본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고등학교 듣기평가 어휘 사용 양상에 대한 코퍼스 기반 연구

A Corpus-Based Study on Vocabulary Use in English Listening Tests for High School Students

이동주|박명호
뇌·AI기반교육연구소 (Institute of Brain·AI based Education)|2021.09|Brain, Digital, & Learning|제11권 제3호|pp. 447-468|DOI https://doi.org/10.31216/BDL.20210029

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

lexical bundlesCSATlistening testvocabulary usedelexical verbs

초록

The aim of this study is to analyze the use of English vocabulary in English listening tests for high school students. This study analyzed single words, lexical bundles, and delexical verb collocations in the listening test scripts of CSAT, GSAT and GLT from the year of 2011 to 2020. The corpora were constructed with 210 listening test scripts. The investigation of single words first showed that test items under 2009 Revised National Curriculum used almost 20% of words that were not in the basic word lists, which means test items used much more difficult vocabulary than those National Curriculum guided. However, under the 2015 Revised National Curriculum, all test items used 10% of words not in the lists. Second, the word ‘go’, ‘good’, ‘look’ have appeared most frequently in all listening tests regardless of the school grade. The investigation of lexical bundles reveals that stance function bundles were used most frequently in GSAT, and GLT, but in CSAT, special function bundles (i.e., inquiry function) were used more than stance function bundles. In GSAT, the frequency of stance bundles increases as the school grade of test-takers rises. Overall, lots of lexical bundles were used in common among tests irrespective of test takers’ school grades. Lastly, the analysis of delexical verb collocations shows that delexical verb+noun collocations in GSAT were markedly less used than those in other listening tests. Especially in the case of the verb ‘have’, have+noun collocations were used only about 9% of the verb’s overall occurrence in the whole texts. The findings show there is unbalance in the use of delexical verbs in listening tests and there is no hierarchy in the use of delexical verbs in relation to the school grade of the test takers. These results provide meaningful implications to teachers in teaching English listening skills and developing listening test items.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the use of English vocabulary in English listening tests for high school students. This study analyzed single words, lexical bundles, and delexical verb collocations in the listening test scripts of CSAT, GSAT and GLT from the year of 2011 to 2020. The corpora were constructed with 210 listening test scripts. The investigation of single words first showed that test items under 2009 Revised National Curriculum used almost 20% of words that were not in the basic word lists, which means test items used much more difficult vocabulary than those National Curriculum guided. However, under the 2015 Revised National Curriculum, all test items used 10% of words not in the lists. Second, the word ‘go’, ‘good’, ‘look’ have appeared most frequently in all listening tests regardless of the school grade. The investigation of lexical bundles reveals that stance function bundles were used most frequently in GSAT, and GLT, but in CSAT, special function bundles (i.e., inquiry function) were used more than stance function bundles. In GSAT, the frequency of stance bundles increases as the school grade of test-takers rises. Overall, lots of lexical bundles were used in common among tests irrespective of test takers’ school grades. Lastly, the analysis of delexical verb collocations shows that delexical verb+noun collocations in GSAT were markedly less used than those in other listening tests. Especially in the case of the verb ‘have’, have+noun collocations were used only about 9% of the verb’s overall occurrence in the whole texts. The findings show there is unbalance in the use of delexical verbs in listening tests and there is no hierarchy in the use of delexical verbs in relation to the school grade of the test takers. These results provide meaningful implications to teachers in teaching English listening skills and developing listening test items.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 안지현, "A Corpus-Based Classification of Lexical Bundles in Business Email", 언어과학, 27(4), pp.147~166 (2020), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  2. "AntConc 4.0: Freeware corpus analysis toolkit" (2020)[URL]
  3. Biber, D., "Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers", English for Specific Purpose, 26, pp.263~286 (2007)
  4. Biber, D., "If you look at : Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks", Applied Linguistics, 25, pp.371~405 (2004)
  5. Biber, D., "Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English" (1999), Longman
  6. 최민석, "영어과 교육과정, 대학수학능력시험, EBS 교재의 코퍼스 기반 어휘 분석", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 10(3), pp.257~270 (2020), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
  7. 최원경, "A Corpus-Based Study on “Delexical Verb + Noun” Collocations Made by Korean Learners of English", Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(1), pp.279~293 (2019), 아시아테플
  8. Conrad, M., "The frequency and use of lexical bundles in conversation and academic prose", Lexicographica : International Annual for Lexicography, 20, pp.56~71 (2005)
  9. Cortes, V., "Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology", English for Specific Purposes, 23, pp.397~423 (2004)
  10. Cortes, V., "The purpose of this study is to : Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions", Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, pp.33~43 (2013)
  11. Ellis, N. C., "Formulaic language and second language acquisition : Zipf and phrasal teddy bear", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, pp.17~44 (2012)
  12. 고광윤, "영어 경동사 Have와 Take의 변이에 대한 코퍼스 기반 연구", 영어학연구, 21(1), pp.1~27 (2015), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  13. Howarth, P., "Phraseology in English Academic Writing: Some Implications for Language Learning and Dictionary Making" (1996), Niemeyer
  14. Hyland, K., "As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation", English for Specific Purposes, 27, pp.4~21 (2008)
  15. 장한길, "코퍼스를 기반으로 한 고등학교 영어 교과서 읽기 · 듣기 자료의 어휘 분석", 언어연구, 34(2), pp.261~286 (2018), 한국현대언어학회[DOI]
  16. 전성애, "대학수학능력시험(영어시험)의 문항개선에 대한 연구", 영어어문교육, 18(2), pp.189~211 (2012), 한국영어어문교육학회[DOI]
  17. 강지은, "고등학교 영어 듣기 지문의 Lexical Bundles 분석: 교과서, 수능, EBS 교재를 중심으로", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 16(12), pp.271~294 (2016), 학습자중심교과교육학회[DOI]
  18. "A report on 2021 college scholastic ability test" (2020)[URL]
  19. 김동연, "중학교 영어교과서 듣기활동과 전국영어듣기평가 문항 비교분석", 언어학 연구, (54), pp.407~427 (2020), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
  20. 김미진, "2015 개정 영어과 교육과정 성취기준에 반영된 교과역량 특성 분석", 교과교육학연구, 23(2), pp.108~117 (2019), 교과교육연구소[DOI]
  21. 김태희, "EBS 및 서울시 중학교 영어듣기시험의 비교 분석", 영어평가, 13(1), pp.41~84 (2018), 한국영어평가학회[DOI]
  22. 이병천, "영어교과 평가의 성취기준 비교 분석", 중등영어교육, 11(4), pp.127~146 (2018), 한국중등영어교육학회[DOI]
  23. 이동주, "영어 교과서와 전국 영어 듣기 평가에 나타난 고빈도 탈어휘 동사 연어에 대한 코퍼스 기반 연구", Brain, Digital, & Learning, 10(2), pp.177~191 (2020), 뇌·AI기반교육연구소[DOI]
  24. Lee, S. M., "A Practical Approach to Corpus-Based Analysis: Introducing Wordssmith Tools, Range, and Other Packages" (2018), Hankookmunhwasa
  25. 문진희, "고등영어 교과서의 듣기활동과 영어듣기평가 상관관계 연구", Foreign Languages Education, 14(2), pp.233~256 (2007), 한국외국어교육학회
  26. "Range: A program for the analysis of vocabulary in texts" (1994)[URL]
  27. 박명수, "Comparative Study of Delexical Verbsin an EFL Learner Corpus", 언어학 연구, (56), pp.195~216 (2020), 한국중원언어학회[DOI]
  28. 류주연, "영어 듣기 문항의 발화 속도와 언어적 요소 분석—1994-2018학년도 대학수학능력시험", 영어영문학21, 33(4), pp.105~127 (2020), 21세기영어영문학회[DOI]
  29. Scott, M, "WordSmith 8.0" (2020), Lexical Analysis software
  30. "2009 English curriculum basic vocabulary analysis program" (2014)[URL]
  31. "2015 English curriculum basic vocabulary analysis program" (2015)[URL]
  32. Shin, D. K., "Beyond single words: The most frequent collocations in spoken English", ELT Journal, 64, pp.339~348 (2007)
  33. Simpson-Vlach, R., "An academic formulas list : New methods in phraseology research", Applied Linguistics, 31, pp.487~512 (2010)
  34. Sinclair, J. M., "Collins COBUILD English Grammar" (1990), Harper Collins
  35. Siricharoen, R., "A corpus-based comparative study of lexical bundles in authentic and textbook English business emails", Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13, pp.41~63 (2020)
  36. 송선화, "대학수학능력시험 외국어영역에 나타난 Make, Get, Take의 코퍼스 기반 연어 분석", 인문학연구, 38(4), pp.223~251 (2011), 인문과학연구소
  37. 우수정, "Lexical Bundles in the Spoken Discourse of Native and Nonnative Speakers of English", 언어학연구, 24(3), pp.47~68 (2019), 한국언어연구학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

