본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Hey Watson – Can I Sue You for Malpractice? Examining the Liability of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

IBM’s Watson achieved celebrity on the quiz show Jeopardy! but it is now weighing in on matters of life and death as an expert system in the healthcare setting. Increasing automation in areas such as oncological research and diagnostics promises significant reductions in morbidity and mortality, but several barriers stand in the way of such technology’s widespread implementation and acceptance. As Watson achieves greater accuracy and is increasingly relied upon by doctors, one key question will become: how should liability be assigned where medical errors can be traced to an “artificial” intelligence (AI)? Using philosophical and legal concepts, this article classifies Watson’s current capabilities and examines how humans make “good” decisions in order to better characterize Watson’s role and potential faults. The authors conclude that Watson warrants a unique legal status akin to personhood and is analogous to a medical resident, in that both require “oversight” by an attending physician. We therefore argue that liability for wrongful diagnoses by medical AI should attach on a medical malpractice basis rather than through a products liability or vicarious liability scheme, and can thus be addressed contractually between the AI provider and medical institutions rather than constituting an open question for legislatures.

Abstract

IBM’s Watson achieved celebrity on the quiz show Jeopardy! but it is now weighing in on matters of life and death as an expert system in the healthcare setting. Increasing automation in areas such as oncological research and diagnostics promises significant reductions in morbidity and mortality, but several barriers stand in the way of such technology’s widespread implementation and acceptance. As Watson achieves greater accuracy and is increasingly relied upon by doctors, one key question will become: how should liability be assigned where medical errors can be traced to an “artificial” intelligence (AI)? Using philosophical and legal concepts, this article classifies Watson’s current capabilities and examines how humans make “good” decisions in order to better characterize Watson’s role and potential faults. The authors conclude that Watson warrants a unique legal status akin to personhood and is analogous to a medical resident, in that both require “oversight” by an attending physician. We therefore argue that liability for wrongful diagnoses by medical AI should attach on a medical malpractice basis rather than through a products liability or vicarious liability scheme, and can thus be addressed contractually between the AI provider and medical institutions rather than constituting an open question for legislatures.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. "Article: Artificial Intelligence Litigation: Can the Law Keep Pace with The Rise of the Machines?" (2016)[URL]
  2. "Watson Oncology"[URL]
  3. "Kurzweil Claims that the Singularity Will Happen by 2045, Futurism, March 15, 2017" (2017)[URL]
  4. M Furmankiewicz, "Artificial Intelligence Systems for Knowledge Management in E-Health: The Study of Intelligent Software Agents", Latest Trends on Systems, 2 (2014)
  5. "A Look at IBM’s Watson 5 Years after Its Breathtaking Jeopardy Debut, Singularity Hub, August 10, 2016" (2016)[URL]
  6. "IBM’s Watson Computer Can Now Do in a Matter of Minutes What it Takes Cancer Doctors Weeks to Perform, Business Insider, May 5, 2015" (2015)[URL]
  7. "Florida’s Jupiter Center Becomes First US hospital to Use IBM’s Watson for Oncology, MobiHealth News, February 1, 2017" (2017)[URL]
  8. "Here’s How Often IBM’s Watson Agrees with Doctors on the Best Way to Treat Cancer, Business Insider, June 2, 2017" (2017)[URL]
  9. "IBM’s Watson AI Saved a Woman from Leukemia, Engadget, August 7, 2016" (2016)[URL]
  10. "What is Using IBM Watson in Everyday Medicine Like?"[URL]
  11. "What Americans Are Most Worried about When It Comes to Robots, Morning Consult, April 10, 2017" (2017)[URL]
  12. René Descartes, "Discourse On Method and Meditations on First Philosophy" (1993), Hackett Publishing Company
  13. John Cottingham, "‘A Brute to the Brutes?’ Descartes’ Treatment of Animals", Philosophy, 53, pp.551~ (1978)
  14. Terry Winograd, "The Boundaries of Humanity", pp.199~200 (1991), University of California Press
  15. Immanuel Kant, "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  16. John Rawls, "A Theory of Justice" (1971), The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
  17. "Learning in Artificial Intelligence: Does Bloom’s Taxonomy Apply?" (2016)[URL]
  18. "Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives" (2017)[URL]
  19. "IBM Watson: How it Works" (2014)[URL]
  20. "A Survey on Question Answering System"[URL]
  21. "Elon Musk Issues a Stark Warning about A.I., Calls It a Bigger Threat than North Korea, CNBC, August 11, 2017" (2017)[URL]
  22. "Elon Musk’s Billion-Dollar Crusade to Stop the A.I. Apocalypse" (2017)[URL]
  23. Jia Liu, "Syringe-Injectable Electronics", Nature Nanotechnology, 10, pp.629~636 (2015)
  24. "A Flexible Circuit Has Been Injected Into Living Brains" (2015)[URL]
  25. "In India, IBM’s Watson Will Aid Cancer Care Where Doctors are Scarce, Forbes, December 2, 2015" (2015)[URL]
  26. Jessica S. Allain, "From Jeopardy! to Jaundice: The Medical Liability Implications of Dr. Watson and Other Artificial Intelligence Systems", Louisiana Law Review, 73 (2013)
  27. Patricia Danzon, "Medical Malpractice: Theory, Evidence, and Public Policy", pp.1~ (1985), Harvard University Press
  28. Marshall B. Kapp, "Legal Implications of Clinical Supervision of Medical Students and Residents", Journal of Medical Education, 58 (1983)
  29. David C. Vladeck, "Machines without Principals: Liability Rules and Artificial Intelligence", Wash. L. Rev, 89, pp.117~ (2014)
  30. Michael A. Pittenger, "Reformulating The Strict Liability Failure to Warn", Wash. & Lee L. Rev, 49, pp.1509~ (1992)
  31. "Medical Student Responsibilities" (2016)[URL]
  32. "Responsibility of Students" (2017)[URL]
  33. "IBM Watson for Genomics Helps Doctors Give Patients New Hope"[URL]
  34. Hardeep Singh, "Medical Errors Involving Trainees: A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims from 5 Insurers", Archives of Internal Medicine, 167(19), pp.2030~ (2007)
  35. "The Alarming Rate of Errors in the ICU" (2012)[URL]
  36. "Should Residents and Students Be Sued in Medical Malpractice Cases?" (2011)[URL]
  37. "It’s Legal Malpractice Not to Sue Hospital Residents for Medical Malpractice" (2017)[URL]
  38. "Law and Regulation of Artificial Intelligence and Robots: Conceptual Framework and Normative Implications" (2017)[URL]
  39. "IBM to Congress: Watson will Transform Health Care, So Keep Your Hands off our Supercomputer" (2017)[URL]
  40. "The Reasonable Computer: Disrupting the Paradigm of Tort Liability, George Washington Law Review"[URL]
  41. "When Does an Artificial Intelligence Become a Person?" (2016)[URL]
  42. "Why Self-Driving Cars Must be Programmed to Kill, MIT Technology Review, October 22, 2015" (2015)[URL]
  43. "S. Korea to Face Shortage of Medical Workers, Yonhap News, May 3, 2017" (2017)[URL]
  44. "Hospital Stumbles in Bid to Teach a Computer to Treat Cancer, The Wall Street Journal, March 8, 2017" (2017)[URL]
  45. "4 Reasons MD Anderson Put IBM Watson on Hold, Becker’s Health IT and CIO Review" (2017)[URL]
  46. "MD Anderson Benches IBM Watson in Setback for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Forbes, February 19, 2017" (2017)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)