본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Genome-resolved metagenomics: a game changer for microbiome medicine

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류생화학

초록

Recent substantial evidence implicating commensal bacteria in human diseases has given rise to a new domain in biomedical research: microbiome medicine. This emerging field aims to understand and leverage the human microbiota and derivative molecules for disease prevention and treatment. Despite the complex and hierarchical organization of this ecosystem, most research over the years has relied on 16S amplicon sequencing, a legacy of bacterial phylogeny and taxonomy. Although advanced sequencing technologies have enabled cost-effective analysis of entire microbiota, translating the relatively short nucleotide information into the functional and taxonomic organization of the microbiome has posed challenges until recently. In the last decade, genome-resolved metagenomics, which aims to reconstruct microbial genomes directly from whole-metagenome sequencing data, has made significant strides and continues to unveil the mysteries of various human-associated microbial communities. There has been a rapid increase in the volume of whole metagenome sequencing data and in the compilation of novel metagenome-assembled genomes and protein sequences in public depositories. This review provides an overview of the capabilities and methods of genome-resolved metagenomics for studying the human microbiome, with a focus on investigating the prokaryotic microbiota of the human gut. Just as decoding the human genome and its variations marked the beginning of the genomic medicine era, unraveling the genomes of commensal microbes and their sequence variations is ushering us into the era of microbiome medicine. Genome-resolved metagenomics stands as a pivotal tool in this transition and can accelerate our journey toward achieving these scientific and medical milestones.

Abstract

Recent substantial evidence implicating commensal bacteria in human diseases has given rise to a new domain in biomedical research: microbiome medicine. This emerging field aims to understand and leverage the human microbiota and derivative molecules for disease prevention and treatment. Despite the complex and hierarchical organization of this ecosystem, most research over the years has relied on 16S amplicon sequencing, a legacy of bacterial phylogeny and taxonomy. Although advanced sequencing technologies have enabled cost-effective analysis of entire microbiota, translating the relatively short nucleotide information into the functional and taxonomic organization of the microbiome has posed challenges until recently. In the last decade, genome-resolved metagenomics, which aims to reconstruct microbial genomes directly from whole-metagenome sequencing data, has made significant strides and continues to unveil the mysteries of various human-associated microbial communities. There has been a rapid increase in the volume of whole metagenome sequencing data and in the compilation of novel metagenome-assembled genomes and protein sequences in public depositories. This review provides an overview of the capabilities and methods of genome-resolved metagenomics for studying the human microbiome, with a focus on investigating the prokaryotic microbiota of the human gut. Just as decoding the human genome and its variations marked the beginning of the genomic medicine era, unraveling the genomes of commensal microbes and their sequence variations is ushering us into the era of microbiome medicine. Genome-resolved metagenomics stands as a pivotal tool in this transition and can accelerate our journey toward achieving these scientific and medical milestones.

참고문헌 (185)

  1. Clarridge, J. E., "3rd Impact of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis for identification of bacteria on clinical microbiology and infectious diseases", Clin. Microbiol. Rev, 17, pp.840~862 (2004)[DOI]