고등학교 영어 듣기 평가 영역에서의 코퍼스 기반 어휘다발 분석박소연, 이은주현대영어교육학회 · 현대영어교육2025 · 제26권 영어 교과서와 전국 영어 듣기 평가에 나타난 고빈도 탈어휘 동사 연어에 대한 코퍼스 기반 연구김나은, 이동주뇌·AI기반교육연구소 · Brain, Digital, & Learning2020 · 제10권 제2호최근 6년 간의 수능 영어 듣기평가 어휘 분석: 어휘 규모, 어휘 난이도, 고빈도 내용어 중심김가현, 차경환팬코리아영어교육학회 · 영어교육연구2021 · 제33권 제2호중학교 1, 2, 3학년 개정교과서와 2016-2020년 듣기 모의고사 코퍼스기반 어휘 분석: 어휘 수준, 다양성, 고빈도 내용어 중심차경환, 최은영팬코리아영어교육학회 · 영어교육연구2022 · 제34권 제1호An Analysis of Lexical Bundles in a High-stakes Test of L2 Reading: A Corpus Based StudyMURPHY ODO DENNIS과학교육연구소 · 교사교육연구2023 · 제62권 제1호영어과 교육과정, 대학수학능력시험, EBS 교재의 코퍼스 기반 어휘 분석이동주, 최민석뇌·AI기반교육연구소 · Brain, Digital, & Learning2020 · 제10권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

자기조절의 과정에서 나타나는 과학영재학생과 일반학생의 두뇌 활성과 사고 과정 비교 – fNIRS 연구권용주, 박진선pp. 405-416Addressing Challenges to a Systematic Thinking Pattern of Scientists: A Literature Review of Cognitive Bias in Scientific WorkRahmi Qurota Aini, 유스티카 샤반다리, 하민수, 아이 너래사리 루스마나pp. 417-430토픽 모델링 분석을 활용한 온라인 토론에 관한 연구 경향 분석김세화, 최숙기pp. 431-4452015 개정 교육과정의 중등 과학 교과서에 제시된 식물 관련 개념의 네트워크 분석임수민, 윤회정, 박신아, 김영신pp. 469-481자기주도적 탐구 활동에 대한 과학 교사의 인식과 교수 학습 전략하민수, 최윤희pp. 483-504
원문 보기