본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

보조생식술에 있어 Informed Consent에 관한 연구 우리나라와 영국의 동의 체계 및 동의 서식에 대한 비교를 중심으로

A Study on Informed Consent for using the Assisted Reproductive Technology: Focusing on the comparison of the UK & KOREA Informed Consent Form and System

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In receiving the medical treatment service like as the assisted reproductive technology for the pregnancy and the gamete donation,Informed Consent is the most important thing to protect the right to self determination as well as to manage the human gamete and embryo. To the appropriate informed consent, the Informed Consent Form and System should be prepared appropriately. In UK, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has offered all Informed Consent Form related to using the assisted reproductive technology officially. The UK HFEA forms are classified so much according to the right holder of the consent. And the contents of these forms are concreted so much according to the details to be obtained the consent as well as offered with the explanation of the details to be obtained. In Korea, some Informed Consent Forms related to using the assisted reproductive technology has offered by the law and some Informed Consent Forms has offered by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. But some necessary Informed Consent Forms has not offered by both of them. Also,these offered Informed Consent Forms is not appropriate to protect the right to self determination as well as to manage the human gamete and embryo because they are not enough to confirm so many details to be determined by the right holder of the consent. This article analyzes the UK HFEA Informed Consent Forms and System related to the assisted reproductive technology and compares them and KOREA Informed Consent Forms and System to seek the way to improve them.

Abstract

In receiving the medical treatment service like as the assisted reproductive technology for the pregnancy and the gamete donation,Informed Consent is the most important thing to protect the right to self determination as well as to manage the human gamete and embryo. To the appropriate informed consent, the Informed Consent Form and System should be prepared appropriately. In UK, Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has offered all Informed Consent Form related to using the assisted reproductive technology officially. The UK HFEA forms are classified so much according to the right holder of the consent. And the contents of these forms are concreted so much according to the details to be obtained the consent as well as offered with the explanation of the details to be obtained. In Korea, some Informed Consent Forms related to using the assisted reproductive technology has offered by the law and some Informed Consent Forms has offered by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. But some necessary Informed Consent Forms has not offered by both of them. Also,these offered Informed Consent Forms is not appropriate to protect the right to self determination as well as to manage the human gamete and embryo because they are not enough to confirm so many details to be determined by the right holder of the consent. This article analyzes the UK HFEA Informed Consent Forms and System related to the assisted reproductive technology and compares them and KOREA Informed Consent Forms and System to seek the way to improve them.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김강운, "헌법상 자기결정권의 의의", 법학연구, (20), pp.161~179 (2005), 한국법학회
  2. 최경석, "생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률의 쟁점과 이해", 이화여대 생명의료법연구소 보건복지부 지정 생명윤리정책연구센터, 30~ (2010)
  3. 최행식, "醫師의 說明義務와 患者의 自己決定權", 법학연구, (17), pp.341~363 (2004), 한국법학회
  4. 구인회, "배아보호에 관한 윤리적 검토", 한국의료윤리학회지, 12(3), pp.287~302 (2009), 한국의료윤리학회
  5. 구인회, "배아연구와 관련된 윤리적 문제점들", 한국의료윤리학회지, 9(1), pp.16~27 (2006), 한국의료윤리학회
  6. 강신익, "생명공학과 줄기세포 연구의 담론구조", 진보평론, (25), pp.84~99 (2005), 진보평론
  7. 김경례, "줄기세포연구에 대한 대항담론의 구조와 몸들의 정치 - 페미니즘 과학정치의 구성을 위하여 -", 아시아여성연구, 48(1), pp.159~190 (2009), 아시아여성연구소
  8. 김혁돈, "줄기세포연구와 배아보호", 법학논고, (32), pp.329~353 (2010), 법학연구원
  9. 엄영란, "난자를 생명공학연구에 사용함에 대한 윤리적 고찰", 한국여성철학, 4, pp.95~142 (2004), 한국여성철학회
  10. 정연보, "배아줄기세포연구와 젠더-난자제공과 여성의 노동 및 참여를 중심으로-", 페미니즘연구, 7(1), pp.177~209 (2007), 한국여성연구소
  11. 김은애, "생식세포 기증, 수증의 공적 관리 및 지원:영국의 인간수정및배아발생관할관청(HFEA)을 중심으로", 생명윤리정책연구, 3(1), pp.69~89 (2009), 생명의료법연구소
  12. 김은애, "영국 인간 수정 및 배아발생에 관한 법률(HFEA) 개정의 내용 및 시사점:보조생식에 따른 부모의 법적 확정에 관한 'part2'를 중심으로", 생명윤리정책연구, 3(2), pp.199~232 (2009), 생명의료법연구소
  13. 김은애, "법적 부모 규정방식 변화의 필요성 : 보조생식술에 따른 모성ㆍ부성 개념 변화와 관련하여", 한국여성철학, 12, pp.117~143 (2009), 한국여성철학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)