  2. Palys, T., "Discovery and classification of ecological diversity in the bacterial world: the role of DNA sequence data", Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol, 47, pp.1145~1156 (1997)[DOI]
  3. Lander, E. S., "Initial impact of the sequencing of the human genome", Nature, 470, pp.187~197 (2011)[DOI]
  4. Hassler, H. B., "Phylogenies of the 16S rRNA gene and its hypervariable regions lack concordance with core genome phylogenies", Microbiome, 10, pp.104~ (2022)[DOI]
  5. Langille, M. G., "Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences", Nat. Biotechnol, 31, pp.814~821 (2013)[DOI]
  6. Human Microbiome Project, C, "Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome", Nature, 486, pp.207~214 (2012)[DOI]
  7. Integrative, H. M. P. R. N. C, "The integrative human microbiome project", Nature, 569, pp.641~648 (2019)[DOI]
  8. Conlon, M. A., "The impact of diet and lifestyle on gut microbiota and human health", Nutrients, 7, pp.17~44 (2014)[DOI]
  9. Parizadeh, M., "The global human gut microbiome: genes, life styles, and diet", Trends Mol. Med, 29, pp.789~801 (2023)[DOI]
  10. Rothschild, D., "Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota", Nature, 555, pp.210~215 (2018)[DOI]
  11. Almeida, A., "A new genomic blueprint of the human gut microbiota", Nature, 568, pp.499~504 (2019)[DOI]
  12. Van Rossum, T., "Diversity within species:interpreting strains in microbiomes", Nat. Rev. Microbiol, 18, pp.491~506 (2020)[DOI]
  13. Zhai, Y., "Open pangenome of Lactococcus lactis generated by a combination of metagenome-assembled genomes and isolate genomes", Front. Microbiol, 13, pp.948138~ (2022)[DOI]
  14. Pavlopoulos, G. A., "Unraveling the functional dark matter through global metagenomics", Nature, 622, pp.594~602 (2023)[DOI]
  15. Baltoumas, F. A., "NMPFamsDB: a database of novel protein families from microbial metagenomes and metatranscriptomes", Nucleic Acids Res (2023)[DOI]
  16. Valles-Colomer, M., "The person-to-person transmission landscape of the gut and oral microbiomes", Nature, 614, pp.125~135 (2023)[DOI]
  17. Schmidt, T. S., "Extensive transmission of microbes along the gastro intestinal tract", Elife, 8 (2019)[DOI]
  18. Brito, I. L., "Examining horizontal gene transfer in microbial communities", Nat. Rev. Microbiol, 19, pp.442~453 (2021)[DOI]
  19. Costea, P. I., "Subspecies in the global human gut microbiome", Mol. Syst. Biol, 13, pp.960~ (2017)[DOI]
  20. Zeevi, D., "Structural variation in the gut microbiome associates with host health", Nature, 568, pp.43~48 (2019)[DOI]
  21. Zahavi, L., "Bacterial SNPs in the human gut microbiome associate with host BMI", Nat. Med, 29, pp.2785~2792 (2023)[DOI]
  22. Zorrilla, F., "metaGEM: reconstruction of genome scale metabolic models directly from metagenomes", Nucleic Acids Res, 49, pp.e126~ (2021)[DOI]
  23. Heinken, A., "Genome-scale metabolic modeling of the human microbiome in the era of personalized medicine", Annu. Rev. Microbiol, 75, pp.199~222 (2021)[DOI]
  24. Simpson, J. T., "The theory and practice of genome sequence assembly", Annu Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet, 16, pp.153~172 (2015)[DOI]
  25. Nurk, S., "metaSPAdes: a new versatile metagenomic assembler", Genome Res, 27, pp.824~834 (2017)[DOI]
  26. Li, D., "MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph", Bioinformatics, 31, pp.1674~1676 (2015)[DOI]
  27. Compeau, P. E., "How to apply de Bruijn graphs to genome assembly", Nat. Biotechnol, 29, pp.987~991 (2011)[DOI]
  28. Churcheward, B., "MAGNETO: an automated workflow for genome-resolved metagenomics", mSystems, 7, pp.e0043222~ (2022)[DOI]
  29. Delgado, L. F., "Evaluating metagenomic assembly approaches for biome-specific gene catalogues", Microbiome, 10, pp.72~ (2022)[DOI]
  30. Sczyrba, A., "Critical assessment of metagenome Interpretation-a bench mark of metagenomics software", Nat. Methods, 14, pp.1063~1071 (2017)[DOI]
