Comparison of Standard and Specialized Readings in Routine Practice for the Assessment of Extraprostatic Extension of Prostate Cancer on MRI after Biopsy
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To retrospectively determine whether specialized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reading performed by an experienced radiologist affected the successful assessment of extraprostatic extension (EPE) in the presence of biopsyrelated hemorrhage after prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: Two hundred consecutive patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent MRI. General radiologist and subspecialized radiologist readings were unpaired and reviewed in random order by a radiologist who was blinded to patients’ clinical details and histopathologic data. The extent of hemorrhage was assessed on T1-weighted (T1W) MRI using a 1-4 scale, and the likelihood of EPE was assessed for each of the four categories. Histopathologic specimens served as the reference standard. The area under the curve (AUC) of the standard reading was compared to that of the specialized reading. Results: Post-biopsy hemorrhage was subjectively graded as ≥ 3 in 101 patients (50.5%) by standard reading, and in 100 patients (50.0%) by specialized reading. The standard and specialized readings disagreed for 40 (20.7%) of the patients (kappa [κ] = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.48). Of these, specialized reading was the correct interpretation for 21 patients (52.5%). The sensitivity (75% vs. 44%; P = 0.002) and area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) (0.83 vs. 0.67; P = 0.008) of the specialized readings were significantly higher than those of the standard readings, while there was no significant difference in specificity (84% vs. 87%; P = 0.434). Conclusion: The reinterpretation of MRI by experienced radiologists significantly improves the diagnosis of EPE in prostate cancer in the presence of post-biopsy hemorrhage.
Abstract
Purpose: To retrospectively determine whether specialized magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reading performed by an experienced radiologist affected the successful assessment of extraprostatic extension (EPE) in the presence of biopsyrelated hemorrhage after prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: Two hundred consecutive patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent MRI. General radiologist and subspecialized radiologist readings were unpaired and reviewed in random order by a radiologist who was blinded to patients’ clinical details and histopathologic data. The extent of hemorrhage was assessed on T1-weighted (T1W) MRI using a 1-4 scale, and the likelihood of EPE was assessed for each of the four categories. Histopathologic specimens served as the reference standard. The area under the curve (AUC) of the standard reading was compared to that of the specialized reading. Results: Post-biopsy hemorrhage was subjectively graded as ≥ 3 in 101 patients (50.5%) by standard reading, and in 100 patients (50.0%) by specialized reading. The standard and specialized readings disagreed for 40 (20.7%) of the patients (kappa [κ] = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.48). Of these, specialized reading was the correct interpretation for 21 patients (52.5%). The sensitivity (75% vs. 44%; P = 0.002) and area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) (0.83 vs. 0.67; P = 0.008) of the specialized readings were significantly higher than those of the standard readings, while there was no significant difference in specificity (84% vs. 87%; P = 0.434). Conclusion: The reinterpretation of MRI by experienced radiologists significantly improves the diagnosis of EPE in prostate cancer in the presence of post-biopsy hemorrhage.
참고문헌 (23)
- Sciarra A, "Advances in magnetic resonance imaging : how they are changing the management of prostate cancer", Eur Urol, 59, pp.962~977 (2011)
- Eberhardt SC, "ACR Appropriateness Criteria prostate cancer--pretreatment detection, staging, and surveillance", J Am Coll Radiol, 10, pp.83~92 (2013)
- Tollefson MK, "The impact of clinical stage on prostate cancer survival following radical prostatectomy", J Urol, 189, pp.1707~1712 (2013)
- Boccon-Gibod L, "Management of locally advanced prostate cancer : a European consensus", Int J Clin Pract, 57, pp.187~194 (2003)
- Yamada AH, "Results of radical prostatectomy and adjuvant therapy in the management of locally advanced, clinical stage TC, prostate cancer", Am J Clin Oncol, 17, pp.277~285 (1994)
- Barrett T, "Value of the hemorrhage exclusion sign on T1-weighted prostate MR images for the detection of prostate cancer", Radiology, 263, pp.751~757 (2012)
- Rosenkrantz AB, "Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusionweighted imaging", J Magn Reson Imaging, 31, pp.1387~1394 (2010)
- Futterer JJ, "Prostate cancer : local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging--early experience", Radiology, 238, pp.184~191 (2006)
- Pepe P, "Multiparametric pelvic MRI accuracy in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer in the reevaluation of biopsy microfocal tumor", Anticancer Res, 35, pp.395~399 (2015)
- Dickinson L, "Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting", Eur Urol, 59, pp.477~494 (2011)
- Quon J, "Assessing the utilization of functional imaging in multiparametric prostate MRI in routine clinical practice", Clin Radiol, 70, pp.373~378 (2015)
- Magi-Galluzzi C, "International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 3: extraprostatic extension, lymphovascular invasion and locally advanced disease", Mod Pathol, 24, pp.26~38 (2011)
- Samaratunga H, "International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling", Mod Pathol, 24, pp.6~15 (2011)
- DeLong ER, "Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves : a nonparametric approach", Biometrics, 44, pp.837~845 (1988)
- McClure TD, "Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy", Radiology, 262, pp.874~883 (2012)
- Labanaris AP, "The role of conventional and functional endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the decision of whether to preserve or resect the neurovascular bundles during radical retropubic prostatectomy", Scand J Urol Nephrol, 43, pp.25~31 (2009)
- Akin O, "Interactive dedicated training curriculum improves accuracy in the interpretation of MR imaging of prostate cancer", Eur Radiol, 20, pp.995~1002 (2010)
- Futterer JJ, "Staging prostate cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced endorectal MR imaging prior to radical prostatectomy : experienced versus less experienced readers", Radiology, 237, pp.541~549 (2005)
- Hegde JV, "Preoperative 3-tesla multiparametric endorectal magnetic resonance imaging findings and the odds of upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 85, pp.e101~e107 (2013)
- Billing A, "Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice", World J Urol, 33, pp.923~928 (2015)
- Feng TS, "Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging localizes established extracapsular extension of prostate cancer", Urol Oncol, 33, pp.109 e115~109 e122 (2015)
- Engelbrecht MR, "Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging : a meta-analysis", Eur Radiol, 12, pp.2294~2302 (2002)
- Woo SM, "Jaceosidin induces apoptosis through Bax activation and down-regulation of Mcl-1 and c-FLIP expression in human renal carcinoma Caki cells", Chem Biol Interact, 260, pp.168~175 (2016)