Prior to Breast MRI Guidelines in Korea, Where Were We?
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate and analyze the adequacy of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)s taken before publication of the 2018 recommendation in South Korea. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 87 cases of breast MRIs, from January 2010 to November 2013, taken at external hospitals in the study. Breast MRI protocol elements are divided into three categories based on the recommendation by the Breast Imaging Study Group of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance: (1) Essential elements for breast MRI protocol; (2) Element to consider when evaluating imaging quality; and (3) Optional element for breast MRI protocol. Also, we divided enrolled cases into three groups based on their conducting locations -- (1) Primary hospitals, (2) Secondary hospitals, and (3) Tertiary hospitals-and analyzed them for the adequacy of imaging protocols based on the 2018 recommendation. We used a Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test to identify differences between categorical variables. Results: Over 98% of the criteria for 'essential elements for breast MRI protocol' were satisfied when compared with the 2018 Recommendation. Over 96% of the criteria for 'elements to consider when evaluating imaging quality' were also satisfied, except for the slice thickness (83.9%). Optional elements for breast MRI protocol were satisfied with various percentages. There were no statistically significant differences between groups of tertiary, secondary, and primary hospitals; however, 3 tesla of MRI (P = 0.04), subtraction image protocol (P = 0.032), and DWI protocol (P = 0.03) were used more frequently in the tertiary hospitals than in the others. Conclusion: We found that the categories of 'essential elements' and 'elements to consider when evaluating imaging quality' were satisfied at 98% and 96%, respectively, when compared with the 2018 Recommendation by the Breast Imaging Study Group of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate and analyze the adequacy of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)s taken before publication of the 2018 recommendation in South Korea. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 87 cases of breast MRIs, from January 2010 to November 2013, taken at external hospitals in the study. Breast MRI protocol elements are divided into three categories based on the recommendation by the Breast Imaging Study Group of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance: (1) Essential elements for breast MRI protocol; (2) Element to consider when evaluating imaging quality; and (3) Optional element for breast MRI protocol. Also, we divided enrolled cases into three groups based on their conducting locations -- (1) Primary hospitals, (2) Secondary hospitals, and (3) Tertiary hospitals-and analyzed them for the adequacy of imaging protocols based on the 2018 recommendation. We used a Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test to identify differences between categorical variables. Results: Over 98% of the criteria for 'essential elements for breast MRI protocol' were satisfied when compared with the 2018 Recommendation. Over 96% of the criteria for 'elements to consider when evaluating imaging quality' were also satisfied, except for the slice thickness (83.9%). Optional elements for breast MRI protocol were satisfied with various percentages. There were no statistically significant differences between groups of tertiary, secondary, and primary hospitals; however, 3 tesla of MRI (P = 0.04), subtraction image protocol (P = 0.032), and DWI protocol (P = 0.03) were used more frequently in the tertiary hospitals than in the others. Conclusion: We found that the categories of 'essential elements' and 'elements to consider when evaluating imaging quality' were satisfied at 98% and 96%, respectively, when compared with the 2018 Recommendation by the Breast Imaging Study Group of the Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance.
참고문헌 (25)
- Lehtimaki T, "Long-term prognosis of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods", Breast Cancer Res, 13, pp.R134~ (2011)
- Kolb TM, "Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them : an analysis of 27, 825 patient evaluations", Radiology, 225, pp.165~175 (2002)
- 오창모, "Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2013", Cancer Research and Treatment, 48(2), pp.436~450 (2016), 대한암학회
- 황지영, "Screening Ultrasound in Women with Negative Mammography: Outcome Analysis", Yonsei Medical Journal, 56(5), pp.1352~1358 (2015), 연세대학교의과대학[DOI]
- 윤인영, "Mammographic Breast Density Evaluation in Korean Women Using Fully Automated Volumetric Assessment", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 31(3), pp.457~462 (2016), 대한의학회
- 김상희, "Computer-Aided Detection with Automated Breast Ultrasonography for Suspicious Lesions Detected on Breast MRI", Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 23(1), pp.46~54 (2019), 대한자기공명의과학회
- Plana MN, "Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer : systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis", Eur Radiol, 22, pp.26~38 (2012)
- Hylton NM, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer : functional tumor volume by MR imaging predicts recurrence-free survival-results from the ACRIN 6657", CALGB 150007 I-SPY 1 TRIAL, 2016, pp.279, 44~55
- "Number of breast MRI examinations 2021"[URL]
- 최선형, "Breast Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) Guideline: Breast Imaging Study Group of Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Recommendations", Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 22(4), pp.205~208 (2018), 대한자기공명의과학회
- 정은하, "Prediction of Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Breast Cancer Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Diffusion- Weighted Imaging", Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 23(2), pp.125~135 (2019), 대한자기공명의과학회
- Cho N, "Breast cancer screening with mammography plus ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging in women 50 years or younger at diagnosis and treated with breast conservation therapy", JAMA Oncol, 3, pp.1495~1502 (2017)
- Marino MA, "Multiparametric MRI of the breast : a review", J Magn Reson Imaging, 47, pp.301~315 (2018)
- Rahbar H, "Multiparametric MR imaging of breast cancer", Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 24, pp.223~238 (2016)
- Sardanelli F, "Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast : recommendations from the EUSOMA working group", Eur J Cancer, 46, pp.1296~1316 (2010)
- Mann RM, "Breast MRI : guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging", Eur Radiol, 18, pp.1307~1318 (2008)
- Konyer NB, "Comparison of MR imaging breast coils", Radiology, 222, pp.830~834 (2002)
- Yeh ED, "Positioning in breast MR imaging to optimize image quality", Radiographics, 34, pp.E1~17 (2014)
- Westra C, "Using T2-weighted sequences to more accurately characterize breast masses seen on MRI", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 202, pp.W183~190 (2014)
- Cheung HS, "Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast", Magn Reson Imaging, 22, pp.1259~1264 (2004)
- Kuhl C., "The current status of breast MR imaging. Part I. Choice of technique, image interpretation, diagnostic accuracy, and transfer to clinical practice", Radiology, 244, pp.356~378 (2007)
- Partridge SC, "Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the breast : protocol optimization, interpretation, and clinical applications", Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, 21, pp.601~624 (2013)
- Partridge SC, "Diffusion-weighted breast MRI : clinical applications and emerging techniques", J Magn Reson Imaging, 45, pp.337~355 (2017)
- 김현성, "유방자기공명영상에서 3 차원 최대 강도 투사 재건 영상의 유용성", Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 13(2), pp.183~189 (2009), 대한자기공명의과학회
- Dontchos BN, "Influence of menstrual cycle timing on screening breast MRI background parenchymal enhancement and diagnostic performance in premenopausal women", J Breast Imaging, 1, pp.205~211 (2019)