  31. Olm, M. R., "dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication", ISME J, 11, pp.2864~2868 (2017)[DOI]
  32. Kim, C. Y., "Human reference gut microbiome catalog including newly assembled genomes from under-represented Asian metagenomes", Genome Med, 13, pp.134~ (2021)[DOI]
  33. Alneberg, J., "Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition", Nat. Methods, 11, pp.1144~1146 (2014)[DOI]
  34. Wu, Y. W., "MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets", Bioinfor matics, 32, pp.605~607 (2016)[DOI]
  35. Kang, D. D., "MetaBAT 2 : an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies", PeerJ, 7, pp.e7359~ (2019)[DOI]
  36. Nissen, J. N., "Improved metagenome binning and assembly using deep variational autoencoders", Nat. Biotechnol, 39, pp.555~560 (2021)[DOI]
  37. Teeling, H., "Application of tetranucleotide frequencies for the assignment of genomic fragments", Environ. Microbiol, 6, pp.938~947 (2004), 938–947, https :
  38. Musto, H., "Genomic GC level, optimal growth temperature, and genome size in prokaryotes", Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun, 347, pp.1~3 (2006)[DOI]
  39. Saeed, I., "Unsupervised discovery of microbial population structure within metagenomes using nucleotide base composition", Nucleic Acids Res, 40, pp.e34~ (2012)[DOI]
  40. Nielsen, H. B., "Identification and assembly of genomes and genetic ele ments in complex metagenomic samples without using reference genomes", Nat. Biotechnol, 32, pp.822~828 (2014)[DOI]
  41. Mattock, J., "A comparison of single-coverage and multi-coverage metagenomic binning reveals extensive hidden contamination", Nat. Methods, 20, pp.1170~1173 (2023)[DOI]
  42. Lindez, P. P., "Adversarial and variational autoencoders improve metage nomic binning", Commun. Biol, 6, pp.1073~ (2023)[DOI]
  43. Liu, C. C., "MetaDecoder: a novel method for clustering metagenomic contigs", Microbiome, 10, pp.46~ (2022)[DOI]
  44. Pan, S., "A deep siamese neural network improves metagenome-assembled genomes in microbiome datasets across different environments", Nat. Commun, 13, pp.2326~ (2022)[DOI]
  45. Hickl, O., "binny: an auto mated binning algorithm to recover high-quality genomes from complex metagenomic datasets", Brief Bioinform, 23 (2022)[DOI]
  46. Wang, Z., "MetaBinner: a high-performance and stand-alone ensemble binning method to recover individual genomes from complex microbial communities", Genome Biol, 24, pp.1~ (2023)[DOI]
  47. Pan, S., "SemiBin2: self-supervised contrastive learning leads to better MAGs for short- and long-read sequencing", Bioinformatics, 39, pp.i21~i29 (2023)[DOI]
  48. Chen, L. X., "Accurate and complete genomes from metagenomes", Genome Res, 30, pp.315~333 (2020)[DOI]
  49. Meyer, F., "Critical assessment of metagenome interpretation: the second round of challenges", Nat. Methods, 19, pp.429~440 (2022)[DOI]
  50. Song, W. Z., "Binning_refiner: improving genome bins through the combination of different binning programs", Bioinformatics, 33, pp.1873~1875 (2017)[DOI]
  51. Sieber, C. M. K., "Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a derepli cation, aggregation and scoring strategy", Nat. Microbiol, 3, pp.836~843 (2018)[DOI]
  52. Uritskiy, G. V., "MetaWRAP-a flexible pipeline for genome-resolved metagenomic data analysis", Microbiome, 6, pp.158~ (2018)[DOI]
  53. Ruhlemann, M. C., "MAGScoT: a fast, lightweight and accurate bin-refinement tool", Bioinformatics, 38, pp.5430~5433 (2022)[DOI]
  54. Chklovski, A., "CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning", Nat. Methods, 20, pp.1203~1212 (2023)[DOI]
  55. Parks, D. H., "CheckM : assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes", Genome Res, 25, pp.1043~1055 (2015)[DOI]
  56. Bowers, R. M., "Minimum information about a single amplified genome(MISAG)and a metagenome-assembled genome(MIMAG)of bacteria and archaea", Nat. Biotechnol, 35, pp.725~731 (2017)[DOI]
