동북아 국제질서의 구조적 특성과 한반도 문제 해결방향
Structural Characteristics of Northeast Asian Politics and Future Directions of Resolving Problems on the Korean Peninsula
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
Possibilities of making self-fulfilling roles for South Korea to resolve problems on the Korean peninsula are open since structural obstacles overcoming national separation become obsolete after the demise of the Cold War. Despite the fact that any optimism for the future is not allowed in the midst of political turmoils and changes in Northeast Asia, there are concrete ways of changing the future through the internal expansion of abilities and external utilization of security environment for the national integration of two Koreas. Two perspectives of ‘peninsularization of the Korean problem’ and ‘internationalization of the Korean problem’ are in conflict. But realistically, South Korea needs to consider both national and international aspects to resolve the problem. In other words, to have positive roles of domestic and international actors in the process of national unification, South Korea must seek incremental changes of the Northeast Asian security structure from bilateralism to multilateralism like the Northeast Asian multilateral security system.
참고문헌 (34)
- "동아시아 지역주의는 가능할 것인가 동북아시아에서의 경제협력의 정치경제" (2002), 세종연구소
- "한반도 통일과정에서 러시아의 역할" (1997), 민족통일연구원
- "한반도 평화체제 구축방안" (1995), 민족통일연구원
- "한반도 평화번영정책과 국가안보" (2004)
- "미국의 대테러전쟁과 한미동맹관계" (2003)
- "일본의 군사안보전략과 한반도" (2003), 통일연구원
- "미국의 동북아시아 지역질서 구상", 5(2) (2001)
- "한반도 평화체제에 대한 이론적 접근 구성주의의 비교" (2000), 통일연구원
- "9·11 이후 미국의 외교정책,”, 『9·11 테러이후 부시행정부의 한반도 정책" (2002), 김영사
- "한반도 군비통제의 재조명 문제점과 개선방향" (2000), 통일연구원
- "한반도 통일문제에 대한 주변4국의 입장 분석" (1997), 민족통일연구원
- "24 한국과 국제정치"
- "Security Policy Dynamics: Effects of Contextual Determinants to South Korea" (2001), Ashgate
- "The False Promise of International Institutions", 19(3) (1995)
- "The Center for International Affairs", HarvardUniversity
- "China-ROK Cooperation in East Asian Integration and Its Implications for the ROK-US Alliance" (2003), 한국국제정치학회·국방대 국제학술회의
- "“Regimeanalyse in KSZEProzeß ”Regime in den Interantionalen Beziehungen", (mos verlag)
- "The Geography of the Peace: East Asia in the Twenty-first Century", 23(4) (1999)
- "North Koreans and U.S. Plan Talks in Beijing" (2003)
- "A Tale of Two Realisms:Expanding the Institutions Debate,", 41. (1997)
- "U.S. Department of Defense. 2001" (2001), Government Printing Office
- "Structural Realism after the Cold War", 25(1) (2000)
- "동북아 국제질서의 구조적 특성과 한반도 문제 해결방향 27"
- "The Search for Foundation The Theory and Praxis of An Institutional Form", Columbia University Press
- Christoffersen, Gaye, "China and The Asia-Pacific", 36(11) (1996)
- CSIS Working Group Report, "A Blueprint for U.S. Policy towarda Unified Korea" (2002), Government Printing Office
- DiMaggio, "Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in OrganizationFields TheNew Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis", Universityof Chicago Press
- Gong, "Implications for the U.S.and Northeast Asia", 16
- Haas, "“The Uniting of Europe and the Uniting of LatinAmerica ”Journal of Common Market Studies", 5
- Hemmer, Christopher, "Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism", 56(3) (2002)
- Khalizad, Zalmay, "United States and Asia: Toward a New U.S.Strategy and Force Posture" (2003)
- "26 한국과 국제정치"
- Wendt, Alexander, "Constructing International Politics", 20(1) (1995)
- Wendt, "“The Agent-Structure Problem in InternationalRelations Theory", 41