본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

온라인콘텐츠의 복제이용자책임

User's Liability on the Copy of Online-Contents

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The peculiarities of online-contents give rise to a serious trouble on copy of online-contents between the authors and the user. In spite of the possibility of a mass copy on internet, the copyright belongs to same family as the ownership. And Copyright Act enforce the regulations of user' liability on piracy. I examined two issues in detail. First, I asked the copyright belong to same family as the ownership. And I found that works is distinguishable from things in essence as well as in outward form. So the regulation of the duration and extinctive prescription apply to the copyright. Second, I asked that it is possible to get rid of the trouble on the copy of online-contents between the authors and the user. And I found that the authors putting the contents out to internet owe the duty of care and diligence to the unlawful copy of online-contents. So if the authors'sign is not on the online-contents, he can not lay claim to the copyright to the bona fide user of copy. By the time, the copyright is under discussion on the protection or the due to the public welfare. But it is necessary to be a lively discussion on works in essence and the bona fide user(customer). In adversary system, I hope to find the reasonable standpoint of the user' liability on piracy.

Abstract

The peculiarities of online-contents give rise to a serious trouble on copy of online-contents between the authors and the user. In spite of the possibility of a mass copy on internet, the copyright belongs to same family as the ownership. And Copyright Act enforce the regulations of user' liability on piracy. I examined two issues in detail. First, I asked the copyright belong to same family as the ownership. And I found that works is distinguishable from things in essence as well as in outward form. So the regulation of the duration and extinctive prescription apply to the copyright. Second, I asked that it is possible to get rid of the trouble on the copy of online-contents between the authors and the user. And I found that the authors putting the contents out to internet owe the duty of care and diligence to the unlawful copy of online-contents. So if the authors'sign is not on the online-contents, he can not lay claim to the copyright to the bona fide user of copy. By the time, the copyright is under discussion on the protection or the due to the public welfare. But it is necessary to be a lively discussion on works in essence and the bona fide user(customer). In adversary system, I hope to find the reasonable standpoint of the user' liability on piracy.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 곽윤직, "채권총론" (2006), 박영사
  2. 김대정, "채권총론" (2007), 피데스
  3. 김상용, "물권법" (2006), 법문사
  4. 김형배, "민법학강의" (2008), 신조사
  5. 오승종, "저작권법" (2009), 박영사
  6. 이대희, "인터넷과 지적재산권법" (2002), 박영사
  7. 이영준, "물권법" (2007), 박영사
  8. 조석홍, "정보통신과 지식재산권" (2003), 두남출판사
  9. 정해상, "민법학의 체계" (2008), 도서출판 아름다운생각
  10. 박준석, "이용자의 저작권침해에 따른 인터넷서비스제공자의 민사책임-P2P복제기술을 중심으로-", 박사, pp.2005
  11. 이상정, "디지털시대와 저작권제도의 갈등", 지적재산권법연구 (2000), 한국지적재산권학회
  12. 손용화, "온라인서비스提共者(OSP)의 著作權침해에 대한 責任", 상사법연구, 21(1), pp.23~732 (2002), 한국상사법학회
  13. 장재옥, "징벌적 손해배상과 법치국가의 원리", 법학논문집, 20 (1995), 중앙대학교 법학연구소
  14. 정해상, "損害賠償의 法理와 懲罰的 損害賠償의 관계", 중앙법학, 6(4), pp.241~253 (2004), 중앙법학회
  15. 정해상, "假想社會와 財産權- MMORPG를 中心으로 -", 중앙법학, 7(2), pp.171~188 (2005), 중앙법학회
  16. F. G. Lastowka, "The Laws of the Virtual Worlds", Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, (26) (2003), Univ. of Penn. Law School
  17. 早川吉尙, "懲罰的損害賠償の本質", 民商法雜誌, 110(6) (1995)
  18. 後藤孝典, "制裁的慰藉料論", 法律時報, 52(9) (1980)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)