  57. Eisenhofer, R., "Impact of microbial genome com pleteness on metagenomic functional inference", ISME Commun, 3, pp.12~ (2023)[DOI]
  58. Cornet, L., "Contamination detection in genomic data: more is not enough", Genome Biol, 23, pp.60~ (2022)[DOI]
  59. Orakov, A., "GUNC: detection of chimerism and contamination in prokar yotic genomes", Genome Biol, 22, pp.178~ (2021)[DOI]
  60. Fullam, A., "proGenomes3: approaching one million accurately and con sistently annotated high-quality prokaryotic genomes", Nucleic Acids Res, 51, pp.D760~D766 (2023)[DOI]
  61. Zeng, S., "A compendium of 32,277 metagenome-assembled genomes and over 80 million genes from the early-life human gut microbiome", Nat. Commun, 13, pp.5139~ (2022)[DOI]
  62. Schoch, C. L., "NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools", Database (Oxford) (2020)[DOI]
  63. Parks, D. H., "GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome based taxonomy", Nucleic Acids Res, 50, pp.D785~D794 (2022)[DOI]
  64. Beiko, R. G., "Microbial malaise: how can we classify the microbiome?", Trends Microbiol, 23, pp.671~679 (2015)[DOI]
  65. Parks, D. H., "A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phy logeny substantially revises the tree of life", Nat. Biotechnol, 36, pp.996~1004 (2018)[DOI]
  66. Chaumeil, P. A., "GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database", Bioinformatics, 36, pp.1925~1927 (2019)[DOI]
  67. Nayfach, S., "New insights from uncultivated genomes of the global human gut microbiome", Nature, 568, pp.505~510 (2019)[DOI]
  68. Castelle, C. J., "Major new microbial groups expand diversity and alter our understanding of the tree of life", Cell, 172, pp.1181~1197 (2018)[DOI]
  69. Dimonaco, N. J., "No one tool to rule them all: prokaryotic gene prediction tool annotations are highly depen dent on the organism of study", Bioinformatics, 38, pp.1198~1207 (2022)[DOI]
  70. Hyatt, D., "Prodigal : prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification", BMC Bioinforma, 11, pp.119~ (2010)[DOI]
  71. Huerta-Cepas, J., "eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogeneti cally annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses", Nucleic Acids Res, 47, pp.D309~D314 (2019)[DOI]
  72. Cantalapiedra, C. P., "eggNOG-mapper v2: functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale", Mol. Biol. Evol, 38, pp.5825~5829 (2021)[DOI]
  73. Gabaldon, T., "Functional and evolutionary implications of gene orthology", Nat. Rev. Genet, 14, pp.360~366 (2013)[DOI]
  74. Quevillon, E., "InterProScan : protein domains identifier", Nucleic Acids Res, 33, pp.W116~W120 (2005)[DOI]
  75. Seemann, T., "Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation", Bioinformatics, 30, pp.2068~2069 (2014)[DOI]
  76. Schwengers, O., "Bakta : rapid and standardized annotation of bacterial genomes via alignment-free sequence identification", Microb. Genom, 7 (2021)[DOI]
  77. Shaffer, M., "DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function", Nucleic Acids Res, 48, pp.8883~8900 (2020)[DOI]
  78. Ruiz-Perez, C. A., "MicrobeAnnotator: a user friendly, comprehensive functional annotation pipeline for microbial genomes", BMC Bioinforma, 22, pp.11~ (2021)[DOI]
  79. Kanehisa, M., "KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes", Nucleic Acids Res, 51, pp.D587~D592 (2023)[DOI]
  80. Gene Ontology, C., "The gene ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine", Nucleic Acids Res, 49, pp.D325~D334 (2021)[DOI]
  81. Mistry, J, "Pfam: the protein families database in 2021", Nucleic Acids Res, 49, pp.D412~D419 (2021)[DOI]
  82. Drula, E., "The carbohydrate-active enzyme database: functions and litera ture", Nucleic Acids Res, 50, pp.D571~D577 (2022)[DOI]
  83. Antimicrobial Resistance, C, "Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis", Lancet, 399, pp.629~655 (2019)[DOI]
  84. Crits-Christoph, A., "Good microbes, bad genes? The dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in the human microbiome", Gut Microbes, 14, pp.2055944~ (2022)[DOI]
