자기조절의 과정에서 나타나는 과학영재학생과 일반학생의 두뇌 활성과 사고 과정 비교 – fNIRS 연구
Comparison of Science Gifted and General Students’ Brain Activity and Thinking Process in the Process of Self-regulation – An fNIRS Study
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Self-regulation is the process of generating new alternative schemas that can be re-equilibriated through feedback and accommodation of observed information and the existing disquilibriated schemas. The purpose of this study was to compare neurocognitive thinking processes in two groups based on brain activity data from scientific gifted and general students’ self-regulation process during taking mirror-writing tasks. As a result of the study, the OFC area, where activities appear in the process of performing self-regulating tasks in common with science gifted students, is an area that has the function of predicting errors and determining success or failure. This means that self-regulation is taking place to anticipate the outcome of an action and to continuously check whether it is consistent with the actual results. In addition, comparing brain activity in assimilation, conflict, and accommodation processes that subdivide the process of self-regulation, we found that there were differences between processes and groups. In particular, the DLPFC area, where activities appear during the conflict process and accommodation process that strive to form an alternative schematic, is an area that has the function of manipulating information in the working memory. This means that efforts are being made to reach equilibrium through attempts to integrate information for problem solving and one's strategy. The findings of this study may be used as relevant data for education that can enhance self-regulation for gifted education for all, while also being as data on neurological methods used as a verification tool to support research in cognitive psychology.
Abstract
Self-regulation is the process of generating new alternative schemas that can be re-equilibriated through feedback and accommodation of observed information and the existing disquilibriated schemas. The purpose of this study was to compare neurocognitive thinking processes in two groups based on brain activity data from scientific gifted and general students’ self-regulation process during taking mirror-writing tasks. As a result of the study, the OFC area, where activities appear in the process of performing self-regulating tasks in common with science gifted students, is an area that has the function of predicting errors and determining success or failure. This means that self-regulation is taking place to anticipate the outcome of an action and to continuously check whether it is consistent with the actual results. In addition, comparing brain activity in assimilation, conflict, and accommodation processes that subdivide the process of self-regulation, we found that there were differences between processes and groups. In particular, the DLPFC area, where activities appear during the conflict process and accommodation process that strive to form an alternative schematic, is an area that has the function of manipulating information in the working memory. This means that efforts are being made to reach equilibrium through attempts to integrate information for problem solving and one's strategy. The findings of this study may be used as relevant data for education that can enhance self-regulation for gifted education for all, while also being as data on neurological methods used as a verification tool to support research in cognitive psychology.
참고문헌 (34)
- Ablard, K. E., "Self-regulated learning in high-achieving students : Relations to advanced reasoning, achievement", Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, pp.94~101 (1998)
- Ballesta, S., "Values Encoded in Orbitofrontal Cortex Are Causally Related to Economic Choices", ~ (2020)
- Bechara, A., "Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex", Cerebral cortex, 10, pp.295~307 (2000)
- Bunce, S. C., "Functional near-infrared spectroscopy: An emerging neuroimaging modality", IEEE Enginering in medicine and biology magazine, pp.54~62 (2006)
- Corno, L., "The metacognitive control components of self-regulated learning", Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, pp.333~346 (1986)
- Dai, D. Y., "Three paradigms of gifted education : In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice", Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, pp.151~168 (2013)
- Davis, G. A., "Education of the Gifted and Talented" (2004), Allyn & Bacon
- Fischer, J. P., "Mirror writing in typically developing children : A first longitudinal study", Cognitive Development, 38, pp.114~124 (2016)
- Fox, P. T., "Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiologic neural activity", Science, 241, pp.462~464 (1988)
- Goldberg, F. M., "Student difficulties in understanding image formation by a plane mirror", The Physics Teacher, 24, pp.472~481 (1986)
- Hughes, S. J., "Comprehensive assessment must play a role in RTI, Neuropsychological perspectives on learning disabilities in the era of RTI: Recommendations for Diagnosis and Intervention", 115~130 (2008)
- 장정은, "과학 영재들의 과제집착력 특성 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(1), pp.1~16 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- Koechlin, E., "Anterior prefrontal function and the limits of human decision-making", Science, 318, pp.594~598 (2007)
- 권승혁, "거울 과제에 대한 자기조절 과정의 fNIRS 두뇌 활성 규명과 딥러닝 기반 예측 모델 탐색", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 10(4), pp.365~376 (2020), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
- Kwon, Y. J., "Changes in brain activation induced by the training of hypothesis generation skills: An fMRI study", Brain and Cognition, 69, pp.391~397 (2009)
- Lawson, A. E., "Using chemistry problems to provoke self-regulation", Journal of Chemical Education, 54, pp.41~ (1977)
- Lawson, A. E., "Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking" (1995), Wadsworth Publishing Company
- Lawson, A. E, "The Neurological Basis of Learning, Development and Discovery" (2003), Springer
- Mars, R., "Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, working memory, and prospective coding for action", The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, pp.1801~1802 (2007)
- Murphy, D., "Functional neuroanatomical dissociation of verbal, visual and spatial working memory", Schizophrenia Research, 29, pp.105~106 (1998)
- O'Doherty, J. P., "Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain", Neuron, 38, pp.329~337 (2003)
- 박상희, "교육연구에서 f-NIRS의 실제 측정과 적용을 통한 두뇌 연구의 탐색", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 9(3), pp.213~231 (2019), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
- Pinti, P., "A review on the use of wearable functional near-infrared spectroscopy in naturalistic environments", Japanese Psychological Research, 60, pp.347~373 (2018)
- Risemberg, R., "Self-regulated learning in gifted students", Roper Review, 15, pp.98~101 (1992)
- Ritchotte, J. A., "The validity of the aachievement-orientation model for gifted middle school students: An exploratory study", Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, pp.183~198 (2014)
- Rogers, K. B., "Do the Gifted Think and Learn Differently? A Review of Recent Research and Its Implications for Instruction" (1986), ERIC Clearinghouse
- Shuvra, L. T., "Analysis of hemodynamic response function using fNIRS", International Conference on Innovation in Engineering and Technology, pp.1~6 (2018)
- Siegle, D., "Making a difference : Motivating gifted students who are not achieving", Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, pp.22~27 (2005)
- Soltanlou, M., "Applications of functional near-infrared spectroscopy(fNIRS)in studying cognitve development : The case of mathematics and language", Frontiers in Psychology, 9, pp.27~ (2018)
- Tak, S., "Statistical analysis of fNIRS data : A comprehensive review", Neuroimage, 85, pp.72~91 (2014)
- Vohs, K. D., "Handbook of Self-regulation" (2004), Guilford Press
- Wallis, J. D., "Orbitofrontal cortex and its contribution to decision-making", Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, pp.31~56 (2007)
- Xia, M., "BrainNet viewer: A network visualization tool for human brain connectomics", PloS one, 8, pp.e68910~ (2013)
- Ye, J. C., "NIRS-SPM: Statistical parametric mapping for nearinfrared spectroscopy", NeuroImage, 44, pp.428~447 (2009)