본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중학교 광합성 개념에 대한 교사의 지도 개념과학생의 획득 개념 사이의 개념 네트워크 분석

Analysis of Semantic Network between Teacher’s Teaching Concepts and Student’s Acquisition Concepts on Photosynthesis Domain in the Middle School

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

One of the key goals of science education is to enable students to acquire scientific concepts. Most science concepts are learned through teachers in class. Therefore, this study analyzesconceptual structure that teachers use to teach students and the conceptual structure thatstudents develop as they learn new concepts. Specifically, we examined the differencesbetween the conceptual frameworks used by teachers to teach students and the networksof concepts that students actually acquire, focusing on the topic of photosynthesis inmiddle school. Within the domain of photosynthesis, we categorized concepts into thephotosynthesis reactants, photosynthesis products, environmental factors. This studyrevealed that the types of concepts used by teachers in class and those acquired bystudents are similar, but the network structures differ. Teachers do not clearly distinguishand explain subtopics, and students also do not distinguish subtopics to acquired concepts. Teachers focus on explaining concepts, and students’ conceptual networks are influenced bysubsequent learning as well. Based on these findings, it is crucial for teachers to understandthe conceptual structures that students develop and to clearly articulate sub-concepts toguide their learning effectively. Furthermore, future research should explore whether thereare variations in acquired conceptual networks based on characteristics of the learners.

