본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Frustrated Nonphases as Catalysts for Phases - How Graph Theory Calculates Optimal Balance in Linguistic Fibonacci Trees and Graphs

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This article examines a graph-theoretical analysis of an externally merged VP as a derivational Fibonacci (F) tree, i.e., a structure written in a Lindenmayer grammar without a linearization condition. We aim to show that the computational procedures of a natural human language (CHL), which is a complex system, solve a dynamically frustrated equation (introduced by Philippe Binder, and proposed as a third factor by Juan Uriagereka) in the human brain. The relevant equation is Kirchhoff’s (electric) current law (KCL) AT y = f, which calculates the equilibrium (balance) in any network. Applying the standard graph-theoretical method, we calculate the hidden optimal balance among VP, vP, and CP as an F network. We calculate the potential (cumulative relative quantity of features) in each node and then the current (relative force of feature flow) along each edge. The graph theory shows that an externally merged antisymmetric VP with binary-node connections conceals an extremely symmetric balance (a KCL solution of zero), wherein almost all the edges disappear and the nodes are almost completely disconnected. In this scenario, KCL qualifies as a dynamically frustrated equation caught in a dilemma between two contradictory dynamics: symmetry breaking and symmetry generation. Our challenge is threefold. First, we aim to calculate the optimal balance hidden in sentential F trees. Second, we reassess Richard Kayne’s insightful “connectivity” proposal. Third, we propose a new hypothesis of phase existence. A frustrated nonphase catalyzes the creation of phases, forcing loop structures of feature inheritance and internal merges. These loops are nonzero solutions of the KCL.

Abstract

This article examines a graph-theoretical analysis of an externally merged VP as a derivational Fibonacci (F) tree, i.e., a structure written in a Lindenmayer grammar without a linearization condition. We aim to show that the computational procedures of a natural human language (CHL), which is a complex system, solve a dynamically frustrated equation (introduced by Philippe Binder, and proposed as a third factor by Juan Uriagereka) in the human brain. The relevant equation is Kirchhoff’s (electric) current law (KCL) AT y = f, which calculates the equilibrium (balance) in any network. Applying the standard graph-theoretical method, we calculate the hidden optimal balance among VP, vP, and CP as an F network. We calculate the potential (cumulative relative quantity of features) in each node and then the current (relative force of feature flow) along each edge. The graph theory shows that an externally merged antisymmetric VP with binary-node connections conceals an extremely symmetric balance (a KCL solution of zero), wherein almost all the edges disappear and the nodes are almost completely disconnected. In this scenario, KCL qualifies as a dynamically frustrated equation caught in a dilemma between two contradictory dynamics: symmetry breaking and symmetry generation. Our challenge is threefold. First, we aim to calculate the optimal balance hidden in sentential F trees. Second, we reassess Richard Kayne’s insightful “connectivity” proposal. Third, we propose a new hypothesis of phase existence. A frustrated nonphase catalyzes the creation of phases, forcing loop structures of feature inheritance and internal merges. These loops are nonzero solutions of the KCL.

참고문헌 (99)

