본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

불산 누출사고에 따른 지역사회 구성원들의 노출평가

Exposure Assessment on Sub-Populations of the Local Community following a Hydrofluoric Acid Accident

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to propose an indirect exposure assessment method using aquestionnaire survey at a time when direct exposure assessment would be impossible after a chemical accident. Methods: About two weeks after an accident, a questionnaire survey was performed with 1,264 persons fromthe local community. Variables related to exposure were extracted from the survey contents, weighted and thengraded for comparison with subjective symptoms in order to evaluate the extent of exposure. Survey itemssuitable for reflecting the previous exposure level during the accident were extracted, weighted and divided intoquartile ranges. Subjective symptoms showed an increasing tendency with higher exposure level when comparedwith final exposure level (p<0.01). Results: For the relationship between the final exposure grade and subjective symptoms, as the exposure gradewas increasing the rates complaining of symptom also showed an increasing tendency. However, when adjustedfor demographic characteristics, there was a tendency for the eye irritation symptom to appear higher in women,and respiratory organ irritation appeared higher in smokers. Conclusions: When the problem of recall bias is considered, this study may not have completely unraveledexposure and the characteristics of the participants can affect subjective symptoms. Nevertheless, the exposurerating method of using a questionnaire showed a significant relationship with symptom level. It can be deemedthat assessment of past exposure may be successfully evaluated by questionnaire in cases such as chemicalaccidents.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to propose an indirect exposure assessment method using aquestionnaire survey at a time when direct exposure assessment would be impossible after a chemical accident. Methods: About two weeks after an accident, a questionnaire survey was performed with 1,264 persons fromthe local community. Variables related to exposure were extracted from the survey contents, weighted and thengraded for comparison with subjective symptoms in order to evaluate the extent of exposure. Survey itemssuitable for reflecting the previous exposure level during the accident were extracted, weighted and divided intoquartile ranges. Subjective symptoms showed an increasing tendency with higher exposure level when comparedwith final exposure level (p<0.01). Results: For the relationship between the final exposure grade and subjective symptoms, as the exposure gradewas increasing the rates complaining of symptom also showed an increasing tendency. However, when adjustedfor demographic characteristics, there was a tendency for the eye irritation symptom to appear higher in women,and respiratory organ irritation appeared higher in smokers. Conclusions: When the problem of recall bias is considered, this study may not have completely unraveledexposure and the characteristics of the participants can affect subjective symptoms. Nevertheless, the exposurerating method of using a questionnaire showed a significant relationship with symptom level. It can be deemedthat assessment of past exposure may be successfully evaluated by questionnaire in cases such as chemicalaccidents.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Gumi City., "Gumi City, Report of explosion accident in HUBE Global Inc" (2012), Gumi City Press
  2. Yang WH., "Case study of Gumi chemical accident and future study", Symposium in Chemical Safety Press (2014)
  3. Wing JS, "Acute health effects in a community after a release of hydrofluoric acid", Arch Environ Health, 46(3), pp.155~160 (1991)
  4. Dayal HH, "A community based epidemiologic study of health sequelae of exposure to hydrofluoric acid", Ann Epidemiol, 2(3), pp.213~230 (1992)
  5. Dayal HH, "Hazardous chemicals: psychological dimensions of the health sequelae of a community exposure in Texas", J Epidemiol Community Health, 48(6), pp.560~568 (1994)
  6. Nieuwenhuijsen M, "New developments in exposure assessment:the impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiology studies", Environ Int, 32(8), pp.996~1009 (2006)
  7. Manini P, "Exposure assessment at the workplace: implications of biological variability", Toxicol Lett, 168(3), pp.210~218 (2007)
  8. National Institute for Chemical Studies, "Effectiveness of shelter-in-place: examples from across the country", pp.304~6264 (1961), NICS Press
  9. Levenson M, "Is evacuation the best policy?", Science, 208(4440), pp.131~132 (1980)
  10. World Health Organization., "Guideline for air quality, World Health Organization document" (2000), WHO Press
  11. Liu W, "Predicting personal exposure to airborne carbonyls using residential measurements and time", activity data, 2007, pp.41(25), 5280~5288
  12. Sexon K, "Estimating volatile organic compound concentration in selected microenvironments using time-activity and personal exposure data", J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70(5), pp.465~467 (2007)
  13. Hydrofluoric acid (HF), priority existing chemical assessment report, "National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme", NICNAS Press, ~ (2001)
  14. Fluorides, "Environmental Health Criteria", pp.227~ (2002), WHO Press
  15. Canadian Transport Emergency Centre, "Emergency response guidebook" (2012), CANUTEC Press
  16. Forsberg B, "People can detect poor air quality well below guideline concentrations:a prevalence study of annoyance reactions and air pollution from traffic", Occup Environ Med, 54(1), pp.44~48 (1997)
  17. Hoppe P, "Indoor climate and air quality", Int J Biometeorol, 42, pp.1~7 (1998)
  18. Klaeboe R, "Oslo traffic study-part 1: an integrated approach to assess the combined effects of noise and air pollution on annoyance", Atmos Environ, 34(27), pp.4727~4736 (2000)
  19. American Industrial Hygiene Association., "Guideline on occupational exposure reconstruction" (2008), AIHA Press
  20. Daval B, "Prostate cancer risk and exposure to ultraviolet radiation: further support for the protective effect of sunlight", Cancer Letters, 192(31), pp.145~149 (2003)
  21. National Institute of Environmental Research., "Emergency Response Guidebook" (2012), NIER Press
  22. 이경무, "건강근로자효과의 최소화 방안과 보정 방법", 한국환경보건학회지, 37(5), pp.342~347 (2011), 한국환경보건학회

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)