본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Differentiation between Glioblastoma and Solitary Metastasis: Morphologic Assessment by Conventional Brain MR Imaging and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류방사선과학

초록

Purpose: Differentiating between glioblastoma and solitary metastasis is very important for the planning of further workup and treatment. We assessed the ability of various morphological parameters using conventional MRI and diffusion-based techniques to distinguish between glioblastomas and solitary metastases in tumoral and peritumoral regions. Materials and Methods: We included 38 patients with solitary brain tumors (21 glioblastomas, 17 solitary metastases). To find out if there were differences in the morphologic parameters of enhancing tumors, we analyzed their shape, margins, and enhancement patterns on postcontrast T1-weighted images. During analyses of peritumoral regions, we assessed the extent of peritumoral non-enhancing lesion on T2- and postcontrast T1-weighted images. We also aimed to detect peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration by visual assessment of T2-weighted and diffusionbased images, including DWI, ADC maps, and exponential DWI, and evaluated which sequence depicted peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration most clearly. Results: The shapes, margins, and enhancement patterns of tumors all significantly differentiated glioblastomas from metastases. Glioblastomas had an irregular shape, ill-defined margins, and a heterogeneous enhancement pattern; on the other hand, metastases had an ovoid or round shape, well-defined margins, and homogeneous enhancement. Metastases had significantly more extensive peritumoral T2 high signal intensity than glioblastomas had. In visual assessment of peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration using T2-weighted and diffusion-based images, all sequences differed significantly between the two groups. Exponential DWI had the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of both glioblastoma (100%) and metastasis (70.6%). A combination of exponential DWI and ADC maps was optimal for the depiction of peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration in glioblastoma. Conclusion: In the differentiation of glioblastoma from solitary metastatic lesions, visual morphologic assessment of tumoral and peritumoral regions using conventional MRI and diffusion-based techniques can also offer diagnostic information.