  1. Arikawa, K., "Is word order asymmetry mathematically expressible?", Biolinguistics, 7, pp.276~300 (2013)
  2. Koji Arikawa, "Why Binary Merge?", Journal of Cognitive Science, 17(4), pp.499~546 (2016), 인지과학연구소[DOI]
  3. Arikawa, K., "Does Gaussian elimination teach about uninterpretable feature elimination", CHL? St. Andrew’s University Bulletin of the Research Institute, 42(3), pp.83~128 (2017)
  4. Arikawa, K, "Graph theory teaches us something about grammaticality", The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, (112), pp.55~82 (2019)
  5. Berwick, C. R., "Why Only Us : Language and Evolution" (2016), MIT Press
  6. Binder, P.-M., "Frustration in complexity", Science, 320(5874), pp.322~323 (2008)
  7. Boeckx, C., "Phases: Developing the Framework", pp.45~66 (2012), Mouton de Gruyter
  8. Bonet, E., "(In)direct Reference in the Phonology-Syntax Interface under Phase Theory: A Response to “Modular PIC” (D’Alessandro and Scheer 2015)", Linguistic Inquiry, 50, pp.751~777 (2019)
  9. Bošković, Ž., "What is Sent to Spell-Out is Phases, Not Phase Complements", ms, pp.2016
  10. Bruce, C., "Schrödinger’s Rabbits: The Many Worlds of Quantum" (2004), Joseph Henry Press
  11. Cassini, Jean-Dominique, "Une nouvelle progression de nombres", Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, 1
  12. Chomsky, N., "The Amherst lectures, unpublished lecture notes distributed by Documents Linguistiques", pp.1974
  13. Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  14. Chomsky, N., "Language and Problems of Knowledge" (1988), MIT Press
  15. Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  16. Chomsky, N., "New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  17. Chomsky, N., "Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  18. Chomsky, N., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  19. Chomsky, N., "The Generative Enterprise Revisited: Discussions with Riny Huybregts, Henk Riemsdijk, Naoki Fukui and Mihoko Zushi" (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
  20. Chomsky, N., "Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol.3", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
  21. Chomsky, N., "Three factors in language design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
  22. Chomsky, N., "Interface + Recursion = Language?", pp.1~29 (2007), Mouton de Gruyter
  23. Chomsky, N., "Foundational Issues in Linguistics Theory", pp.133~166 (2008), MIT Press
  24. Chomsky, N., "Of Minds & Language: A Dialogue with Noam Chomsky in the Basque Country", pp.13~43 (2009), Oxford University Press
  25. Chomsky, N., "The Science of Language : Interviews with James McGilvray" (2012), Cambridge University Press
  26. Chomsky, N., "Foreword to Phases: Developing the Framework", pp.1~8 (2012), Mouton de Gruyter
  27. Chomsky, N., "Problems of projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
  28. Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (2015), MIT Press
  29. Chomsky, N., "The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray" (2012), Cambridge University Press
  30. Collins, C., "A formalization of minimalist syntax", Syntax, 19(1), pp.43~78 (2016)
  31. Crease, R. P., "The Second Creation" (1987), MacMillan
  32. D’Alessandro, R., "Modular PIC", Linguistic Inquiry, 46, pp.593~624 (2015)
  33. "Soft mathematics: the mathematics of people. Resources for math and decision making: original articles, Mathematics awareness week 1996" (1996)[URL]
  34. David Embick, "Towards a computational(ist) neurobiology of language: correlational, integrated and explanatory neurolinguistics", Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(4), pp.357~366 (2014), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  35. Epstein, D. S., "Explorations in Maximizing Syntax Minimization", pp.98~115 (2015), Routledge
  36. Euclid, "Euclid: the Thirteen Books of the Elements: Translated with Introduction and Commentary by Sir Thomas Heath" (2000), Dover publications
  37. Everett, Hugh, "The many-worlds view interpretation of quantum physics", Ph. D., pp.1957
  38. Fukui, N., "Specifiers and projection", MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 8, pp.128~172 (1986)
  39. Fukui, N., "Symmetry in syntax : merge and demerge", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 7, pp.27~86 (1998)
  40. Idsardi, J. W., "Metrical combinatorics and the real half of the Fibonacci sequence", Biolinguistics, 3, pp.404~406 (2009)
  41. Jenkins, L., "Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  42. Johansson, S., "Biolinguistics or physicolinguistics? Is the third factor helpful or harmful in explaining language?", Biolinguistics, 7, pp.249~275 (2013)
  43. "A lecture given at the National Institute of Japanese Language and Linguistics", 2012
  44. Katz, J., "Realism vs. conceptualism in linguistics", Linguistics and Philosophy, 14, pp.515~554 (1991)
  45. Kayne, R., "Connectedness and Binary Branching" (1984), Foris publications
  46. Kayne, R., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
  47. "Annalen der Physik und Chemie", 1845, 487~514
  48. Kitagawa, Y., "Subjects in Japanese and English", Ph. D., pp.1986
  49. "Fibonacci numbers and the golden section" (2016)[URL]
  50. Koopman, H., "Subjects", Ms, pp.1988
  51. Krivochen, G. D., "Aspects of emergent cyclicity in language and computation", Ph.D., pp.2018