  85. Sommer, M. O. A., "Functional characterization of the antibiotic resistance reservoir in the human microflora", Science, 325, pp.1128~1131 (2009)[DOI]
  86. Forster, S. C., "Strain-level characterization of broad host range mobile genetic elements transferring antibiotic resistance from the human microbiome", Nat. Commun, 13, pp.1445~ (2022)[DOI]
  87. Lee, K., "Population-level impacts of antibiotic usage on the human gut microbiome", Nat. Commun, 14, pp.1191~ (2023)[DOI]
  88. Fredriksen, S., "Resistome expansion in disease-associated human gut microbiomes", Microbiome, 11, pp.166~ (2023)[DOI]
  89. Rowan-Nash, A. D., "Antimicrobial resistance gene prevalence in a population of patients with advanced dementia is related to specific pathobionts", iScience, 23, pp.100905~ (2020)[DOI]
  90. Alcock, B. P, "CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database", Nucleic Acids Res, 51, pp.D690~D699 (2023)[DOI]
  91. "Abricate"[URL]
  92. Gibson, M. K., "Improved annotation of antibiotic resistance determinants reveals microbial resistomes cluster by ecology", ISME J, 9, pp.207~216 (2015)[DOI]
  93. Berglund, F., "Identification and reconstruction of novel antibiotic resistance genes from metagenomes", Microbiome, 7, pp.52~ (2019)[DOI]
  94. Arango-Argoty, G., "DeepARG : a deep learning approach for predicting antibiotic resistance genes from metagenomic data", Microbiome, 6, pp.23~ (2018)[DOI]
  95. Wu, J., "PLM-ARG: antibiotic resistance gene identification using a pretrained protein language model", Bioinformatics, 39 (2023)[DOI]
  96. Gschwind, R., "ResFinderFG v2.0: a database of antibiotic resistance genes obtained by functional metagenomics", Nucleic Acids Res, 51, pp.W493~W500 (2023)[DOI]
  97. Bonin, N., "MEGARes and AMR++, v3.0: an updated comprehensive data base of antimicrobial resistance determinants and an improved software pipeline for classification using high-throughput sequencing", Nucleic Acids Res, 51, pp.D744~D752 (2023)[DOI]
  98. Zhang, G., "Porcine antimicrobial peptides: new prospects for ancient molecules of host defense", Vet. Res, 31, pp.277~296 (2000)[DOI]
  99. Huan, Y., "Antimicrobial peptides: classification, design, application and research progress in multiple fields", Front. Microbiol, 11, pp.582779~ (2020)[DOI]
  100. Divyashree, M., "Clinical Applications of Antimicrobial Peptides (AMPs):where do we stand now?", Protein Pept. Lett, 27, pp.120~134 (2020)[DOI]
  101. Garcia-Gutierrez, E., "Gut microbiota as a source of novel antimicrobials", Gut Microbes, 10, pp.1~21 (2019)[DOI]
  102. Ma, Y., "Identification of antimicrobial peptides from the human gut microbiome using deep learning", Nat. Biotechnol, 40, pp.921~931 (2022)[DOI]
  103. Spanig, S., "Encodings and models for antimicrobial peptide classi f ication for multi-resistant pathogens", BioData Min, 12, pp.7~ (2019)[DOI]
  104. Veltri, D., "Deep learning improves antimicrobial peptide recognition", Bioinformatics, 34, pp.2740~2747 (2018)[DOI]
  105. Li, C., "AMPlify: attentive deep learning model for discovery of novel anti microbial peptides effective against WHO priority pathogens", BMC Genomics, 23, pp.77~ (2022)[DOI]
  106. Tettelin, H., "Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Strepto coccus agalactiae : implications for the microbial"pan-genome", Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, pp.13950~13955 (2005)[DOI]
  107. Mira, A., "The bacterial pan-genome:a new paradigm in microbiology", Int. Microbiol, 13, pp.45~57 (2010)[DOI]
  108. Zhu, A., "Inter-individual differences in the gene content of human gut bacterial species", Genome Biol, 16, pp.82~ (2015)[DOI]
  109. Tantoso, E., "To kill or to be killed: pangenome analysis of Escherichia coli strains reveals a tailocin specific for pandemic ST131", BMC Biol, 20, pp.146~ (2022)[DOI]
