사내하도급근로자의 안전에 대한 도급인의 책임에 관한 고찰
The Study on the Responsibilities of the Prime - contractor for the Safety of the In - house Subcontract Worker
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The in-house subcontractor is performing the business by providing only labor force of his employees without his own production facilities or production equipment. The in-house subcontractor is poor fiscal and management skills to prevent his employees from safety accidents. Therefore, the in-house subcontract worker is exposed to the safety accidents and they are less protected than ordinary worker. The prime-contractor provides his working places, facilities, equipment, etc to the in-house subcontract worker and gets the benefit through in-house subcontract. However, the prime-contractor is not responsible for the in-house subcontract worker’s safety accidents. The obligation of prime-contractor on health and safety for workers under in-house subcontract is limited at present. Labor law and Occupational Safety and Health Act(OSHA) exception for some articles is not applied to the prime-contractor because the prime-contractor doesn't directly employ the employees. Then, some have criticized that the prime-contractor has transfer the danger of the work related injuries to the in-house subcontract worker. It requires the prime-contractor using the service of the in-house subcontract worker in their establishments to undertake the responsibility for providing a safe and healthful workplace. This explores the prime-contractor's legal responsibility for the in-house subcontract worker’s safety accidents, that is, the safe care obligations in the contract, the safety and health measures obligations for contracted projects in the OSHA, the liability of torts(article 750), the employer's liability(article 756), the liability of person who ordered work to be done(article 757), the liability of possessor(article 758) in the Civil Law.
Abstract
The in-house subcontractor is performing the business by providing only labor force of his employees without his own production facilities or production equipment. The in-house subcontractor is poor fiscal and management skills to prevent his employees from safety accidents. Therefore, the in-house subcontract worker is exposed to the safety accidents and they are less protected than ordinary worker. The prime-contractor provides his working places, facilities, equipment, etc to the in-house subcontract worker and gets the benefit through in-house subcontract. However, the prime-contractor is not responsible for the in-house subcontract worker’s safety accidents. The obligation of prime-contractor on health and safety for workers under in-house subcontract is limited at present. Labor law and Occupational Safety and Health Act(OSHA) exception for some articles is not applied to the prime-contractor because the prime-contractor doesn't directly employ the employees. Then, some have criticized that the prime-contractor has transfer the danger of the work related injuries to the in-house subcontract worker. It requires the prime-contractor using the service of the in-house subcontract worker in their establishments to undertake the responsibility for providing a safe and healthful workplace. This explores the prime-contractor's legal responsibility for the in-house subcontract worker’s safety accidents, that is, the safe care obligations in the contract, the safety and health measures obligations for contracted projects in the OSHA, the liability of torts(article 750), the employer's liability(article 756), the liability of person who ordered work to be done(article 757), the liability of possessor(article 758) in the Civil Law.