  52. Kuroda, S. -Y., "Whether we agree or not: a comparative syntax of English and Japanese", Papers from the Second International Workshop on Japanese Syntax, pp.103~143 (1988), Center for the study of language and information, Leland Stanford Junior University
  53. Langendoen, D. T., "The Vastness of Natural Languages" (1984), Blackwell
  54. Legate, A. J., "Phases: Developing the Framework", pp.233~250 (2012), Mouton de Gruyter
  55. Martin, E. S., "A Reference Grammar of Japanese" (2003), University Hawaii Press
  56. Medeiros, D, "Optimal growth in phrase structure", Biolinguistics, 2(2-3), pp.152~195 (2008)
  57. Medeiros, D., "Economy of command", Ph. D., pp.2012
  58. Medeiros, D., "Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences", pp.333~350 (2016), Cambridge University Press
  59. Morgan, T. J. H., "Experimental evidence for the co-evolution of hominin tool-making teaching and language", Nature Communications, 6, pp.1~8 (2015)
  60. Moro, A., "Dynamic Antisymmetry" (2000), MIT Press
  61. Müller, G., "Minimality Effects in Syntax", pp.289~325 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
  62. Nozaki, A., (2015), Koodansya
  63. Obata, M., "Root, successive-cyclic and feature-splitting internal merge: implications for feature inheritance and transfer", Doctor, pp.2010
  64. Obata, M., "Phases: Developing the Framework", pp.173~194 (2012), Mouton de Gruyter
  65. ús, R., R. Martin, "Mathematical foundation of matrix syntax", arXiv:1710.00372v1. Cornell University Library, ~ (2017)
  66. Piattelli-Palmarini, M., "Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics", pp.341~377 (2004), Elsevier
  67. Piattelli-Palmarini, M., "Still a bridge too far? Biolinguistic questions for grounding language on brains", Physics of Life Reviews, 5(4), pp.207~224 (2008)
  68. Piattelli-Palmarini, M., "Cambridge Companion to Chomsky" (2016), Cambridge University Press
  69. Postal, M. P., "Skeptical Linguistic Essays" (2004), Oxford University Press
  70. Postal, M., "The incoherence of Chomsky’s biolinguistic ontology", Biolinguistics, 3, pp.104~123 (2009)
  71. Prusinkiewicz, P., "The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants" (1990), Springer-Verlag
  72. Richards, D. M., "On feature inheritance: An argument from the Phase Impenetrability Condition", Linguistic Inquiry, 38, pp.563~572 (2007)
  73. Richards, D. M., "Phases: Developing the Framework", pp.195~232 (2012), Mouton de Gruyter
  74. Ross, R. John, "Constraints on variables in syntax", Doctor, pp.1967
  75. Saddy, D., "Measuring language", International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 14(2), pp.383~404 (2004)
  76. Saito, M., "(A) Case for labeling: labeling in languages without Phi-feature agreement", The Linguistic Review, 33, pp.129~175 (2016)
  77. Saito, M., "Phases and transfer domain: a case study from anaphor binding and locality of A-movement", A lecture given in the linguistics colloquium at Keio University (2017)
  78. Sato, S., (1998), Kodansya publications
  79. Schrödinger, E, "What is Life? and Mind and Matter", pp.1967~ (2012), Cambridge University Press
  80. Simson, Robert, "An explication of an obscure passage in Albert Girard’s commentary upon Simson Stevin’s works", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 48, pp.368~376
  81. Stewart, I., "Mathematics of Life: Unlocking the Secrets of Existence" (2011), Profile Books
  82. "Computational science and engineering. Lecture 13: Kirchhoff’s current law. Opencourseware" (2008)[URL]
  83. Strang, G., "Introduction to Linear Algebra" (2009), Wellesley-Cambridge Press
  84. "Diagonalization and powers of A. A video lecture (linear algebra, lecture 22) at MIT OpenCourseWare" (2011)[URL]
  85. Strang, G., "Computational Science and Engineering" (2012), Wellesley-Cambridge Press
  86. Strang, G., "Introduction to Linear Algebra" (2016), Wellesley-Cambridge Press
  87. Tegmark, M., "Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality" (2014), Penguin books
  88. Thompson, D’Arcy W., "On Growth and Form" (1917), Cambridge University Press
  89. Tobias, V., P., "The brain of Homo habilis: a new level of organization in cerebral evolution", Journal of Human Evolution, 16(7-8), pp.741~761 (1987)
  90. Trettenbrein, C. P., "50 years later: a conversation about the biological study of language with Noam Chomsky", Biolinguistics, 11 (2017)
  91. Uriagereka, J., "Working Minimalism", pp.251~282 (1999), MIT Press
  92. Uriagereka, J., "Rhyme and Reason: An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax" (2000), MIT Press
  93. Uriagereka, J, "Phases: Developing the Framework", pp.67~102 (2012), Mouton de Gruyter
  94. Uriagereka, J., "Spell-Out and the Minimalist Program" (2012), Oxford University Press
  95. Uriagereka, J., "Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the Interfaces", pp.363~391 (2014), John Benjamins
  96. Uriagereka, J., "“Natural” grammars and natural language", pp.665~674 (2015), Editorial de la Universidad del País Vasco
  97. Uriagereka, J., "On the algorithmic beauty of language", IAI Colloquium (2016), ISR UMD
  98. Von Baeyer, C. H., "Information : The New Language of Science" (2003), Harvard University Press
  99. Yoshinaga, Y., (2004), Kodansya

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)