Abstract

One of the key goals of science education is to enable students to acquire scientific concepts. Most science concepts are learned through teachers in class. Therefore, this study analyzesconceptual structure that teachers use to teach students and the conceptual structure thatstudents develop as they learn new concepts. Specifically, we examined the differencesbetween the conceptual frameworks used by teachers to teach students and the networksof concepts that students actually acquire, focusing on the topic of photosynthesis inmiddle school. Within the domain of photosynthesis, we categorized concepts into thephotosynthesis reactants, photosynthesis products, environmental factors. This studyrevealed that the types of concepts used by teachers in class and those acquired bystudents are similar, but the network structures differ. Teachers do not clearly distinguishand explain subtopics, and students also do not distinguish subtopics to acquired concepts. Teachers focus on explaining concepts, and students’ conceptual networks are influenced bysubsequent learning as well. Based on these findings, it is crucial for teachers to understandthe conceptual structures that students develop and to clearly articulate sub-concepts toguide their learning effectively. Furthermore, future research should explore whether thereare variations in acquired conceptual networks based on characteristics of the learners.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Baldwin, T. T., "Transfer of training : A review and directions for future research", Personnel Psychology, 41(1), pp.63~105 (1988)[DOI]
  2. Kendall, (1993), Hunt Publishing Company
  3. Brophy, J., "Beyond behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm", pp.43~56 (1999)
  4. AllynBacon. Case, R., "The role of central conceptual structures in the development of children’s thought", Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 61(1, pp.2) (1996), 1~295
  5. Chance, P., "Learning and behavior" (2014), Wadsworth Cengage Learning
  6. Chi, M. T. H., "Memory development: Universal changes and individual differences", pp.169~194 (1988), Erlbaum
  7. Chung, D., "A case study on usage of semantic network analysis for concept analysis of textbooks: Focused on mantle concept of Earth ScienceⅡ textbooks", The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(12), pp.89~112 (2018)[DOI]
  8. Cochran-Smith, M., "Relationships of knowledge and practice : Teacher learning on communities", Review of Research on Education, 24(1), pp.249~305 (1999)[DOI]
  9. Doerfer, M. L., "A semantic network analysis of the international communication association", Human Communication Research, 25(4), pp.589~603 (1999)[DOI]
  10. Duit, R., "Conceptual change : A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning", International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), pp.671~688 (2003)[DOI]
  11. Duschl, R., "Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development" (1990), Teachers College Press
  12. Garrett, T., "Student-centered and teacher-centered classroom management : A case study of three elementary teachers", Journal of Classroom Interaction, 43(1), pp.34~47 (2008)
  13. "the Sixth Conference of the International History", 2001, ~, pp.Philosophy and Science Teaching Group. University of Colorado
  14. Kim H., "Niche overlap and proximity of photosynthesis concepts by middle school students’ cognitive level", Brain, Digital & learning, 13(3), pp.197~214 (2023)
  15. Kim, J., "Semantic network of the teacher’s teaching concept and the student’s acquisition concept in Mendelian inheritance by gender", Biology Education, 51(3), pp.311~321 (2023)
  16. Kim, P., "A study on the conceptions of photosynthesis in science textbooks of primary, middle and high school", Biology Education, 29(2), pp.106~112 (2001)
  17. Kim, Y., "An comparative study of articulation on science textbook concepts and extracted concepts in learning objectives using semantic network analysis –Focus on life science domain-", Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 35(3), pp.377~387 (2016)[DOI]
  18. Kim, Y., "The study on the recognition about evolution, biodiversity and ecology domain to be taught in elementary, secondary schools by secondary biology teacher", Secondary Education Research, 57(3), pp.29~52 (2009)
  19. Kim. Y., "A study on the horizontal and vertical articulations of photosynthesisrelated concepts according to the 7th, 2009 revised and 2015 revised curriculum", Biology Education, 49(3), pp.399~416 (2021)
  20. Kim, Y., "A concept networks analysis of the national curriculum, textbook, teacher’s instruction, and assessment on cell division unit of the high school life science I", Biology Education, 47(3), pp.393~402 (2019)
  21. Kwak, H., "School-level factors on the school academic achievement : Focusing on comparison of the factors on the ratio of high-achievement and under-achievement", The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 19(1), pp.333~358 (2016)[DOI]
  22. Kwon, H., "An analysis of semantic network in photosynthesis unit on middle school textbook based on the 2009 revised national science curriculum", Biology Education, 46(1), pp.63~70 (2018)
  23. Lee, D, "The Effects of Classroom Assessment on Students’ Academic Achievement – A Comparative Analysis Of Times 2015 Korea, Singapore and Japan Data", Master, pp.2015
  24. Lim, S., "Comparison of teaching and learning concepts network for Mendelian inheritance", International Journal of Science Education, pp.1~24 (2024)[DOI]
  25. Lim, S., "Semantic network analysis of memories of genetic domain concepts according to listening styles of 9th grade students", The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20, pp.127~144 (2020)
  26. Lim, S., "Analysis of level of understanding of 7th and 8th grade students on photosynthesis concepts by curriculum revision", Biology Education, 40(2), pp.179~194 (2012)
  27. Mallow, J. V., "Science Anxiety: Fear of science and how to overcome It" (1986), Thomond
  28. Marmaroti, P., "Pupils’ understanding of photosynthesis : A questionnaire for the simultaneous assessment of all aspects", International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), pp.383~403 (2006)[DOI]
  29. Martin, B. L., "Restructuring knowledge in biology : Cognitive processes and metacognitive reflections", International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), pp.303~323 (2000)[DOI]
  30. "2015 Revised Science Curriculum (2015-74, Separate books 9)", Ministry of Education, ~ (2015)
  31. Pianta, R. C., "Classroom processes and positive youth development : Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of interactions between teachers and students", New Directions for Youth Development, 2009(121), pp.33~46 (2009)[DOI]
  32. Schenke, K., "Differential effects of the classroom on African American and non-African American’s mathematics achievement", Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), pp.794~811 (2017)[DOI]
  33. Shim, J., "Analysis of conflict frames using semantic network analysis", The Korea Public Administration Journal, 20(2), pp.183~212 (2011)
  34. Siegler, R. S., "Memory performance and competencies: Issues in growth and development", pp.405~430 (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc
  35. Smith, M. U., "Knowing, believing, and understanding: What goals for science education?", Science & Education, 13(6), pp.553~582 (2004)[DOI]
  36. "the Third European Symposium on Conceptual Change", 2002, ~
  37. "the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching", 2002, ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)