본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Consequences of Abusive Supervision: Examining the Role of Self-efficacy and Job Autonomy

장용진|권미진|정지윤
한국기업경영학회 (Korean Corporation Management Association)|2024.02|기업경영연구 (Korean Corporation Management Review)|제31권 제1호|pp. 41-64|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.21052/KCMR.2024.31.1.41

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Self-efficacy비인격적 감독자아 효능감Abusive supervision업무 자율성Job autonomyKnowledge hiding behavior지식 은폐 행동
주제분류경영학

초록

Abusive supervision is increasingly recognized as a detrimental factor in contemporary organizations, incurring significant costs. This study sought to unravel the mediating effect of self-efficacy in the association between abusive supervision and knowledge hiding behavior, and to explore how job autonomy moderates this mediated relationship. Utilizing data from 293 Korean full-time employees, the findings indicate that abusive supervision is positively linked to knowledge hiding behavior, with self-efficacy acting as a significant mediator. Furthermore, job autonomy was observed to moderate both the direct relationship between abusive supervision and self-efficacy and the indirect effect of abusive supervision on knowledge hiding behavior through self-efficacy. Specifically, the detrimental impacts of abusive supervision were less pronounced under conditions of high job autonomy. The study’s theoretical and practical implications will be discussed.

Abstract

Abusive supervision is increasingly recognized as a detrimental factor in contemporary organizations, incurring significant costs. This study sought to unravel the mediating effect of self-efficacy in the association between abusive supervision and knowledge hiding behavior, and to explore how job autonomy moderates this mediated relationship. Utilizing data from 293 Korean full-time employees, the findings indicate that abusive supervision is positively linked to knowledge hiding behavior, with self-efficacy acting as a significant mediator. Furthermore, job autonomy was observed to moderate both the direct relationship between abusive supervision and self-efficacy and the indirect effect of abusive supervision on knowledge hiding behavior through self-efficacy. Specifically, the detrimental impacts of abusive supervision were less pronounced under conditions of high job autonomy. The study’s theoretical and practical implications will be discussed.

참고문헌 (64)

