본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Object Location Memory and Sex Difference: Implications on Static vs. Dynamic Navigation Environments

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In the present study, the effect of a two-type multimedia navigationenvironment (dynamic vs. static) was investigated on recall performancesof learners with different object location memory (OLM) spans (low vs. high). The OLM spans of 34 male and female undergraduate students weredetermined by a revised location memory test, and the students were separatedinto high and low groups. In a 2x2 nested ANOVA design, one group studiedthe static navigation environment, while the other explored the 3-D dynamicenvironment. While in the 3-D dynamic environment individuals navigatedthrough the smooth display of view changes; in the static environment, 2-Drepresentation of the 3-D real world, objects did not change with the movementof the observer. As participants finished the navigation task, they were givena spatial knowledge recall test. Findings indicated that learners showed higherrecall performances in the static environment than the dynamic environment. Gender differences were also observed in terms of recalling spatial knowledge,with males earning the highest scores in the dynamic navigation environment.

Abstract

In the present study, the effect of a two-type multimedia navigationenvironment (dynamic vs. static) was investigated on recall performancesof learners with different object location memory (OLM) spans (low vs. high). The OLM spans of 34 male and female undergraduate students weredetermined by a revised location memory test, and the students were separatedinto high and low groups. In a 2x2 nested ANOVA design, one group studiedthe static navigation environment, while the other explored the 3-D dynamicenvironment. While in the 3-D dynamic environment individuals navigatedthrough the smooth display of view changes; in the static environment, 2-Drepresentation of the 3-D real world, objects did not change with the movementof the observer. As participants finished the navigation task, they were givena spatial knowledge recall test. Findings indicated that learners showed higherrecall performances in the static environment than the dynamic environment. Gender differences were also observed in terms of recalling spatial knowledge,with males earning the highest scores in the dynamic navigation environment.

참고문헌 (62)

