월경통 환자에 대한 한방진단시스템의 진단일치도 연구
A Study for Diagnostic Correspondent Rates between DSOM and Korean Medical Doctors' Diagnosis about Menstrual Pain
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: Diagnosis System of Oriental Medicine (DSOM) was made as a computerized assistant program for oriental medicine doctors to be able to diagnose with statistical basis. Then DSOM uses questionnaires filled out by respondents with explanatory guide. But if the respondents misunderstand the meaning of the passages, the results were quite the opposite. Methods: This study was designed to investigate the diagnostic correspondent rates between DSOM and TKM practitioners. First, let the respondents answer to DSOM. After that, three doctors diagnosed the respondents and marked ‘p’ when they diagnose that the respondent had the pathogenic factors, marked ‘n’ when they diagnose that the respondent had the pathogenic factors but not severs, and did not marked when they diagnose that the respondent didn’t have the pathogenic factors. Finally, this study was investigated the correspondent rates of diagnosis between DSOM and doctors. Results: In the pathogenic factor of three including insufficiency of Yin (陰虛), the correspondent rates were 90%. In the pathogenic factor of nine including deficiency of qi (氣虛), the correspondent rates were 80%. In the pathogenic factor of four including blood stasis (血瘀), the correspondent rates were 70%. In HH and HL, they showed the correspondent rates of 61.77%. The correspondent rate of heat (熱) was highest (96.88%). The correspondent rate of insufficiency of Yang (陽虛) was lowest (0%). In LH and LL, they showed the correspondent rates of 88.31%. The correspondent rate of blood stasis (血瘀) was lowest (71.76%). They all showed the correspondent rates of over 70%. Conclusions: In DSOM and Doctors' diagnose, they showed the correspondent rates of 83.60%.
Abstract
Objectives: Diagnosis System of Oriental Medicine (DSOM) was made as a computerized assistant program for oriental medicine doctors to be able to diagnose with statistical basis. Then DSOM uses questionnaires filled out by respondents with explanatory guide. But if the respondents misunderstand the meaning of the passages, the results were quite the opposite. Methods: This study was designed to investigate the diagnostic correspondent rates between DSOM and TKM practitioners. First, let the respondents answer to DSOM. After that, three doctors diagnosed the respondents and marked ‘p’ when they diagnose that the respondent had the pathogenic factors, marked ‘n’ when they diagnose that the respondent had the pathogenic factors but not severs, and did not marked when they diagnose that the respondent didn’t have the pathogenic factors. Finally, this study was investigated the correspondent rates of diagnosis between DSOM and doctors. Results: In the pathogenic factor of three including insufficiency of Yin (陰虛), the correspondent rates were 90%. In the pathogenic factor of nine including deficiency of qi (氣虛), the correspondent rates were 80%. In the pathogenic factor of four including blood stasis (血瘀), the correspondent rates were 70%. In HH and HL, they showed the correspondent rates of 61.77%. The correspondent rate of heat (熱) was highest (96.88%). The correspondent rate of insufficiency of Yang (陽虛) was lowest (0%). In LH and LL, they showed the correspondent rates of 88.31%. The correspondent rate of blood stasis (血瘀) was lowest (71.76%). They all showed the correspondent rates of over 70%. Conclusions: In DSOM and Doctors' diagnose, they showed the correspondent rates of 83.60%.
참고문헌 (14)
- "Diagnosis System of Oriental Medicine" (2005)[URL]
- 이인선, "자궁근종 치료환자를 대상으로 한 DSOM 진단정확도에 대한 연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 20(3), pp.740~747 (2006), 한의병리학회
- Jeon RH, "Research and Development on Online Program of Oriental Medicine Diagnosis by Principal Component Analysis", The Journal of Oriental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 11(2), pp.290~301 (1998)
- Jeon RH, "Research on the Type of Differentiation of Symptoms and Signs for the Oriental Gynecology", The Journal of Oriental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 12(1), pp.231~252 (1999)
- 배경미, "한방부인과 辨證 診斷 설문지에 대한 評價와 硏究", 대한한방부인과학회지, 15(4), pp.111~127 (2002), 대한한방부인과학회
- 이인선, "한방부인과 진단용 설문지의 病機 연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 18(2), pp.401~407 (2004), 한의병리학회
- 이인선, "한방부인과 진단용 설문지의 신뢰도 연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 18(3), pp.701~712 (2004), 한의병리학회
- 이인선, "한방부인과 진단 설문지에 대한 평가와 硏究(Ⅱ)", 대한한방부인과학회지, 17(1), pp.160~166 (2004), 대한한방부인과학회
- 민병화, "韓方婦人科 診斷設問紙의 信賴度硏究", 대한한의학회지, 26(2), pp.126~139 (2005), 대한한의학회
- 김미진, "한방진단설문지 DSOM (r) S.1.1의 신뢰도연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 19(5), pp.1146~1153 (2005), 한의병리학회
- 이인선, "한방부인과 진단 설문지의 병기가중치 부여연구", 대한한방부인과학회지, 18(4), pp.119~135 (2005), 대한한방부인과학회
- 이인선, "한방진단시스템과 진단의 간의 진단일치도 연구", 동의생리병리학회지, 22(6), pp.1359~1367 (2008), 한의병리학회
- Kim DH, "Huangdi’s Internal Classic Miraculous Pivot", pp.70~73 (2002), Euiseongdang
- Kim DH, "Huangdi’s Internal Classic Plain Questions(上)", pp.7~25 (2001), Euiseongdang
