기업의 비자금 조성 및 사용에 대한 형사책임
Criminal liability on Rasing Slush Fund and Use it
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
When the accuseds raise slush fund by using a borrowed-name bank account, illegal acquire intent was realized objectively, therefore embezzement come into extence. If company did agree on their rasing slush fund by using a borrowed-name bank account, the slush fund can be estimated as illegal cause trust property. Especially punishment and administration are levied on using a borrowed-name bank account by finance banking one's real name law section 1 of article 6, section 2 of article 7, therefore the slush fund of object ruling is against good custom and public order, so the slush fund becomes illegal cause trust property. Because object ruling premise trust intent of campany, he had to judge true or not, the slush fund is illegal cause trust property. Even though, object ruling made a mlstake to ignore it and to give the guilty verdict.
Abstract
When the accuseds raise slush fund by using a borrowed-name bank account, illegal acquire intent was realized objectively, therefore embezzement come into extence. If company did agree on their rasing slush fund by using a borrowed-name bank account, the slush fund can be estimated as illegal cause trust property. Especially punishment and administration are levied on using a borrowed-name bank account by finance banking one's real name law section 1 of article 6, section 2 of article 7, therefore the slush fund of object ruling is against good custom and public order, so the slush fund becomes illegal cause trust property. Because object ruling premise trust intent of campany, he had to judge true or not, the slush fund is illegal cause trust property. Even though, object ruling made a mlstake to ignore it and to give the guilty verdict.
참고문헌 (17)
- 이재상, "형법각론" (2010), 박영사
- 성주목, "기업범죄의 이론과 실제" (2010), 세팡출판사
- 이형국, "형법각론" (2007), 법문사
- 정웅석, "형법강의", pp.1211~ (2006), 대명출판사
- 정영일, "형법개론" (2005), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "민법주해 채권(10)" (2005), 박영사
- 서정욱, "형법강의" (2004), 유스티니아누스
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2003), 박영사
- 김주수, "채권각론" (1997), 삼영사
- 이은영, "채권각론" (1992), 박영사
- 김증한, "채권각론", pp.432~433 (1988), 박영사
- 김성욱, "불법원인급여와 관련한 법적 쟁점", 동아법학, (51), pp.273~295 (2011), 법학연구소
- 남상근, "불법원인 급여물의 횡령죄 성부", 형사정책, 21(1), pp.69~102 (2009), 한국형사정책학회
- 류석준, "기업의 비자금조성행위에 대한 형사처벌 가능성 검토", 형사법연구, 19(3-하), pp.663~678 (2007), 한국형사법학회
- 최상욱, "불법원인급여물과 형사책임", 법학연구, 16(1), pp.19~39 (2006), 법학연구원
- 문형섭, "불법원인위탁과 횡령죄", 비교형사법연구, 13(2), pp.113~135 (2011), 한국비교형사법학회
- 김선복, "사회보호법상 보호감호의 문제점", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.30~810 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
