논문의 주저자 결정에 미치는 영향
Effect of The First Authors Determine to Paper
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to examine the professors, who teach the dental hygiene program in Korea,their Awareness on authors determined among research ethics. Three hundred and six full time professors and four hundred and eighty four part time professors in seventy eight universities all around Korea were surveyed. The following are the results that the collected data was carried out statistical analysis by using SPSS 12.0 program. The results was as followed. 1. The present study's author makers, 95 respondents (55.6%) experienced advising professor and 67 respondents (39.2%) experienced personally. 2. As recognition about range and order decision of the authors, they expressed the biggest recognition that person who did the interpretation of the results or gave important information doesn't always become the first author of the article(2.81±.485). 3. Between general characteristics and authorship recognition level, they were statistically significantly different with number of articles published as the first author(p<0.05). 4. Regarding the correlation between students who helped with collection of data and references also have the right to be the author of the research article and Person who did the rough draft translation also has the right to be the co-author of the research article had a statistically significant correlation of .433 which was the highest correlation factor (p<0.01). Conclusions, rules and regulations on research ethic should be more publicized through educational institutions.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the professors, who teach the dental hygiene program in Korea,their Awareness on authors determined among research ethics. Three hundred and six full time professors and four hundred and eighty four part time professors in seventy eight universities all around Korea were surveyed. The following are the results that the collected data was carried out statistical analysis by using SPSS 12.0 program. The results was as followed. 1. The present study's author makers, 95 respondents (55.6%) experienced advising professor and 67 respondents (39.2%) experienced personally. 2. As recognition about range and order decision of the authors, they expressed the biggest recognition that person who did the interpretation of the results or gave important information doesn't always become the first author of the article(2.81±.485). 3. Between general characteristics and authorship recognition level, they were statistically significantly different with number of articles published as the first author(p<0.05). 4. Regarding the correlation between students who helped with collection of data and references also have the right to be the author of the research article and Person who did the rough draft translation also has the right to be the co-author of the research article had a statistically significant correlation of .433 which was the highest correlation factor (p<0.01). Conclusions, rules and regulations on research ethic should be more publicized through educational institutions.
참고문헌 (17)
- Andersen D, "From case Management to Prevention of Scientific Dishonesty in Denmark", Sci Eng Ethics, 6(1), pp.25~34 (2000)
- Bayles M, "Professional Ethic.2nd ed" (1998), Wadsworth
- 교육인적자원부, "연구윤리.진실성 확보를 위한 지침 해설서,교육인적자원부" (2006), 교육인적자원부, 한국학술진흥재단
- 교육인적자원부, "연구윤리소개" (2006), 교육인적자원부, 한국학술진흥재단
- 최경희, "과학의 윤리적 특성에 대한 교수-학습의 모형 과 전략", 한국생명윤리학회지, 1(1), pp.26~40 (2000)
- 서은주, "생명과학 연구자들의 연구윤리 인식에 관한 조사", 석사, pp.2008
- Digiusto E, "Equity in authorship:a strategy for assigning credit when publishing", Soc Sci & Med, 38(1), pp.55~58 (1994)
- 강은희, "연구윤리에 대한 생명과학자들의 의견 및 인식조사", 석사, pp.2007
- 김송희, "생명과학 연구자들의 자료처리 및 논문발표에 대한 인 식을 바탕으로 한 연구윤리 교육의 방향 모색", 석사, pp.2008
- 최병인, "한국의 생명과학 연구윤리제도의 발전방향에 관한 연 구", 박사, pp.2006
- Kassiree JP, "On Authorship and Acknowledgement", N Engl J Med, 325, pp.1510~1512 (1991)
- ICMJE, "Statements from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors", Journal of the American Medical Association, 265(20), pp.2697~2698 (1991)
- 황은성, "연구윤리 선진국을 향하여" (2008), 교육과학기술부, 한국학술진흥재단
- 강명신, "치의학연구 윤리" (2010), 서울대학교 치의학대학원
- 정규언, "연구 부정행위의 판단기준: 고려대학교 연구윤리지침 을 중심으로", 한국사회복지학회 창립 50주년 기념 2007년 세계 학술대회, 연세대학교, 서울, pp.97~101 (2007)
- 홍석영, "학술논문 저자자격에 대한 생명과학 연구자들의 인식과 논의", 한국의료윤리학회지, 8(1), pp.60~72 (2005), 한국의료윤리학회
- Huth EJ, "Guideline on Authorship of Medical Paper", Ann Intern Med, 104(2), pp.269~274 (1986)