참고문헌 (47)
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (1995), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2003), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "채권총론" (1995), 박영사
- 김현태, "채권법각론" (1969), 일조각
- 김형배, "노동법" (2011), 박영사
- 김형배, "채권각론(계약법)" (2001), 박영사
- 노동부, "파견·도급 구별 참고자료", ~ (2009)
- 불법파견 형태의 사내하도급 문제 해결을 위한 참여정부의 노력과 과제, "노동부", ~ (2007)
- 산업안전보건법집행의 효율성 강화를 위한 개선방안에 관한 연구, "산업안전보건연구원", ~ (2006)
- 임종률, "노동법" (2011), 박영사
- 임종률, "노동법" (2012), 박영사
- 이은영, "채권각론" (2005), 박영사
- 이은영, "채권각론" (1999), 박영사
- 하갑래, "근로기준법" (2003), 중앙경제사
- 사내하도급과 산업안전, "한국노동연구원", ~ (2015)
- 강선희, "사내하도급근로자에 대한 도급사업주의 안전배려의무와 산안법상 안전보호조치의무", 고려법학, (64), pp.319~365 (2012), 법학연구원
- 권두섭, "현대자동차 불법파견 판결의 내용과 의미", 현대차 불법파견 판결 그 후, 정규직 전환 방안 토론회 (2010)
- 권영문, "민법상 사용자의 안전배려의무- 연구대상 판결 : 대법원 2006. 9. 28. 선고 2004다44506 판결", 판례연구, 19 (2008), 부산판례연구회
- 김봉수, "노무도급과 위장도급", 안암법학, (39), pp.353~400 (2012), 안암법학회
- 김형석, "사용자책임의 요건으로서 사용관계", 민사법학, 62, pp.229~272 (2013), 한국민사법학회
- 나민오, "산업안전보건법의 체계와 입법방향에 관한 연구", 고려대학교노동문제연구, 19 (2010), 고려대학교 노동문제연구소
- 노상헌, "산업안전보건법상 사내하도급에 관한 사업주 책임", 노동법논총, 25, pp.177~207 (2012), 한국비교노동법학회[DOI]
- 방준식, "사내하도급관계에 있어서 사용자의 안전배려의무", 안암법학, 통(25), pp.795~816 (2007), 안암법학회
- 손정순, "민간 고용서비스업 및 파견노동자 실태와 정책적 개선 방향", 민간고용서비스업 및 파견노동자 실태와 개선과제 마련을 위한 토론회 (2010)
- 송덕수, "공작물책임과 실화의 경우의 배상액 경감청구", 고시계, 59(1) (2013), 고시계사
- 신국미, "도급인의 불법행위책임 구조", 고려법학, (45) (2005), 고려대학교 법학연구원
- 신은종, "미국 공동사용자 원리의 변화와 간접고용관계에 대한 함의:‘브라우닝-페리스 사건’ 결정(2015)을 중심으로", 노동정책연구, 16(1), pp.87~131 (2016), 한국노동연구원
- 이상원, "수급인(하도급인) 또는 그 피용자의 불법행위에 대하여 도급인이 책임을 지는 경우", 사법행정, 348 (1989), 한국사법행정학회
- 이상태, "도급계약에 관한 판례의 동향", 민사법학, 15, pp.351~ (1997), 한국민사법학회
- 이인재, "공작물책임에 있어서의 하자", 사법행정, 34(3) (1993), 한국사법행정학회
- 임성권, "공작물 책임", 사회과학연구, 6 (1993), 서원대학교미래창조연구원
- 전형배, "도급과 근로자의 안전", 노동법논총, 31, pp.377~406 (2014), 한국비교노동법학회
- 정명현, "사내하도급근로자의 임금차별에 대한 법적 규제 가능성 연구", 노동법논총, 22, pp.199~253 (2011), 한국비교노동법학회
- 하경효, "사용자책임과 관련된 몇 가지 문제", 고시연구, 292 (1998), 고시연구사
- 홍천용, "건설공사에 있어서 제3자의 손해에 대한 사법적 구제", 민사법학, (4·5) (1985), 한국민사법학회
- 岡村親宜, "勞災裁判の展開と法理" (1992), 總合勞働硏究所
- 林 豊, "新·裁判實務大系 17" (2001), 靑林書院
- 五十嵐, "註釋民法(19)" (1965), 有斐閣
- 我妻榮, "事務管理·不當利得·不法行爲" (1938), 評論社
- 前田達明, "判例不法行爲法" (1978), 靑林書院新社
- 岡松參 太郞, "無過失損害賠償責任論" (1953), 有斐閣
- 前上富信, "民法學(6)" (1975), 有斐閣
- 和田 肇, "雇用と安全配慮義務", ジュリスト, (828) (1985), 有斐閣
- Atiyah, "Vicarious Liability in the Law of Torts", pp.35~36 (1967)
- Flour, "Les obligations", pp.201~211 (2003), Le fait juridique
- H. Koziol,
- "Markesinis and Deakin, Tort Law", pp.666~ (2008)