28(4), pp.405~428 (2011), 한국교원교육학회[DOI]
- 김남수, "문화역사 활동이론을 통한 1년차 서울형 혁신학교의 수업 혁신 활동의 이해", 열린교육연구, 20(4), pp.359~384 (2012), 한국열린교육학회
- 김진수, "공과대학 교수들의 공학교육 연수실태와 교육요구 분석", 공학교육연구, 11(2), pp.50~64 (2008), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 김태완, "대학에서의 인문학 수업에 대한 교수와 학생의 인식과 우수 인문학 강의 사례 분석", 교육과학연구, 37(1), pp.101~128 (2006), 교육과학연구소
- 민혜리, "수업에 대한 교수의 자기평가와 학생평가의 비교를 통한 공과대학 수업개선 방안 연구", 공학교육연구, 19(3), pp.35~43 (2016), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 민혜리, "공과대학 학생들의 수업에 대한 요구와 만족도에 근거한 공과대학 수업개선 방안 탐색", 공학교육연구, 12(4), pp.38~45 (2009), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 신영화, "공학 수업 동영상 분석을 통한 교수전략 활용 실태", 공학교육연구, 15(6), pp.9~18 (2012), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 안지혜, "좋은 대학수업의 특성에 대한 문화기술적 사례 연구", 열린교육연구, 22(1), pp.163~191 (2014), 한국열린교육학회
- 이석열, "마이크로티칭 적용에서 나타난 신임교수의 수업행위 분석", 교육종합연구, 12(3), pp.105~126 (2014), 교육종합연구원
- 이용숙, "‘우수수업 상’ 수상 교수의 수업유형과 특성에 대한 문화기술적 연구", 교육방법연구, 23(1), pp.175~211 (2011), 한국교육방법학회[DOI]
- 장지영, "공과대학 학생들이 갖추어야 할 실행능력에 대한 공학교수자들의 인식 및 교수활동 실태", 공학교육연구, 19(4), pp.3~13 (2016), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 정은이, "대학에서의 좋은 수업에 대한 교수자와 학습자의 인식", 교육방법연구, 22(3), pp.25~44 (2010), 한국교육방법학회[DOI]
- 최숙영, "중등 과학교사의 융합인재교육(STEAM) 실행에 대한 문화역사적 활동이론(CHAT) 측면에서의 이해", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(6), pp.949~959 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 한문정, "교사의 과학관 학습 실행에 대한 이해: CHAT를 활용한 사례연구", 한국과학교육학회지, 34(1), pp.33~42 (2014), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 홍성연, "대학 강의 개선을 위한 수업컨설팅 사례 분석", 아시아교육연구, 11(3), pp.97~127 (2010), 교육연구소[DOI]
- Anderson, W. A., "Changing the culture of science education at research universities", Science, 331(6014), pp.152~153 (2011)
- Baeten, M., "Using student-centred learning environment to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness", Educational Research Review, 5(3), pp.243~260 (2010)
- Beatty, I. D., "Viewing teacher transformation through the lens of cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT)", Education as Change, 16(2), pp.283~300 (2012)
- Carini, R. M., "Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages", Research in Higher Education, 47(1), pp.1~32 (2006)
- Eick, C. J., "What makes an inquiry‐oriented science teacher? The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice", Science Education, 86(3), pp.401~416 (2002)
- Engeström, Y., "Learning by expanding: An activitytheoretical approach to developmental research" (1987), Orienta-Konsultit
- Engeström, Y., "Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization", Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), pp.133~156 (2001)
- Engeström, Y., "Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges", Educational Research Review, 5(1), pp.1~24 (2010)
- Fraser, S. P., "Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Exploring its usefulness for science lecturers in higher education", Research in Science Education, 46(1), pp.141~161 (2016)
- Freeman, S., "Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), pp.8410~8415 (2014)
- Kaatrakoski, H., "Learning challenges in higher education: an analysis of contradictions within Open Educational Practice", Higher Education, 74(4), pp.599~615 (2017)
- Lajoie, S. P., "Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld", Instructional Science, 29(2), pp.155~186 (2001)
- Robert, J., "Teaching and research at a large university: Case studies of science professors", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(7), pp.937~960 (2017)
- Roth, W. -M., "Redesigning an "urban" teacher education program: An activity theory perspective", Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), pp.108~131 (2002)
- Roth, W. -M., "A tool for changing the world: Possibilities of cultural-historical activity theory to reinvigorate science education", Studies in Science Education, 45(2), pp.131~167 (2009)
- Saka, Y., "Becoming a member of a school community while working toward science education reform: Teacher induction from a cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) perspective", Science Education, 93(6), pp.996~1025 (2009)
- Smith, L. K., "The impact of early life history on teachers' beliefs: in‐school and out‐of‐school experiences as learners and knowers of science", Teachers and teaching, 11(1), pp.5~36 (2005)
- Strauss, A., "Basics of qualitative research: Technique and procedures for developing grounded theory" (1998), Sage
- Yamagata-Lynch, L. C., "Using activity systems analysis to identify inner contradictions in teacher professional development", Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), pp.507~517 (2009)