  1. Agarwal, U. A., "How and when abusive supervision influences knowledge hiding behavior : evidence from India", Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(1), pp.209~231 (2022)
  2. Al Hawamdeh, N., "Does humble leadership mitigate employees’ knowledge-hiding behaviour? The mediating role of employees’ self-efficacy and trust in their leader", Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(6), pp.1702~1719 (2023)
  3. Ayub, A., "Abusive supervision and knowledge hiding in service organizations : exploring the boundary conditions", International Journal of Conflict Management, 32(5), pp.725~746 (2021)
  4. Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy : toward a unifying theory of behavioral change", Psychological Review, 84(2), pp.191~215 (1977)
  5. Baron, R. M., "The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), pp.1173~1182 (1986)
  6. Brislin, R. W., "Back-translation for cross-cultural research", Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), pp.185~216 (1970)
  7. Carlson, D., "Abusive supervision and work–family conflict : The path through emotional labor and burnout", The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), pp.849~859 (2012)
  8. Carter, W. R., "The effects of employee engagement and self-efficacy on job performance : a longitudinal field study", The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(17), pp.2483~2502 (2018)
  9. Černe, M., "What goes around comes around : Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity", Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), pp.172~192 (2014)
  10. Cho, J., "How and when humble leadership facilitates employee job performance : the roles of feeling trusted and job autonomy", Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(2), pp.169~184 (2021)
  11. Connelly, C. E., "How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3), pp.479~489 (2015)
  12. Connelly, C. E., "Knowledge hiding in organizations", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), pp.64~88 (2012)
  13. Dedahanov, A. T., "When does abusive supervision foster ineffectual and defensive silence? Employee self-efficacy and fear as contingencies", Sustainability, 14(1), pp.231~ (2021)
  14. Demerouti, E., "The job demands-resources model of burnout", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), pp.499~512 (2001)
  15. Dysvik, A., "Perceived job autonomy and turnover intention : The moderating role of perceived supervisor support", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(5), pp.563~573 (2013)
  16. Farooq, R., "Abusive supervision and its relationship with knowledge hiding : the mediating role of distrust", International Journal of Innovation Science, 13(5), pp.709~731 (2021)
  17. Feng, J., "Does abusive supervision always promote employees to hide knowledge? From both reactance and COR perspectives", Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(7), pp.1455~1474 (2019)
  18. Fischer, T., "Abusive supervision : A systematic review and fundamental rethink", The Leadership Quarterly, 32(6), pp.101540~ (2021)
  19. Ghani, U., "Tit for tat : abusive supervision and knowledge hiding-the role of psychological contract breach and psychological ownership", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(4), pp.1240~ (2020)
  20. Guo, L., "The effect of exploitative leadership on knowledge hiding : a conservation of resources perspective", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(1), pp.83~98 (2021)
  21. Hackman, J. R., "Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey", Journal of Applied Psychology, 60(2), pp.159~170 (1975)
  22. Hao, Q., "How to attenuate the effects of abusive supervision on knowledge hiding : The neutralizing roles of coworker support and individual characteristics", Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(7), pp.1807~1825 (2022)
  23. Hobfoll, S. E., "Conservation of resources : A new attempt at conceptualizing stress", American Psychologist, 44(3), pp.513~524 (1989)
  24. Hobfoll, S. E., "The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process : Advancing conservation of resources theory", Applied Psychology, 50(3), pp.337~421 (2001)
  25. Hobfoll, S. E., "Conservation of resources in the organizational context : The reality of resources and their consequences", Annual review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, pp.103~128 (2018)
  26. Islam, T., "Abusive supervision and knowledge hiding : the moderating roles of future orientation and Islamic work ethics", Management Research Review, 44(12), pp.1565~1582 (2021)
  27. Judge, T. A., "Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), pp.80~92 (2001)
  28. Khalid, M., "When and how abusive supervision leads to knowledge hiding behaviors : An Islamic work ethics perspective", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(6), pp.794~806 (2018)
  29. Kim, C. Y., "Effects of Injustice on Innovative Behavior the Mediating Roles of the Social Loafing and Knowledge Hiding Tendency", Korean Corporation Management Review, 27(4), pp.163~182 (2020)
  30. Kong, M., "Implicit followership theory to employee creativity : The roles of leader–member exchange, self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation", Journal of Management & Organization, 25(1), pp.81~95 (2019)
  31. Li, X., "Coping with abusive supervision : the neutralizing effects of perceived organizational support and political skill on employees’ burnout", Current Psychology, 35, pp.77~82 (2016)
  32. Luthans, F., "Employee engagement and manager self-efficacy", Journal of Management Development, 21(5), pp.376~387 (2002)
  33. Mackey, J. D., "The dark side of leadership : A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of destructive leadership research", Journal of Business Research, 132, pp.705~718 (2021)
  34. Mackey, J. D., "Abusive supervision : A meta-analysis and empirical review", Journal of Management, 43(6), pp.1940~1965 (2017)
  35. Martinko, M. J., "A review of abusive supervision research", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), pp.120~137 (2013)
  36. Mhina, K. M., "The Influence of Empowering Leadership on Perceived Organizational Support and Knowledge Sharing : Moderated Mediation Effect of Psychological Contract Violation", Korean Corporation Management Review, 24(1), pp.153~176 (2017)
  37. Ng, K. Y., "Personality and leader effectiveness : a moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy, job demands, and job autonomy", Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), pp.733~743 (2008)
  38. Nguyen, T. M., "Knowledge hiding in organizational crisis : The moderating role of leadership", Journal of Business Research, 139, pp.161~172 (2022)
  39. Peng, Y., "When do work stressors lead to innovative performance? An examination of the moderating effects of learning goal orientation and job autonomy", International Journal of Stress Management, 26(3), pp.250~ (2019)
  40. Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method biases in behavioral research : a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp.879~903 (2003)
  41. Pradhan, S., "Emotional intelligence as a moderator in abusive supervision-intention to quit relationship among Indian healthcare professionals", Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 10(1), pp.35~49 (2018)
  42. Pradhan, S., "Abusive supervision and knowledge hiding : the mediating role of psychological contract violation and supervisor directed aggression", Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(2), pp.216~234 (2020)
  43. Rasheed, M. I., "Abusive supervision and career adaptability : The role of self-efficacy and coworker support", Human Performance, 34(4), pp.239~256 (2021)
  44. Rizwan, M., "The impact of the job stress, job autonomy and working conditions on employee satisfaction", International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 4(2), pp.196~207 (2014)
  45. Restubog, S. L. D., "Yielding to(cyber)-temptation : Exploring the buffering role of self-control in the relationship between organizational justice and cyberloafing behavior in the workplace", Journal of Research in Personality, 45(2), pp.247~251 (2011)
  46. Safdar, M., "Relationship between self-efficacy and knowledge sharing: systematic review", Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(3), pp.254~271 (2021)
  47. Schreurs, B., "Job insecurity and employee health : The buffering potential of job control and job self-efficacy", Work & Stress, 24(1), pp.56~72 (2010)
  48. Tepper, B. J., "Consequences of abusive supervision", Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), pp.178~190 (2000)
  49. Tepper, B. J., "Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), pp.974~983 (2001)
  50. Tepper, B. J., "Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress", Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), pp.1169~1180 (2007)
  51. Thompson, C. A., "Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being", Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(1), pp.100~ (2006)
  52. Schwarzer, R., "Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs", pp.35~37 (1995), NFER-NELSON
  53. Shrout, P. E., "Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies : new procedures and recommendations", Psychological Methods, 7(4), pp.422~445 (2002)
  54. Soral, P., "Knowledge hiding as a coping response to the supervisors’dark triad of personality : a protection motivation theory perspective", Journal of Business Research, 142, pp.1077~1091 (2022)
  55. Spector, P. E., "Perceived control by employees : A meta-analysis of studies concerning autonomy and participation at work", Human Relations, 39(11), pp.1005~1016 (1986)
  56. Sun, N., "A model of abusive supervision, self-efficacy, and work engagement among Chinese registered nurses : The mediating role of self-efficacy", Frontiers in Psychology, 13, pp.962403~ (2022)
  57. Velez, M. J., "Abusive supervision, psychosomatic symptoms, and deviance : Can job autonomy make a difference?", Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(3), pp.322~333 (2016)
  58. Wright, T. A., "Commitment, psychological well-being and job performance : an examination of conservation of resources(COR)theory and job burnout", Journal of Business & Management, 9(4), pp.389~406 (2004)
  59. Wu, T. Y., "Abusive supervision and employee emotional exhaustion : Dispositional antecedents and boundaries", Group & Organization Management, 34(2), pp.143~169 (2009)
  60. Xu, A. J., "Ethical leadership behavior and employee justice perceptions : The mediating role of trust in organization", Journal of Business Ethics, 134, pp.493~504 (2016)
  61. Yang, J., "A multi-level study of servant leadership on creativity : The roles of self-efficacy and power distance", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(5), pp.610~629 (2017)
  62. Yang, S. J., "The Effect of Abusive Supervision on Knowledge Sharing : The Mediating Role of Leader Endorsement and Moderating Effect of Self-Efficacy : Focusing on Psychological Reactance Theory", Korean Corporation Management Review, 30(4), pp.47~70 (2017)
  63. Zhao, H., "Abusive supervision and hospitality employees’ helping behaviors : the joint moderating effects of proactive personality and ability to manage resources", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(4), pp.1977~1994 (2019)
  64. Zhao, H., "Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding in service organizations", International Journal of Hospitality Management, 59, pp.84~94 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