  110. Holt, K. E., "Genomic analysis of diversity, population structure, virulence, and antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae, an urgent threat to public health", Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 112, pp.E3574~E3581 (2015)[DOI]
  111. Manzano-Morales, S., "Comparison of gene clustering criteria reveals intrinsic uncertainty in pangenome analyses", Genome Biol, 24, pp.250~ (2023)[DOI]
  112. Soria, P. S., "Functional divergence for every paralog", Mol. Biol. Evol, 31, pp.984~992 (2014)[DOI]
  113. Fang, G., "Persistence drives gene clustering in bac terial genomes", BMC Genomics, 9, pp.4~ (2008)[DOI]
  114. Page, A. J., "Roary : rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis", Bioinformatics, 31, pp.3691~3693 (2015)[DOI]
  115. Gautreau, G., "PPanGGOLiN : depicting microbial diversity via a partitioned pangenome graph", PLoS Comput. Biol, 16, pp.e1007732~ (2020)[DOI]
  116. Tonkin-Hill, G., "Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline", Genome Biol, 21, pp.180~ (2020)[DOI]
  117. Li, T., "Critical assessment of pan-genomic analysis of metagenome assembled genomes", Brief Bioinform, 23 (2022)[DOI]
  118. Horsfield, S. T., "Accurate and fast graph-based pangenome annotation and clustering with ggCaller", Genome Res, 33, pp.1622~1637 (2023)[DOI]
  119. Gurbich, T. A., "MGnify genomes : a resource for biome-specific microbial genome catalogues", J. Mol. Biol, 435, pp.168016~ (2023)[DOI]
  120. Almeida, A., "A unified catalog of 204,938 reference genomes from the human gut microbiome", Nat. Biotechnol, 39, pp.105~114 (2021)[DOI]
  121. Leviatan, S., "An expanded reference map of the human gut microbiome reveals hundreds of previously unknown species", Nat. Commun, 13, pp.3863~ (2022)[DOI]
  122. Gounot, J. S., "Genome-centric analysis of short and long read metagen omes reveals uncharacterized microbiome diversity in Southeast Asians", Nat. Commun, 13, pp.6044~ (2022)[DOI]
  123. Jin, H., "A high-quality genome compendium of the human gut microbiome of Inner Mongolians", Nat. Microbiol, 8, pp.150~161 (2023)[DOI]
  124. Ghazi, A. R., "Huttenhower, C. Strain identi f ication and quantitative analysis in microbial communities", J. Mol. Biol, 434, pp.167582~ (2022)[DOI]
  125. Zhao, C., "MIDAS2: meta genomic Intra-species diversity analysis system", Bioinformatics, 39 (2023)[DOI]
  126. Wang, D., "Characterization of gut microbial structural variations as deter minants of human bile acid metabolism", Cell Host Microbe, 29, pp.1802~1814 (2021)[DOI]
  127. Liu, R., "Gut microbial structural variation associates with immune check point inhibitor response", Nat. Commun, 14, pp.7421~ (2023)[DOI]
  128. Treangen, T. J., "The Harvest suite for rapid core-genome alignment and visualization of thousands of intraspecific microbial genomes", Genome Biol, 15, pp.524~ (2014)[DOI]
  129. Truong, D. T., "Microbial strain level population structure and genetic diversity from metagenomes", Genome Res, 27, pp.626~638 (2017)[DOI]
  130. Costea, P. I., "metaSNV : a tool for metagenomic strain level analysis", PLoS One, 12, pp.e0182392~ (2017)[DOI]
  131. Nayfach, S., "An integrated metagenomics pipeline for strain profiling reveals novel patterns of bacterial transmission and biogeography", Genome Res, 26, pp.1612~1625 (2016)[DOI]
  132. Shi, Z. J., "Fast and accurate metagenotyping of the human gut microbiome with GT-Pro", Nat. Biotechnol, 40, pp.507~516 (2022)[DOI]
  133. Chen, B. Y., "Roles of oral microbiota and oral-gut microbial transmission in hypertension", J. Adv. Res, 43, pp.147~161 (2023)[DOI]
  134. Asnicar, F., "Studying vertical microbiome transmission from mothers to infants by strain-level metagenomic profiling", mSystems, 2 (2017)[DOI]
  135. Li, S. S., "Durable coexistence of donor and recipient strains after fecal microbiota transplantation", Science, 352, pp.586~589 (2016)[DOI]
  136. Schmidt, T. S. B., "Drivers and determinants of strain dynamics following fecal microbiota transplantation", Nat. Med, 28, pp.1902~1912 (2022)[DOI]
