단체교섭의 대상 사항에 관한 노사협의회 의결의 효력
The Effect of Labor-Management Council Resolution on the Subject Matters of Collective Bargaining
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the case of that a labor-management council decides the matters concerning working conditions, the effect of the decision be questioned. When we accept the effect of collective agreement for decision of labor-management council about the matters concerning working conditions, there is possibility that the right to bargain collectively for trade union representatives may weaken, and that the decision of labor-management council can be abused for the purpose of avoidance from the rules of the industrial action or unfair labor practice on the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act, from authentication voting of union members on the constitution of a labor union. Thus, it is necessary to clarify about the requirement for recognition of efficacy and judgment standard as a collective agreement for the resolution of labor-management council. Considering that the matters concerning working conditions is the subject matters of the collective bargaining, and that the purpose of the labor-management council system and the collective bargaining system are different from each other, and that the matters concerning working conditions is not called out on the Act on the Promotion of Worker Participation and Cooperation(APWPC) as the matter of the labor-management council resolution, it is judged that the matters concerning working conditions cannot be decided at the labor-management council. Therefore, the resolution of the labor-management council about the matters concerning working conditions has no effect to determine the working condition of an employees. Because the labor-management council is only a conference system, not taking a legal position as the contracting parties. But the resolution of the labor-management council about the matters concerning working conditions can be recognized as a collective agreement in case of that the resolution is satisfied with the formal-practical requirements as a collective agreement or is based on the delegation article of a collective agreement. Unless the resolution is not satisfied with the formal-practical requirements as a collective agreement or without the delegation article of a collective agreement, the resolution cannot be recognized as a collective agreement. And also, the resolution of the labor-management council about the matters concerning working conditions cannot be recognized as a work rules, because the resolution procedure does not follow the provisions concerning the work rules on the Labor Standard Act. But although the resolution of the labor-management council about the matters concerning working conditions cannot be recognized as a work rules, both parties may request a sincere commitment to the promise.
Abstract
In the case of that a labor-management council decides the matters concerning working conditions, the effect of the decision be questioned. When we accept the effect of collective agreement for decision of labor-management council about the matters concerning working conditions, there is possibility that the right to bargain collectively for trade union representatives may weaken, and that the decision of labor-management council can be abused for the purpose of avoidance from the rules of the industrial action or unfair labor practice on the Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act, from authentication voting of union members on the constitution of a labor union. Thus, it is necessary to clarify about the requirement for recognition of efficacy and judgment standard as a collective agreement for the resolution of labor-management council. Considering that the matters concerning working conditions is the subject matters of the collective bargaining, and that the purpose of the labor-management council system and the collective bargaining system are different from each other, and that the matters concerning working conditions is not called out on the Act on the Promotion of Worker Participation and Cooperation(APWPC) as the matter of the labor-management council resolution, it is judged that the matters concerning working conditions cannot be decided at the labor-management council. Therefore, the resolution of the labor-management council about the matters concerning working conditions has no effect to determine the working condition of an employees. Because the labor-management council is only a conference system, not taking a legal position as the contracting parties. But the resolution of the labor-management council about the matters concerning working conditions can be recognized as a collective agreement in case of that the resolution is satisfied with the formal-practical requirements as a collective agreement or is based on the delegation article of a collective agreement. Unless the resolution is not satisfied with the formal-practical requirements as a collective agreement or without the delegation article of a collective agreement, the resolution cannot be recognized as a collective agreement. And also, the resolution of the labor-management council about the matters concerning working conditions cannot be recognized as a work rules, because the resolution procedure does not follow the provisions concerning the work rules on the Labor Standard Act. But although the resolution of the labor-management council about the matters concerning working conditions cannot be recognized as a work rules, both parties may request a sincere commitment to the promise.
참고문헌 (23)
- 고용노동부, "노사협의회 운영 매뉴얼", ~ (2011)
- 국회법제실, "법제실무" (2011), 세븐스가든
- 김형배, "노동법" (2009), 박영사
- 노사정위원회, "노사협의회 활성화 관련 논의자료", ~ (2003)
- 문원주, "실무근로기준법" (1991), 법원사
- 근로자대표제도의 재구성을 위한 법이론적 검토, "박제성", 한국노동연구원, ~ (2013)
- 이병태, "노동법" (2008), 중앙경제사
- 이상윤, "노동법" (2002), 법문사
- 이상윤, "노동조합법" (1996), 박영사
- 임종률, "노동법" (2015), 박영사
- 하갑래, "집단적노동관계법" (2010), (주)중앙경제
- 菅野和夫, "日本勞動法" (2007), 법문사
- 김기섭, "노·사 합의된 단체협약체결권 사항 조합원 총회 추인에 따른 효력", 노동법률, (32) (1993), 중앙경제사
- 김유성, "조합대표자의 단체교섭권한과 협약체결권한", 사법행정, 34(8) (1993)
- 윤정환, "단체교섭대표자의 협약체결권한의 제한", 노사문제연구, 3 (1993)
- 이승욱, "한국 노사협의회의 운영과 관련한 법적 문제점과 입법정책상의 과제", 추계학술대회발표자료 (2000), 한국노사관계학회
- 이승욱, "노사협의회 의결사항의 효력", 노동법학, 9 (1999), 한국노동법학회
- 이을행, "근로계약과 단체협약의 효력", 재산법연구, 14(1) (1997), 한국재산법학회
- 이종복, "노동조합법 제33조 1항의 단체교섭권의 의미", 판례월보, (255) (1991)
- 이춘우, "우리나라 노동조합과 노사협의회와의 관계에 관한 고찰", 행정연구, 2 (1984), 충남대학교 행정대학원
- 정명현, "‘퇴직후대우 조항’에 관한 단체협약의 법적 효력", 서울대학교 법학, 53(4), pp.161~185 (2012), 법학연구소
- 황용연, "복수노조시대의 노사협의회 운영 개선방안", 산업관계연구, 21(3), pp.33~57 (2011), 한국고용노사관계학회
- Gaylor, "The Legal Effect of Collective Agreement in Great Britain", Proceedings of New York University Six Annual Conference on Labour, pp.147~ (1953)
