본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Impact of everolimus on survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Background/Aims: This study aimed to investigate whether everolimus (EVR) affects long-term survival after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: The data from 303 consecutive patients with HCC who had undergone LT from January 2012 to July 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 1) patients treated with EVR in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (EVR group; n=114) and 2) patients treated with CNI-based therapy without EVR (non-EVR group; n=189). Time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) after propensity score (PS) matching were compared between the groups, and prognostic factors for TTR and OS were evaluated. Results: The EVR group exhibited more aggressive tumor biology than the non-EVR group, such as a higher number of tumors (P=0.003), a higher prevalence of microscopic vascular invasion (P=0.017) and exceeding Milan criteria (P=0.029). Compared with the PS-matched non-EVR group, the PS-matched EVR group had significantly better TTR (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, EVR was identified as an independent prognostic factor for TTR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.248; P=0.001) and OS (HR, 0.145; P<0.001). Conclusions: Combined with CNIs, EVR has the potential to prolong long-term survival in patients undergoing LT for HCC. These findings warrant further investigation in a well-designed prospective study.

Abstract

Background/Aims: This study aimed to investigate whether everolimus (EVR) affects long-term survival after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: The data from 303 consecutive patients with HCC who had undergone LT from January 2012 to July 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups: 1) patients treated with EVR in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (EVR group; n=114) and 2) patients treated with CNI-based therapy without EVR (non-EVR group; n=189). Time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS) after propensity score (PS) matching were compared between the groups, and prognostic factors for TTR and OS were evaluated. Results: The EVR group exhibited more aggressive tumor biology than the non-EVR group, such as a higher number of tumors (P=0.003), a higher prevalence of microscopic vascular invasion (P=0.017) and exceeding Milan criteria (P=0.029). Compared with the PS-matched non-EVR group, the PS-matched EVR group had significantly better TTR (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, EVR was identified as an independent prognostic factor for TTR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.248; P=0.001) and OS (HR, 0.145; P<0.001). Conclusions: Combined with CNIs, EVR has the potential to prolong long-term survival in patients undergoing LT for HCC. These findings warrant further investigation in a well-designed prospective study.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Pavel MC, "Expansion of the hepatocellular carcinoma Milan criteria in liver transplantation : future directions", World J Gastroenterol, 24, pp.3626~3636 (2018)
  2. Shimamura T, "Expanded living-donor liver transplantation criteria for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma based on the Japanese nationwide survey : the 5-5-500 rule-a retrospective study", Transpl Int, 32, pp.356~368 (2019)
  3. Chu Kevin Ka-Wan, "Expanding Indications for Liver Transplant: Tumor and Patient Factors", Gut and Liver, 15(1), pp.19~30 (2021), 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회[DOI]
  4. Clavien PA, "Recommendations for liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an international consensus conference report", Lancet Oncol, 13, pp.e11~e22 (2012)
  5. de’Angelis N, "Managements of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation : a systematic review", World J Gastroenterol, 21, pp.11185~11198 (2015)
  6. Schlansky B, "Promise and pitfalls of using α-fetoprotein in liver transplantation allocation for hepatocellular carcinoma", JAMA Surg, 152, pp.64~65 (2017)
  7. Mazzaferro V, "Alpha-fetoprotein in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma : the lower, the better", Hepatology, 68, pp.775~777 (2018)
  8. Tamura S, "Impact of histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma on the outcome of liver transplantation", Arch Surg, 136, pp.25~30 (2001)
  9. Decaens T, "Role of immunosuppression and tumor differentiation in predicting recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma : a multicenter study of 412 patients", World J Gastroenterol, 12, pp.7319~7325 (2006)
  10. Lim KC, "Microvascular invasion is a better predictor of tumor recurrence and overall survival following surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma compared to the Milan criteria", Ann Surg, 254, pp.108~113 (2011)
  11. Kang I, "Subclassification of microscopic vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma", Ann Surg (2020)[DOI]
  12. Vivarelli M, "Analysis of risk factors for tumor recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma : key role of immunosuppression", Liver Transpl, 11, pp.497~503 (2005)
  13. Vivarelli M, "Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma under calcineurin inhibitors : reassessment of risk factors for tumor recurrence", Ann Surg, 248, pp.857~862 (2008)
  14. Grigg SE, "Systematic review with meta-analysis : sirolimus-or everolimus-based immunosuppression following liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma", Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 49, pp.1260~1273 (2019)
  15. Meier-Kriesche HU, "Immunosuppression : evolution in practice and trends, 1994-2004", Am J Transplant, 6(5 Pt 2), pp.1111~1131 (2006)
  16. Hojo M, "Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism", Nature, 397, pp.530~534 (1999)
  17. Vivarelli M, "Effect of different immunosuppressive schedules on recurrence-free survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma", Transplantation, 89, pp.227~231 (2010)
  18. De Simone P, "Everolimus with reduced tacrolimus improves renal function in de novo liver transplant recipients : a randomized controlled trial", Am J Transplant, 12, pp.3008~3020 (2012)
  19. Fischer L, "Three-year outcomes in de novo liver transplant patients receiving everolimus with reduced tacrolimus : follow-up results from a randomized, multicenter study", Transplantation, 99, pp.1455~1462 (2015)
  20. Semela D, "Vascular remodeling and antitumoral effects of mTOR inhibition in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma", J Hepatol, 46, pp.840~848 (2007)
  21. Toso C, "Sirolimusbased immunosuppression is associated with increased survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma", Hepatology, 51, pp.1237~1243 (2010)
  22. Holdaas H, "Everolimus and malignancy after solid organ transplantation : a clinical update", J Transplant, 2016, pp.4369574~ (2016)
  23. Jin YP, "Everolimus inhibits anti-HLA I antibody-mediated endothelial cell signaling, migration and proliferation more potently than sirolimus", Am J Transplant, 14, pp.806~819 (2014)
  24. Klawitter J, "Everolimus and sirolimus in transplantation-related but different", Expert Opin Drug Saf, 14, pp.1055~1070 (2015)
  25. Jeng LB, "Efficacy and safety of everolimus with reduced tacrolimus in living-donor liver transplant recipients : 12-month results of a randomized multicenter study", Am J Transplant, 18, pp.1435~1446 (2018)
  26. De Simone P, "Conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to everolimus therapy in maintenance liver transplant recipients : a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial", Liver Transpl, 15, pp.1262~1269 (2009)
  27. Knight RJ, "Risk factors for impaired wound healing in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients", Clin Transplant, 21, pp.460~465 (2007)
  28. Toso C, "De novo sirolimus-based immunosuppression after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma : long-term outcomes and side effects", Transplantation, 83, pp.1162~1168 (2007)
  29. Montalbano M, "A retrospective review of liver transplant patients treated with sirolimus from a single center : an analysis of sirolimusrelated complications", Transplantation, 78, pp.264~268 (2004)
  30. Pommergaard HC, "Vascular invasion and survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a study from the European Liver Transplant Registry", HPB (Oxford), 20, pp.768~775 (2018)
  31. Geissler EK, "Sirolimus use in liver transplant recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma : a randomized, multicenter, open-label phase 3trial", Transplantation, 100, pp.116~125 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