  137. Ianiro, G., "Variability of strain engraftment and predictability of microbiome composition after fecal microbiota transplantation across different diseases", Nat. Med, 28, pp.1913~1923 (2022)[DOI]
  138. Schloissnig, S., "Genomic variation landscape of the human gut microbiome", Nature, 493, pp.45~50 (2013)[DOI]
  139. Lloyd-Price, J., "Strains, functions and dynamics in the expanded Human Microbiome Project", Nature, 550, pp.61~66 (2017)[DOI]
  140. Vatanen, T., "Genomic variation and strain-specific functional adaptation in the human gut microbiome during early life", Nat. Microbiol, 4, pp.470~479 (2019)[DOI]
  141. Garud, N. R., "Evolutionary dynamics of bacteria in the gut microbiome within and across hosts", PLoS Biol, 17, pp.e3000102~ (2019)[DOI]
  142. Roodgar, M., "Longitudinal linked-read sequencing reveals ecological and evolutionary responses of a human gut microbiome during antibiotic treatment", Genome Res, 31, pp.1433~1446 (2021)[DOI]
  143. Visconti, A., "Interplay between the human gut microbiome and host meta bolism", Nat. Commun, 10, pp.4505~ (2019)[DOI]
  144. Nicholson, J. K., "Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions", Science, 336, pp.1262~1267 (2012)[DOI]
  145. Zhang, Y., "Metabolite interactions between host and microbiota during health and disease: Which feeds the other?", Biomed. Pharmacother, 160, pp.114295~ (2023)[DOI]
  146. Yim, H., "Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for direct production of 1, 4-butanediol", Nat. Chem. Biol, 7, pp.445~452 (2011)[DOI]
  147. Edwards, J. S., "Systems properties of the Haemophilus influenzae Rd metabolic genotype", J. Biol. Chem, 274, pp.17410~17416 (1999)[DOI]
  148. Wang, H., "RAVEN 2.0: a versatile toolbox for metabolic network recon struction and a case study on Streptomyces coelicolor", PLoS Comput. Biol, 14, pp.e1006541~ (2018)[DOI]
  149. Karp, P. D., "Pathway Tools version 19.0 update: software for pathway", genome informatics and systems biology, 2016, pp.17, 877~890
  150. Dias, O., "Reconstructing genome-scale metabolic models with merlin", Nucleic Acids Res, 43, pp.3899~3910 (2015)[DOI]
  151. Seaver, S. M. D., "The ModelSEED Biochemistry Database for the integration of metabolic annotations and the reconstruction, comparison and analysis of metabolic models for plants, fungi and microbes", Nucleic Acids Res, 49, pp.D575~D588 (2021)[DOI]
  152. Henry, C. S., "High-throughput generation, optimization and analysis of genome-scale metabolic models", Nat. Biotechnol, 28, pp.977~982 (2010)[DOI]
  153. Machado, D., "Fast automated recon struction of genome-scale metabolic models for microbial species and commu nities", Nucleic Acids Res, 46, pp.7542~7553 (2018)[DOI]
  154. Zimmermann, J., "gapseq: informed prediction of bac terial metabolic pathways and reconstruction of accurate metabolic models", Genome Biol, 22, pp.81~ (2021)[DOI]
  155. Lieven, C., "MEMOTE for standardized genome-scale metabolic model testing", Nat. Biotechnol, 38, pp.272~276 (2020)[DOI]
  156. Overbeek, R., "The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology(RAST)", Nucleic Acids Res, 42, pp.D206~D214 (2014)[DOI]
  157. Magnusdottir, S., "Generation of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions for 773 members of the human gut microbiota", Nat. Biotechnol, 35, pp.81~89 (2017)[DOI]
  158. Heinken, A., "Genome-scale metabolic reconstruction of 7,302 human microorganisms for personalized medicine", Nat. Biotechnol, 41, pp.1320~1331 (2023)[DOI]
  159. King, Z. A., "BiGG Models : a platform for integrating, standardizing and sharing genome-scale models", Nucleic Acids Res, 44, pp.D515~D522 (2016)[DOI]
  160. UniProt, C., "UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021", Nucleic Acids Res, 49, pp.D480~D489 (2021)[DOI]
  161. Saier, M. H. Jr, "The transporter classification database", Nucleic Acids Res, 42, pp.D251~D258 (2014)[DOI]
