Comparison of Predictive Factors for Postoperative Incontinence of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate by the Surgeons’ Experience During Learning Curve
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To detect predictive factors for postoperative incontinence following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (Ho- LEP) according to surgeon experience (beginner or experienced) and preoperative clinical data. Methods: Of 224 patients, a total of 203 with available data on incontinence were investigated. The potential predictive factors for post-HoLEP incontinence included clinical factors, such as patient age, and preoperative urodynamic study results, including detrusor overactivity (DO). We also classified the surgeons performing the procedure according to their HoLEP experience: beginner (<21 cases) and experienced (≥21 cases). Results: Our statistical data showed DO was a significant predictive factor at the super-short period (the next day of catheter removal: odds ratio [OR], 3.375; P=0.000). Additionally, patient age, surgeon mentorship (inverse correlation), and prostate volume were significant predictive factors at the 1-month interval after HoLEP (OR, 1.072; P=0.004; OR, 0.251; P=0.002; and OR, 1.008; P=0.049, respectively). With regards to surgeon experience, DO and preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (inverse) at the super-short period, and patient age and mentorship (inverse correlation) at the 1-month interval after HoLEP (OR, 3.952; P=0.002; OR, 1.084; P=0.015; and OR,1.084; P=0.015; OR, 0.358; P=0.003, respectively) were significant predictive factors for beginners, and first desire to void (FDV) at 1 month after HoLEP (OR, 1.009; P=0.012) was a significant predictive factor for experienced surgeons in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Preoperative DO, IPSS, patient age, and surgeon mentorship were significant predictive factors of postoperative patient incontinence for beginner surgeons, while FDV was a significant predictive factors for experienced surgeons. These findings should be taken into account by surgeons performing HoLEP to maximize the patient’s quality of life with regards to urinary continence.
Abstract
Purpose: To detect predictive factors for postoperative incontinence following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (Ho- LEP) according to surgeon experience (beginner or experienced) and preoperative clinical data. Methods: Of 224 patients, a total of 203 with available data on incontinence were investigated. The potential predictive factors for post-HoLEP incontinence included clinical factors, such as patient age, and preoperative urodynamic study results, including detrusor overactivity (DO). We also classified the surgeons performing the procedure according to their HoLEP experience: beginner (<21 cases) and experienced (≥21 cases). Results: Our statistical data showed DO was a significant predictive factor at the super-short period (the next day of catheter removal: odds ratio [OR], 3.375; P=0.000). Additionally, patient age, surgeon mentorship (inverse correlation), and prostate volume were significant predictive factors at the 1-month interval after HoLEP (OR, 1.072; P=0.004; OR, 0.251; P=0.002; and OR, 1.008; P=0.049, respectively). With regards to surgeon experience, DO and preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (inverse) at the super-short period, and patient age and mentorship (inverse correlation) at the 1-month interval after HoLEP (OR, 3.952; P=0.002; OR, 1.084; P=0.015; and OR,1.084; P=0.015; OR, 0.358; P=0.003, respectively) were significant predictive factors for beginners, and first desire to void (FDV) at 1 month after HoLEP (OR, 1.009; P=0.012) was a significant predictive factor for experienced surgeons in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Preoperative DO, IPSS, patient age, and surgeon mentorship were significant predictive factors of postoperative patient incontinence for beginner surgeons, while FDV was a significant predictive factors for experienced surgeons. These findings should be taken into account by surgeons performing HoLEP to maximize the patient’s quality of life with regards to urinary continence.
참고문헌 (23)
- Elzayat EA, "Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a size-independent new “gold standard”", Urology, 66(5 Suppl), pp.108~113 (2005)
- 조강준, "Preoperative Factors Affecting Postoperative Early Quality of Life During the Learning Curve of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate", International Neurourology Journal, 17(2), pp.83~89 (2013), 대한배뇨장애요실금학회[DOI]
- Kelly DC, "Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia", Can J Urol, 19, pp.6131~6134 (2012)
- Cho MC, "Predictor of de novo urinary incontinence following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate", Neurourol Urodyn, 30, pp.1343~1349 (2011)
- Montorsi F, "Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center, prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia", J Urol, 172(5 Pt 1), pp.1926~1929 (2004)
- Lerner LB, "Stress incontinence during the learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate", J Endourol, 24, pp.1655~1658 (2010)
- 김명, "Technical Aspects of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia", Investigative and Clinical Urology, 54(9), pp.570~579 (2013), 대한비뇨기과학회
- Kwon O, "Effect of holmium laser enucleation of prostate on overactive bladder symptoms and urodynamic parameters: a prospective study", Urology, 83, pp.f581~5 (2014)
- Abrams P, "The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function:report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society", Neurourol Urodyn, 21, pp.167~178 (2002)
- Cartwright R, "What was “hot” at the ICS Annual Meeting San Francisco 2009", Neurourol Urodyn, 29, pp.21~27 (2010)
- Brown DM, "The urethral pressure profile", Br J Urol, 51, pp.211~217 (1969)
- Haraguchi T, "The relationship between the reproducibility of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and prostate size over the learning curve", Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 12, pp.281~284 (2009)
- Aho T, "Description of a modular mentorship programme for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate", World J Urol, 33, pp.497~502 (2015)
- Wilson LC, "A randomised trial comparing holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in the treatment of prostates larger than 40 grams: results at 2 years", Eur Urol, 50, pp.569~573 (2006)
- Du C, "Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate:the safety, efficacy, and learning experience in China", J Endourol, 22, pp.1031~1036 (2008)
- Endo F, "Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP: a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence", Urology, 76, pp.1451~1455 (2010)
- Shenoy SP, "Anteroposterior dissection HoLEP: a modification to prevent transient stress urinary incontinence (Urology 2010;76:1451-1456)", Urology, 77, pp.1510~1511 (2011)
- Elmansy HM, "Is there a way to predict stress urinary incontinence after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate?", J Urol, 186, pp.1977~1981 (2011)
- 배정범, "Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Seoul National University Hospital Experience", International Neurourology Journal, 15(1), pp.29~34 (2011), 대한배뇨장애요실금학회
- Shah HN, "Peri-operative complications of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: experience in the first 280 patients, and a review of literature", BJU Int, 100, pp.94~101 (2007)
- Jeong CW, "Enucleation ratio efficacy might be a better predictor to assess learning curve of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate", Int Braz J Urol, 38, pp.362~371 (2012)
- 황진철, "Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Effectiveness, Safety, and Overcoming of the Learning Curve", Investigative and Clinical Urology, 51(9), pp.619~624 (2010), 대한비뇨기과학회
- Bruschini H, "Urinary incontinence following surgery for BPH: the role of aging on the incidence of bladder dysfunction", Int Braz J Urol, 37, pp.380~386 (2011)