Impact of immunosuppressant therapy on early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation홍근, 김율희, 김향숙, 김혜령, 서경석, 이광웅, 이남준, 이병구, 이주연, 이혜숙, 최영록대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2014 · 제20권 제2호Efficacy and Safety of a Steroid-Free Immunosuppressive Regimen after Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular CarcinomaChao Wang, Haiyang Xie, Jian Wu, Lin Zhou, Li Zhuang, Min Zhang, Qiang Wei, Runzhou Zhuang, Shusen Zheng, Weilin Wang, Xiao Xu, Yan Shen거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2016 · 제10권 제4호The management of post-transplantation recurrence of hepatocellular carcinomaGonzalo Sapisochin, Hala Muaddi, Luckshi Rajendran, Marco PAW Claasen, Tommy Ivanics대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2022 · 제28권 제1호Criteria and prognostic models for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantationChuan Shen, Jian-jun Zhang, Jie Cao, Jun Wang, Meng Sha, Qiang Xia, Seogsong Jeong, Xiao-ye Qu, Ying Tong, Zhi-feng Xi, Zhi-Hui Zou대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2025 · 제31권 제1호Prediction models of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation: A comprehensive reviewJong Man Kim, Sang Jin Kim대한간학회 · Clinical and Molecular Hepatology2022 · 제28권 제4호Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation: Comparative Analysis with Partial Hepatectomy서경석, 이경분, 이규호, 이남준, 장자준대한병리학회 · Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine2017 · 제51권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)