표준특허권 침해에 대한 잠재적 실시권자의 보호방안에 관한 연구
A Study on the Way to protect the Potential Licensee who infringes SEP
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The world's major enterprises are focusing on securing SEP(Standard Essential Patent). The reason is that enterprises which secured SEP can have their dominant market share in the related field and can receive lots of royalty from enterprises which want to use that SEP(potential licensee). On the other hand, the potential licensee faces with the problem that the license negotiation for using SEP breaks down. When the potential licensee uses it without the license for using the SEP, the owner of the SEP takes action of injunction against the potential licensee. For this reason, the potential licensee is having difficulty in entering into the market of the related field and finally surrendering initiatives of the related field. The main reason for making this situation is that whether or not the owner of the SEP can take action of injunction against the potential licensee is uncertain. Naturally, it is necessary that the patentee can take action of injunction against a person who infringes the patent. However, when the potential licensee negotiated for the license with the owner of the SEP that declared FRAND terms but the negotiation broke down, and after that, the potential licensee used the SEP without the patentee's permission, there is the problem on whether the owner of the SEP can take action of injunction against the potential licensee or not. This paper would like to inspect each nation court' tendency whether taking action of injunction abuses SEP or not, when the owner of the SEP that declared FRAND terms takes action of injunction. In addition, this paper would like to coincide with the purpose of the Patent Act(to accelerate the development of technology through the protection, encouragement, promotion, and utilization of inventions, and thereby contribute to the development of industry) by protecting the potential licensee through the Patent Act' revised version allowing a compulsory license.
Abstract
The world's major enterprises are focusing on securing SEP(Standard Essential Patent). The reason is that enterprises which secured SEP can have their dominant market share in the related field and can receive lots of royalty from enterprises which want to use that SEP(potential licensee). On the other hand, the potential licensee faces with the problem that the license negotiation for using SEP breaks down. When the potential licensee uses it without the license for using the SEP, the owner of the SEP takes action of injunction against the potential licensee. For this reason, the potential licensee is having difficulty in entering into the market of the related field and finally surrendering initiatives of the related field. The main reason for making this situation is that whether or not the owner of the SEP can take action of injunction against the potential licensee is uncertain. Naturally, it is necessary that the patentee can take action of injunction against a person who infringes the patent. However, when the potential licensee negotiated for the license with the owner of the SEP that declared FRAND terms but the negotiation broke down, and after that, the potential licensee used the SEP without the patentee's permission, there is the problem on whether the owner of the SEP can take action of injunction against the potential licensee or not. This paper would like to inspect each nation court' tendency whether taking action of injunction abuses SEP or not, when the owner of the SEP that declared FRAND terms takes action of injunction. In addition, this paper would like to coincide with the purpose of the Patent Act(to accelerate the development of technology through the protection, encouragement, promotion, and utilization of inventions, and thereby contribute to the development of industry) by protecting the potential licensee through the Patent Act' revised version allowing a compulsory license.
참고문헌 (30)
- 윤선희, "특허법" (2013), 법문사
- 이해영, "미국특허법" (2010), 한빛지적소유권센터
- 임병웅, "이지특허법" (2009), 한빛지적소유권센터
- 특허청 표준특허연구회, "손안의 표준특허 매뉴얼", 특허청 표준특허연구회⋅한국특허정보원 표준특허센터, ~ (2012)
- Availability of Injunctive Relief for Standard-Essential Patent Holders, "Brian T. Yeh", Congressional Research Service, ~ (2013)
- J. Gregory Sidak, "The Meaning of FRAND, Part I: Royalties", J. COMPETITION L. & ECON, 9 (2013)
- Larry A. Goldstein, "Technology Patent Licensing" (2004), Aspatore
- 김주형, "특허권 등 침해에 대한 금지청구권" (1992), 법원도서관
- 문선영, "특허권 간접침해 규정의 문제점과 개선방안", 법학논고, (45), pp.561~584 (2014), 법학연구원
- 박영수, "기존 FRAND의 문제점과 새로운 대안제시-표준특허권자의 권리보호와 실시권자의 이용 도모의 조화로운 균형의 측면에서-", 인하법률, (3) (2013)
- 송재섭, "표준특허에 근거한 권리행사의 한계 - 침해금지청구권과 손해배상청구권을 중심으로 -", 저스티스, 140, pp.210~249 (2014), 한국법학원
- 원정욱, "표준특허 라이센싱의 문제점 대응방안, 제2회 정보통신표준화 우수논문집", 한국정보통신기술협회, ~ (2006)
- 이만섭, "표준특허 확보해야 세계시장 지배", 기계저널, 49(3) (2009), 대한기계학회
- 이황, "FRAND 확약 위반과 특허위협(Hold-up)에대한 공정거래법상 규제의 기준", 저스티스, (129), pp.193~248 (2012), 한국법학원
- 장지훈, "통신표준필수 특허 창출 및 활용에 대한 법률상 문제와 이에 대한 대응 전략", 정보와 통신, 29(2) (2012), 한국통신학회
- 최승재, "부당한 지적재산권 행사에 대한 심사기준의 개정에 대하여 -지적재산권 신탁에 대한 논의를 중심으로-", IT와 법연구, (4), pp.63~88 (2010), IT와 법연구소
- 홍대식, "기술표준 관련 특허권의 행사와 한국 공정거래법의 적용 - 지식재산권 심사지침에 대한 비판적 검토를 중심으로 -", 고려법학, (63), pp.185~242 (2011), 법학연구원
- Brenda P Fuller, "Local judgement with an international economic approach-new German case law on the FRAND defence in patent litigation", ACC(Association of Corporate Counsel), April 2, 2009, ~ (2009)
- Florian Mueller, "French Court Denies Samsung Request for iPhone 4S ban", Foss Patents, Dec. 8, 2011, ~ (2011)
- Florian Mueller, "Italian Court Denies Samsung Motion for Preliminary Injunction Against iPhone 4S", Foss Patents, Jan. 5, 2012, ~ (2012)
- Gertjan Kuipers, "A further perspective on Apple v Samsung:How to successfully enforce Standard Essential Patents(SEPs) in the Netherlands", Mondaq, Sept. 11, 2012, ~ (2012)
- Leon B. Greenfield, "SEP Enforcement Disputes Beyond the Water's Edge: A Survey of Recent Non-U.S. Decisions", ANTITRUST, 27(3) (2013)
- Paul A. David, "The Economics of Compatibility Standards: An Introduction to Recent Research", Econ. Innov. New Tech, 1 (1990)
- "국가기술표준원 홈페이지 참조", 국가기술표준원[URL]
- "국가표준인증종합정보센터 “표준의 이해” 참조", 국가표준인증종합정보센터[URL]
- "정보통신표준화위원회(ICT Standardization Committee)의 표준화 관련 규정 참조", 정보통신표준화위원회[URL]
- "Samsung handed another setback in German SEP patent case, Electronista, Nov. 23, 2013" (2013)[URL]
- "Form 10-K(Annual Report), InterDigital, Inc. at 22-23 (Feb. 26, 2013)" (2013)[URL]
- "Apple vs. Samsung: Another Loss For Samsung In German Court, IBTIMES, Nov. 25, 2013" (2013)[URL]
- "IP High Court rules in Apple v Samsung FRAND case, International Briefings, Sept. 1, 2014" (2014)[URL]