본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A comparative study of high-dose hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin for intractable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

초록

Background/Aims: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has long been used as a palliative therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). High-dose hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has showed favorable outcomes in patients with intractable, advanced HCC. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of high-dose HAIC and conventional TACE using doxorubicin for advanced HCC. Methods: The high-dose HAIC group comprised 36 patients who were enrolled prospectively from six institutions. The enrollment criteria were good liver function, main portal vein invasion (including vascular shunt), infiltrative type, bilobar involvement, and/or refractory to prior conventional treatment (TACE, radiofrequency ablation, or percutaneous ethanol injection), and documented progressive disease. Patients received 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 on days 1~3) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 2 every 4 weeks) via an implantable port system. In the TACE group, 31 patients with characteristics similar to those in the high-dose HAIC group were recruited retrospectively from a single center. Patients underwent a transarterial infusion of doxorubicin every 4~8 weeks. Results: Overall, 6 patients (8.9%) achieved a partial response and 20 patients (29.8%) had stable disease. The objective response rate (complete response+partial response) was significantly better in the high-dose HAIC group than in the TACE group (16.7% vs. 0%, P=0.030). Overall survival was longer in the high-dose HAIC group than in the TACE group (median survival, 193 vs. 119 days; P=0.026). There were no serious adverse effects in the high-dose HAIC group, while hepatic complications occurred more often in the TACE group. Conclusions: High-dose HAIC appears to improve the tumor response and survival outcome compared to conventional TACE using doxorubicin in patients with intractable, advanced HCC.

Abstract

Background/Aims: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has long been used as a palliative therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). High-dose hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has showed favorable outcomes in patients with intractable, advanced HCC. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of high-dose HAIC and conventional TACE using doxorubicin for advanced HCC. Methods: The high-dose HAIC group comprised 36 patients who were enrolled prospectively from six institutions. The enrollment criteria were good liver function, main portal vein invasion (including vascular shunt), infiltrative type, bilobar involvement, and/or refractory to prior conventional treatment (TACE, radiofrequency ablation, or percutaneous ethanol injection), and documented progressive disease. Patients received 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 on days 1~3) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 2 every 4 weeks) via an implantable port system. In the TACE group, 31 patients with characteristics similar to those in the high-dose HAIC group were recruited retrospectively from a single center. Patients underwent a transarterial infusion of doxorubicin every 4~8 weeks. Results: Overall, 6 patients (8.9%) achieved a partial response and 20 patients (29.8%) had stable disease. The objective response rate (complete response+partial response) was significantly better in the high-dose HAIC group than in the TACE group (16.7% vs. 0%, P=0.030). Overall survival was longer in the high-dose HAIC group than in the TACE group (median survival, 193 vs. 119 days; P=0.026). There were no serious adverse effects in the high-dose HAIC group, while hepatic complications occurred more often in the TACE group. Conclusions: High-dose HAIC appears to improve the tumor response and survival outcome compared to conventional TACE using doxorubicin in patients with intractable, advanced HCC.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Parkin DM, "Global cancer statistics, 2002", CA Cancer J Clin, 55, pp.74~108 (2005)
  2. Levy AE, "Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: the need for an individualized multidisciplinary approach", J Clin Gastroenterol, 33, pp.180~182 (2001)
  3. Llovet JM, "Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma", J Natl Cancer Inst, 100, pp.698~711 (2008)
  4. Jang JW, "A combination therapy with transarterial chemo-lipiodolization and systemic chemo-infusion for large extensive hepatocellular carcinoma invading portal vein in comparison with conservative management", Cancer Chemother Pharmacol, 59, pp.9~15 (2007)
  5. Groupe d'Etude et de Traitement du Carcinome Hépatocellulaire, "A comparison of lipiodol chemoembolization and conservative treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma", N Engl J Med, 332, pp.1256~1261 (1995)
  6. Llovet JM, "Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial", Lancet, 359, pp.1734~1739 (2002)
  7. Tanioka H, "Combination chemotherapy with continuous 5-fluorouracil and low-dose cisplatin infusion for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma", Anticancer Res, 23, pp.1891~1897 (2003)
  8. Seno H, "Efficacy of an implanted drug delivery system for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and mitomycin C", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 14, pp.811~816 (1999)
  9. Ando E, "Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: analysis of 48 cases", Cancer, 95, pp.588~595 (2002)
  10. Murata K, "Low-dose chemotherapy of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil or doxorubicin via implanted fusion port for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma", Anticancer Res, 23, pp.1719~1722 (2003)
  11. Park JY, "Repetitive short-course hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with high-dose 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma", Cancer, 110, pp.129~137 (2007)
  12. Atiq OT, "Treatment of unresectable primary liver cancer with intrahepatic fluorodeoxyuridine and mitomycin C through an implantable pump", Cancer, 69, pp.920~924 (1992)
  13. Woo HY, "A randomized comparative study of high-dose and low-dose hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for intractable, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma", ncer Chemother Pharmacol, 65, pp.373~382 (2010)
  14. Bruix J, "Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference", J Hepatol, 35, pp.421~430 (2001), European Association for the Study of the Liver
  15. "Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP); Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0. 2006/<"[URL]
  16. Llovet JM, "Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival", Hepatology, 37, pp.429~442 (2003)
  17. Molinari M, "Transarterial chemoembolisation for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: results from a North American cancer centre", Clin Oncol, 18, pp.684~692 (2006)
  18. Villa E, "Natural history of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma: estrogen receptors' status in the tumor is the strongest prognostic factor for survival", Hepatology, 32, pp.233~238 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

Bi-monthly hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy as a novel strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in decompensated cirrhotic patientsAkira Mitoro, Akitoshi Douhara, Hideto Kawaratani, Hiroaki Takaya, Hitoshi Yoshiji, Junichi Yamao, Kei Moriya, Koh Kitagawa, Kosuke Kaji, Masanori Furukawa, Naotaka Shimozato, Shinya Sato, Soichiro Saikawa, Tadashi Namisaki, Takemi Akahane, Yasuhiko Sawada대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2019 · 제25권 제4호Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma as firstline therapy오명진, 이시형, 이헌주대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2013 · 제19권 제3호Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of chemo-diversityHideki Iwamoto, Shigeo Shimose, Takashi Niizeki, Takumi Kawaguchi, Tomotake Shirono대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2023 · 제29권 제3호Comparison of Sorafenib versus Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy-Based Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis김태형, 서연석, 임형준, Ahn Young Eun, Byun Kwan Soo, Jung Young Kul, Kang Seong Hee, Kim Hae Rim, Kim Ji Hoon, Lee Young Sun, Suh Sang Jun, Um Soon Ho, Yeon Jong Eun, Yim Sun Young, Yoon Eileen L.거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2021 · 제15권 제2호Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Microsphere Embolic Agents for Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma PatientsChia-Ying Lin, Ming-Ching Ou, Ming-Tsung Chuang, Shao-Hua Lee, Ya-Chun Hsu, Yi-Sheng Liu대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제1호What Is the Most Effective Drug Delivery System for Cisplatin during the Treatment of Hepatic Tumors with Single-Session Transcatheter Chemotherapy? A Pilot StudyFumitaka Suzuki, Hiromitsu Kumada, Hitomi Sezaki, Kenji Ikeda, Masahiro Kobayashi, Norio Akuta, Satoshi Saitoh, Taito Fukushima, Tasuku Hara, Tetsuya Hosaka, Yasuji Arase, Yoshiyuki Suzuki, Yusuke Kawamura, Yuya Seko거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2013 · 제7권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)