  1. Alexander, G.M, "Memory for face locations: Emotional processing alters spatial abilities", Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, pp.352~362 (2005)
  2. Alexander, G. M, "Sex and spatial position effects on object location memory following intentional learning of object identities", Neuropsychologia, 40, pp.1516~1522 (2002)
  3. Arthur, E. J, "The perception of spatial layout in real and virtual worlds", Ergonomics, 40(1), pp.69~77 (1997)
  4. Baddeley, A. D, "Recent advances in learning and motivation Vol. 8", pp.47~90 (1974), Academic Press
  5. Baddeley, A. D, "Attention and performance VIII", pp.521~539 (1980), Lawrence Erlbaum
  6. Burigat, S, "Navigation in 3D virtual environments: Effects of user experience and location-pointing navigation aids", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, pp.945~958 (2007)
  7. Choi, J, "Object location memory: A direct test of the verbal memory hypothesis", Learning and Individual Dif ferences, 15, pp.237~245 (2005)
  8. Christou, C. G, "View dependence in scene recognition after active learning", Memory and Cognition, 27, pp.996~1007 (1999)
  9. Cockburn, A, "3D or not 3D? Evaluating the effect of the third dimension in a document management system", Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’01, pp.434~441 (2001)
  10. Cohen, C. A, "Individual differences in use of external visualisations to perform an internal visualisation task", Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), pp.701~711 (2007)
  11. Dalgarno,B, "The Importance of Active Exploration, Optical Flow, and Task Alignment for Spatial Learning in Desktop 3D Environments", Human–Computer Interaction, 25(1), pp.25~66 (2010)
  12. Dalgarno, B, "User control and task authenticity for spatial learning in 3D environments", Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(101), pp.1~17 (2004)
  13. Dalgarno, B, "3D environments for spatial learning", the importance of learning task design Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, pp.7~10 (2003)
  14. DeGoede, M, "Gender differences in memory for objects and their locations: A study on automatic versus controlled encoding and retrieval contexts", Brain and Cognition, 66, pp.232~242 (2008)
  15. De Fretias, S, "The use of ‘exploratory learning’ for supporting immersive learning in virtual environments", Computers and Education, 52, pp.343~352 (2009)
  16. Eals, M, "The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays", Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, pp.95~105 (1994)
  17. "Object location memory" (1999)[URL]
  18. Froese, M.E, "Evaluation of Static and Dynamic Visualization Training Approaches for Users with Different Spatial Abilities", IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, (19), pp.2810~2817 (2013)
  19. Gallagher, P, "Sex differences in object location memory: some further methodological considerations", Learning and Individual Dif ferences, 16, pp.277~290 (2006)
  20. Garg, A. X, "Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning", Academic Medicine, 74, pp.S87~S89 (1999)
  21. Gerjets, P, "Goal configurations and processing strategies as moderators between instructional design and cognitive load: Evidence from hypertext-based instruction", Educational Psychologist, 38, pp.33~41 (2003)
  22. Gyselinck, V, "Working memory components and imagery instructions in the elaboration of a spatial mental model", Psychological Research, 71, pp.373~382 (2007)
  23. Hampton, R. R, "Hippocampal lesions impair memory for location but not color in passerine birds", Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, pp.831~835 (1996)
  24. Hoffler, T, "Spatial ability: Its influence on learning with visualizations— a meta-analytic review", Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), pp.245~269 (2010)
  25. Honda, A, "Sex differences in object location memory: The female advantage of immediate detection of changes", Learning and Individual Dif ferences, 19, pp.234~237 (2009)
  26. Hays, T.A, "Spatial abilities and the effects of computer animation on shortterm and long-term comprehension", Journal of educational computing research, 14(2), pp.139~155 (1996)
  27. Huk, T, "Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability", Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, pp.392~404 (2006)
  28. Iachini, T, "Gender differences in object location memory in a real three-dimensional environment", Brain & Cognition, 59(1), pp.52~59 (2005)
  29. James, T. W., "Sex differences in remembering the locations of objects in an array: Location-shifts versus location-exchanges", Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, pp.155~163 (1997)
  30. Kessels, R. P, "The modified location learning test: Norms for the assessment of spatial memory function in neuropsychological patients", Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(8), pp.841~846 (2006)
  31. Kimura, D, "Sex and cognition" (1999), MIT Press
  32. Lee, H, "Instructional design of web-based simulations for learners with different levels of spatial ability", Instructional Science, 35(6), pp.467~479 (2007)
  33. Lejbak, M, "The female advantage in object location memory is robust to verbalizability and mode of presentation of test stimuli", Brain and Cognition, 69(1), pp.148~153 (2009)
  34. Linn, M. C, "Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis", Child Development, 56, pp.1479~1498 (1985)
  35. Logie, R. H, "Visuo-spatial working memory" (1995), Lawrence Erlbaum
  36. Mecklinger, A, "On the modularity of recognition memory for object form and spatial location: A topographic ERP analysis", Neuropsychologia, 36(5), pp.441~460 (1998)
  37. McBurney, D. H, "Superior spatial memory of women : Stronger evidence for the gathering hypothesis", Evolution and Human Behavior, 18(3), pp.165~174 (1997)
  38. McGee, M. G, "Human spatial abilities : psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences", Psychological bulletin, 86(5), pp.889~ (1979)
  39. McGivern, R. F, "Gender differences in incidental learning and visual recognition memory : Support for a sex difference in unconscious environmental awareness", Personality and Individual Dif ferences, 25(2), pp.223~232 (1998)
  40. Mennecke, B. E, "The effects of media and task on user performance: A test of the task-media fit hypothesis", Group Decision and Negotiation, 9, pp.507~529 (2000)
  41. Mutlu Bayraktar, D, "The effect of multimedia design types on learners’ recall performances with varying short term memory spans", Multimedia Tools and Applications (2012)
  42. Newby, T. J, "Instructional technology for teaching and learning designing instruction, integrating computers and using media" (2000), Prentice-Hall
  43. Nizam, N, "A comparative study of navigation using single vs. community driven tag clouds on websites", Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), pp.1~4 (2012)
  44. Ozdinc, F, "Üç-Boyutlu Çok-Kullanıcılı Sanal Ortamların Oryantasyon Amaçlı Kullanılması", 석사, pp.2010
  45. Paas, F, "Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments", Educational Psychologist, 38(1), pp.1~4 (2003)
  46. Pallant, J, "SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows" (2007), Open University Press
  47. Peruch, P, "Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge through Visual Exploration of Simulated Environments", Ecological Psychology, 7(1), pp.1~20 (1995)
  48. Postma, A, "What was where? Memory for object locations", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(1), pp.178~199 (1996)
  49. Postma, A, "Sex differences in object location memory", Brain & Cognition, 36(3), pp.334~345 (1998)
  50. Postma, A, "Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory", Brain & Cognition, 54(1), pp.24~34 (2004)
  51. Rizk-Jackson, A, "Effects of sex on object recognition and spatial navigation in humans", Behavioral Brain Research, 173, pp.181~190 (2006)
  52. Ruddle, R. A, "Navigating buildings in “desk-top” virtual environments: Experimental investigations using extended navigational experience", Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3(2), pp.143~159 (1997)
  53. Schmitz, S, "Gender differences in acquisition of environmental knowledge related to way finding behavior, spatial anxiety and self-estimated environmental competencies", Sex Roles, 41, pp.71~93 (1999)
  54. Siegel, A. W, "Advances in child development", pp.37~55 (1975), Academic Press
  55. Silverman, I, "The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture", pp.533~549 (1992), Oxford University Press
  56. Silverman, I, "The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries", Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, pp.261~268 (2007)
  57. Smith, E.E, "Spatial versus Object Working Memory: PET Investigations", Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, (7), pp.337~356 (1995)
  58. Spiers, M. V, "Sex differences in spatial object-location memory in a virtual grocery store", Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(4), pp.471~473 (2008)
  59. Tottenham, L. S, "Female advantage for spatial location memory in both static and dynamic environments", Brain & Cognition, 53, pp.381~383 (2003)
  60. Voyer, D, "Gender differences in object location memory: A meta-analysis", Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(1), pp.23~38 (2007)
  61. Wilson, P. N, "Active exploration of a virtual environment does not promote orientation or memory for objects", Environment and Behavior, 31(6), pp.752~763 (1997)
  62. Zimmer, H. D, "Spatio-temporal working-memory and short-term object-location tasks use different memory mechanisms", Acta Psychologica, (114), pp.41~65 (2002)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)