본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

계약체결상 과실책임에 관한 법리의 재론

The Theories on the Liability of Culpa in Contrabendo

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The liability of Culpa in Contrabendo in Civil Act is one type of Article 535. In a case where a contract, whose objective is unattainable, is concluded, a party to the contract who was aware of, or should have been aware of such unattainability, shall be liable for damages suffered by the other party who relied upon the contract as valid: Provided, That the amount of damages to be recovered may not exceed the profit which would have occurred if the contract was valid. But a party shall not be liable for damages in a case where the other party was aware of, or should have been aware of such unattainability. I examined the consideration of the legal system on the liability of Culpa in Contrabendo, and demonstrated how Trust and Good Faith affects it; Trust and Good Faith shall apply to the primary impossibility of contract. And I focused that Trust and Good Faith shall not only apply to a basis of contract but also to before and after of contract. I propose to generalize Article 535; In a case where a contract, a party to the contract who was aware of, or should have been aware of nullity, shall be liable for damages suffered by the other party, who relied upon the contract as valid, should not have been aware of nullity.

Abstract

The liability of Culpa in Contrabendo in Civil Act is one type of Article 535. In a case where a contract, whose objective is unattainable, is concluded, a party to the contract who was aware of, or should have been aware of such unattainability, shall be liable for damages suffered by the other party who relied upon the contract as valid: Provided, That the amount of damages to be recovered may not exceed the profit which would have occurred if the contract was valid. But a party shall not be liable for damages in a case where the other party was aware of, or should have been aware of such unattainability. I examined the consideration of the legal system on the liability of Culpa in Contrabendo, and demonstrated how Trust and Good Faith affects it; Trust and Good Faith shall apply to the primary impossibility of contract. And I focused that Trust and Good Faith shall not only apply to a basis of contract but also to before and after of contract. I propose to generalize Article 535; In a case where a contract, a party to the contract who was aware of, or should have been aware of nullity, shall be liable for damages suffered by the other party, who relied upon the contract as valid, should not have been aware of nullity.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 곽윤직, "채권각론" (1997), 박영사
  2. 김대정, "계약체결상의 과실책임’", 성균관법학, 11(1) (1999), 성균관대학교 비교법연구소
  3. 김상용, "채권각론" (2003), 법문사
  4. 김준호, "민법판례" (2004), 광암출판사
  5. 김형배, "독일채권법의 현대화" (2003), 법문사
  6. 박희호, "계약체결상의 과실책임과 위법성", 외법논집, 18 (2005), 한국외대 외국학종합연구센터 법학연구소
  7. 양창수, "‘계약체결상의 과실’, 고시계, 1986.1", ~ (1986)
  8. 양창수, "‘원시적 불능론’in 민법연구 제3권" (1995), 박영사
  9. 이은영, "채권각론" (2000), 박영사
  10. 전하은, "주석채권각칙(Ⅰ)" (1985), 한국사법행정학회
  11. 지원림, "민법강의" (2002), 홍문사
  12. 최문기, "채권법강의Ⅱ(계약법)" (2004), 세종출판사
  13. 최흥섭, "‘계약이전단계에서의 책임(소위 계약체결상의 책임)과 민법 535조의 의미 - 특히 독일판례를 중심으로 한 비교법적 고찰 -’ , 한국민사법학의", ~
  14. 배경숙, "현대적 전개(배경숙교수화갑기념논문집)" (1991), 박영사
  15. 최흥섭, "원시적불능론과 민법 제535조", 재산법연구, 9(1) (1992), 한국재산법학회
  16. 민사법연구회, "민법안의견서" (1957), 일조각

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)