Effectiveness of the Invisalign Mandibular Advancement Appliance in Children with Class II Division 1 Malocclusion
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: This study aimed to determine the skeletal and dental effects in pediatric and adolescent Korean patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated using the Invisalign Mandibular Advancement (MAⓇ) appliance. Methods: The study included patients aged 6 to 18 years who received orthodontic treatment with the MAⓇ appliance for Class II Division 1 malocclusion at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Wonkwnag University Daejeon Dental Hospital, between July 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. The treatment group consisted of 20 patients, 10 boys and 10 girls. The control participants were also 10 boys and 10 girls. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment, and 41 measurements of skeletal and dental changes were measured and analyzed using the V-CephTM 8.0 (Osstem Implant). All analyses were performed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS for Windows, ver 26.0; IBM Corp.), and statistical significance was tested using paired and independent samples t-tests for within-group and between-group comparisons, respectively. Results: The patients in the treatment group showed significant decreases in ANB (A point, Nasion, B point), maxillary protrusion, maxillary anterior incisor labial inclination, and maxillary protrusion after treatment. However, when compared with the growth changes observed in the control group, only ANB and maxillary protrusion decreased, with no significant differences in SNA, SNB, and mandibular length. Conclusion: Collectively, the results of this study confirm that the use of MAⓇ appliance in pediatric and adolescent Korean patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion results in a reduction of anteroposterior skeletal and dental disharmony.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to determine the skeletal and dental effects in pediatric and adolescent Korean patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated using the Invisalign Mandibular Advancement (MAⓇ) appliance. Methods: The study included patients aged 6 to 18 years who received orthodontic treatment with the MAⓇ appliance for Class II Division 1 malocclusion at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Wonkwnag University Daejeon Dental Hospital, between July 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. The treatment group consisted of 20 patients, 10 boys and 10 girls. The control participants were also 10 boys and 10 girls. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken before and after treatment, and 41 measurements of skeletal and dental changes were measured and analyzed using the V-CephTM 8.0 (Osstem Implant). All analyses were performed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS for Windows, ver 26.0; IBM Corp.), and statistical significance was tested using paired and independent samples t-tests for within-group and between-group comparisons, respectively. Results: The patients in the treatment group showed significant decreases in ANB (A point, Nasion, B point), maxillary protrusion, maxillary anterior incisor labial inclination, and maxillary protrusion after treatment. However, when compared with the growth changes observed in the control group, only ANB and maxillary protrusion decreased, with no significant differences in SNA, SNB, and mandibular length. Conclusion: Collectively, the results of this study confirm that the use of MAⓇ appliance in pediatric and adolescent Korean patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion results in a reduction of anteroposterior skeletal and dental disharmony.
참고문헌 (16)
- Kesling HD, "The philosophy of the tooth positioning appliance", Am J Orthod Oral Surg, 31, pp.297~304 (1945)[DOI]
- Hennessy J, "Clear aligners generations and orthodontic tooth movement", J Orthod, 43, pp.68~76 (2016)[DOI]
- Cozza P, "Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, pp.e1~e12 (2006)[DOI]
- McLain JB, "Oral health status in the United States : prevalence of malocclusion", J Dent Educ, 49, pp.386~397 (1985)
- Blackham SS, "A study of short-term skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of Class II malocclusions treated with Invisalign Ⓡ with Mandibular Advancement Feature or Twin Block appliance compared with historical controls", doctor, pp.2020
- Caruso S, "Mandibular advancement with clear aligners in the treatment of skeletal Class II. A retrospective controlled study", Eur J Paediatr Dent, 22, pp.26~30 (2021)[DOI]
- Ravera S, "Short term dentoskeletal effects of mandibular advancement clear aligners in Class II growing patients. A prospective controlled study according to STROBE Guidelines", Eur J Paediatr Dent, 22, pp.119~124 (2021)[DOI]
- Koukou M, "Orthodontic management of skeletal Class II malocclusion with the Invisalign Mandibular Advancement Feature appliance : a case report and review of the literature", Case Rep Dent, 2022, pp.7095467~ (2022)[DOI]
- McDonald RE, "Dentistry for the child and adolescent", pp.673~ (2004), Mosby
- Sabouni W, "Invisalign treatment with mandibular advancement : a retrospective cohort cephalometric appraisal", J Clin Imaging Sci, 12, pp.42~ (2022)[DOI]
- Wu Y, "Does mandibular advancement with clear aligners have the same skeletal and dentoalveolar effects as traditional functional appliances?", BMC Oral Health, 23, pp.65~ (2023)[DOI]
- Lerstøl M, "Long-term stability of dentoalveolar and skeletal changes after activatorheadgear treatment", Eur J Orthod, 32, pp.28~35 (2010)[DOI]
- Antonarakis GS, "Short-term anteroposterior treatment effects of functional appliances and extraoral traction on class II malocclusion. A meta-analysis", Angle Orthod, 77, pp.907~914 (2007)[DOI]
- Ehsani S, "Short-term treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Eur J Orthod, 37, pp.170~176 (2015)[DOI]
- Atresh A, "Three-dimensional treatment outcomes in Class II patients with different vertical facial patterns treated with the Herbst appliance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 154, pp.238~248 (2018)[DOI]