The Moderating Effects of Perceived Supervisor's Power and Negative Affectivity on the Relationship between Abusive Supervision and Employees' Workplace Deviance이경근한국인적자원관리학회 · 인적자원관리연구2011 · 제18권 제4호상사-구성원 자기효능감과 상사의 비인격적인 행동 간의 관계 연구박희태한국인적자원관리학회 · 인적자원관리연구2018 · 제25권 제1호비인격적 감독의 국내 연구 동향과 향후 방향성: 선행요인과 결과변수를 중심으로박지성, 배일한경영경제연구소 · 아태비즈니스연구2021 · 제12권 제3호A Study of the Impact of Abusive Supervision on Employee Productivity : The Mediating Role of Cyberloafing김유경, 방원희, 이초양, 해금개한국전문경영인학회 · 전문경영인연구2022 · 제25권 제1호How Supervisor Incivility Affects Employee Work Effort Through Emotional and Cognitive ProcessesAbdulkhamid Komil ugli Fayzullaev, Alisher Tohirovich Dedahanov, Armigon Ravshanovich Akhmedov, Odiljon Sobirovich Abdurazzakov사람과세계경영학회 · Global Business and Finance Review2025 · 제30권 제3호베트남 근로자가 인식하는 상사의 비인격적 감독과 지식은폐 행동 간의 관계: 정서적 소진의 매개효과와 직장 프렌드십의 조절된 매개효과황득남, 윌리암 다니엘 훈세커한국인력개발학회 · HRD연구2024 · 제26권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

「기업경영연구」학술지 게재논문 분석(2022~2023년)최우재pp. 1-17The Joint Effects of Newcomer Turnover and Replacement on the Relationship between Collective Turnover Rates and Firm Performance김용근, 김영상, 오은지pp. 19-40베트남 편의점의 선택속성이 소비자 만족 및 소비자 충성도에 미치는 영향응웬티퀸, 이성호, 유이매pp. 65-83은행의 금융소비자 보호활동이 경영성과에 미치는 영향백재승, 이문성pp. 85-109경제정책불확실성과 타인자본비용의 관계: 비상장 숙박업체를 대상으로최영목, 최정미pp. 111-132
원문 보기