  162. Becker, S. A., "Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint based models : the COBRA Toolbox", Nat. Protoc, 2, pp.727~738 (2007)[DOI]
  163. Heinken, A., "Microbiome Modelling Toolbox 2.0: efficient, tractable modelling of microbiome communities", Bioinformatics, 38, pp.2367~2368 (2022)[DOI]
  164. Orth, J. D., "What is flux balance analysis?", Nat. Biotechnol, 28, pp.245~248 (2010)[DOI]
  165. Heirendt, L., "Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models using the COBRA Toolbox v.3.0", Nat. Protoc, 14, pp.639~702 (2019)[DOI]
  166. Jung, T. S., "WEbcoli: an interactive and asynchronous web application for in silico design and analysis of genome scale E.coli model", Bioinformatics, 25, pp.2850~2852 (2009)[DOI]
  167. Lee, S. Y., "MetaFluxNet, a program package for metabolic pathway con struction and analysis, and its use in large-scale metabolic flux analysis of Escherichia coli", Genome Inf, 14, pp.23~33 (2003)
  168. Klamt, S., "Structural and functional analysis of cellular networks with CellNetAnalyzer", BMC Syst. Biol, 1, pp.2~ (2007)[DOI]
  169. Shoaie, S., "Quantifying diet-induced metabolic changes of the human gut microbiome", Cell Metab, 22, pp.320~331 (2015)[DOI]
  170. Bauer, E., "BacArena: individual based metabolic modeling of heterogeneous microbes in complex commu nities", PLoS Comput. Biol, 13, pp.e1005544~ (2017)[DOI]
  171. Zelezniak, A., "Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities", Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 112, pp.6449~6454 (2015)[DOI]
  172. Hertel, J., "Integration of constraint-based modeling with fecal metabolomics reveals large deleterious effects of Fuso bacterium spp. on community butyrate production", Gut Microbes, 13, pp.1~23 (2021)[DOI]
  173. Hertel, J., "Integrated analyses of microbiome and longitudinal metabolome data reveal microbial-host interactions on Sulfur Metabolism in Parkinson’s disease", Cell Rep, 29, pp.1767~1777 (2019)[DOI]
  174. Hale, V. L., "Synthesis of multi-omic data and community metabolic models reveals insights into the role of hydrogen sulfide in colon cancer", Methods, 149, pp.59~68 (2018)[DOI]
  175. Kolodziejczyk, A. A., "Diet-microbiota interactions and personalized nutrition", Nat. Rev. Microbiol, 17, pp.742~753 (2019)[DOI]
  176. Nielsen, J., "Systems biology of metabolism: a driver for developing personalized and precision medicine", Cell Metab, 25, pp.572~579 (2017)[DOI]
  177. Moss, E. L., "Complete, closed bacterial genomes from microbiomes using nanopore sequencing", Nat. Biotechnol, 38, pp.701~707 (2020)[DOI]
  178. Kim, C. Y., "metagenomic sequencing enables assembly of accurate and complete genomes from human gut microbiota", Nat. Commun, 13, pp.6367~ (2022)[DOI]
  179. Abdill, R. J., "Public human microbiome data are dominated by highly developed countries", PLoS Biol, 20, pp.e3001536~ (2022)[DOI]
  180. Feehery, G. R., "A method for selectively enriching microbial DNA from contaminating vertebrate host DNA", PLoS One, 8, pp.e76096~ (2013)[DOI]
  181. Nelson, M. T., "Human and extracellular DNA depletion for metagenomic analysis of complex clinical infection samples yields optimized viable micro biome profiles", Cell Rep, 26, pp.2227~2240 (2019)[DOI]
  182. Marotz, C. A., "Improving saliva shotgun metagenomics by chemical host DNA depletion", Microbiome, 6, pp.42~ (2018)[DOI]
  183. Wu-Woods, N. J., "Microbial-enrichment method enables high-throughput metagenomic characterization from host-rich samples", Nat. Methods, 20, pp.1672~1682 (2023)[DOI]
  184. Heravi, F. S., "Host DNA depletion efficiency of microbiome DNA enrichment methods in infected tissue samples", J. Microbiol. Methods, 170, pp.105856~ (2020)[DOI]
  185. Ahannach, S., "Microbial enrichment and storage for metagenomics of vaginal, skin, and saliva samples", iScience, 24, pp.103306~ (2021)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (218건)