Abstract

Purpose: Differentiating between glioblastoma and solitary metastasis is very important for the planning of further workup and treatment. We assessed the ability of various morphological parameters using conventional MRI and diffusion-based techniques to distinguish between glioblastomas and solitary metastases in tumoral and peritumoral regions. Materials and Methods: We included 38 patients with solitary brain tumors (21 glioblastomas, 17 solitary metastases). To find out if there were differences in the morphologic parameters of enhancing tumors, we analyzed their shape, margins, and enhancement patterns on postcontrast T1-weighted images. During analyses of peritumoral regions, we assessed the extent of peritumoral non-enhancing lesion on T2- and postcontrast T1-weighted images. We also aimed to detect peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration by visual assessment of T2-weighted and diffusionbased images, including DWI, ADC maps, and exponential DWI, and evaluated which sequence depicted peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration most clearly. Results: The shapes, margins, and enhancement patterns of tumors all significantly differentiated glioblastomas from metastases. Glioblastomas had an irregular shape, ill-defined margins, and a heterogeneous enhancement pattern; on the other hand, metastases had an ovoid or round shape, well-defined margins, and homogeneous enhancement. Metastases had significantly more extensive peritumoral T2 high signal intensity than glioblastomas had. In visual assessment of peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration using T2-weighted and diffusion-based images, all sequences differed significantly between the two groups. Exponential DWI had the highest sensitivity for the diagnosis of both glioblastoma (100%) and metastasis (70.6%). A combination of exponential DWI and ADC maps was optimal for the depiction of peritumoral neoplastic cell infiltration in glioblastoma. Conclusion: In the differentiation of glioblastoma from solitary metastatic lesions, visual morphologic assessment of tumoral and peritumoral regions using conventional MRI and diffusion-based techniques can also offer diagnostic information.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Louis DN, "The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system", Acta Neuropathol, 114, pp.97~109 (2007)
  2. Lee EJ, "Diagnostic value of peritumoral minimum apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme from solitary metastatic lesions", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 196, pp.71~76 (2011)
  3. Law M, "High-grade gliomas and solitary metastases : differentiation by using perfusion and proton spectroscopic MR imaging", Radiology, 222, pp.715~721 (2002)
  4. Furnari FB, "Malignant astrocytic glioma : genetics, biology, and paths to treatment", Genes Dev, 21, pp.2683~2710 (2007)
  5. Cha S, "Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme and single brain metastasis by peak height and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrastenhanced perfusion MR imaging", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 28, pp.1078~1084 (2007)
  6. Chiang IC, "Distinction between highgrade gliomas and solitary metastases using peritumoral 3-T magnetic resonance spectroscopy, diffusion, and perfusion imagings", Neuroradiology, 46, pp.619~627 (2004)
  7. Opstad KS, "Differentiation of metastases from high-grade gliomas using short echo time 1H spectroscopy", J Magn Reson Imaging, 20, pp.187~192 (2004)
  8. Tang YM, "The solitary enhancing cerebral lesion : can FLAIR aid the differentiation between glioma and metastasis", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 27, pp.609~611 (2006)
  9. Ishimaru H, "Differentiation between high-grade glioma and metastatic brain tumor using single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy", Eur Radiol, 11, pp.1784~1791 (2001)
  10. SungKiCho, "Perfusion MR Imaging: Clinical Utility for the Differential Diagnosis of Various Brain Tumors", Korean Journal of Radiology, 3(3), pp.4~179 (2002), 대한영상의학회
  11. Lee EJ, "Potential role of advanced MRI techniques for the peritumoural region in differentiating glioblastoma multiforme and solitary metastatic lesions", Clin Radiol, 68, pp.e689~697 (2013)
  12. Lu S, "Peritumoral diffusion tensor imaging of high-grade gliomas and metastatic brain tumors", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 24, pp.937~941 (2003)
  13. Kelly PJ, "Imaging-based stereotaxic serial biopsies in untreated intracranial glial neoplasms", J Neurosurg, 66, pp.865~874 (1987)
  14. Strugar J, "Vascular permeability factor in brain metastases : correlation with vasogenic brain edema and tumor angiogenesis", J Neurosurg, 81, pp.560~566 (1994)
  15. Kelly PJ, "Stereotactic histologic correlations of computed tomography-and magnetic resonance imaging-defined abnormalities in patients with glial neoplasms", Mayo Clin Proc, 62, pp.450~459 (1987)
  16. Al-Okaili RN, "Advanced MR imaging techniques in the diagnosis of intraaxial brain tumors in adults", Radiographics 2006; 26Suppl, 1, pp.S173~189
  17. Maurer MH, "Glioblastoma multiforme versus solitary supratentorial brain metastasis : differentiation based on morphology and magnetic resonance signal characteristics", Rofo, 185, pp.235~240 (2013)
  18. 박예원, "Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced T2 FLAIR and 3D T1 Black-Blood Fast Spin-Echo for Detection of Leptomeningeal Metastases", Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 22(2), pp.86~93 (2018), 대한자기공명의과학회[DOI]
  19. Burger PC, "Glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. Pathologic criteria and prognostic implications", Cancer, 56, pp.1106~1111 (1985)
  20. Oh J, "Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficients and T2 relaxation times in characterizing contrast enhancing brain tumors and regions of peritumoral edema", J Magn Reson Imaging, 21, pp.701~708 (2005)
  21. Smirniotopoulos JG, "Patterns of contrast enhancement in the brain and meninges", Radiographics, 27, pp.525~551 (2007)
  22. Kunimatsu A, "Comparison between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma using MR image-based texture analysis", Magn Reson Med Sci, 17, pp.50~57 (2018)
  23. VandenBerg SR, "Current diagnostic concepts of astrocytic tumors", J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 51, pp.644~657 (1992)
  24. Fink KR, "Imaging of brain metastases", Surg Neurol Int, 4, pp.S209~219 (2013)
  25. Takei H, "Brain metastasis : clinical characteristics, pathological findings and molecular subtyping for therapeutic implications", Brain Tumor Pathol, 33, pp.1~12 (2016)
  26. Provenzale JM, "Use of MR exponential diffusion-weighted images to eradicate T2"shine-through"effect", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 172, pp.537~539 (1999)
  27. Engelter ST, "Use of exponential diffusion imaging to determine the age of ischemic infarcts", J Neuroimaging, 11, pp.141~147 (2001)
  28. Penn RD, "Cerebral edema and neurological function : CT, evoked responses, and clinical examination", Adv Neurol, 28, pp.383~394 (1980)
  29. Calli C, "Perfusion and diffusion MR imaging in enhancing malignant cerebral tumors", Eur J Radiol, 58, pp.394~403 (2006)
  30. Sunwoo L, "Differentiation of glioblastoma from brain metastasis : qualitative and quantitative analysis using arterial spin labeling MR imaging", PLoS One, 11, pp.e0166662~ (2016)
  31. Bauer AH, "Differentiation of solitary brain metastasis from glioblastoma multiforme : a predictive multiparametric approach using combined MR diffusion and perfusion", Neuroradiology, 57, pp.697~703 (2015)
  32. Yong Wonn Kwon, "Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) Perfusion MR in the Prediction of Long- Term Survival of Glioblastomas (GBM): Correlation with MGMT Promoter Methylation and 1p", 19q Deletions, 2018, pp.22(3), 158~167[DOI]
  33. Smits M, "Imaging correlates of adult glioma genotypes", Radiology, 284, pp.316~331 (2017)
  34. Yamashita K, "MR imagingbased analysis of glioblastoma multiforme : estimation of IDH1 mutation status", AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 37, pp.58~65 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

Measurement of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values from Diffusion-Weighted MRI: A Comparison of Manual and Semiautomatic Segmentation Methods김성호, 김일한, 김지훈, 김태민, 박성혜, 박철기, 손철호, 윤태진, 이세훈, 최승홍대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2015 · 제19권 제2호Pre-operative Evaluation of Consistency in Intra-axial Brain Tumor with Diffusion-weighted Images (DWI) and Conventional MR Images김범수, 안국진, 오문식, 이윤주, 정소령, 최현석대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2011 · 제15권 제2호Differentitation between Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and Glioblastoma: Added Value of Quantitative Analysis of CT Attenuation and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient노홍기, 문원진, 박소현, 이승철, 이정근, 임유정, 정은철, 최진우대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2012 · 제16권 제3호Differentiation between Glioblastoma and Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging: Comparison Study of the Manual versus Semiautomatic Segmentation Method김예은, 김일한, 박성혜, 박철기, 이순태, 최승홍, Tae Min Kim대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2017 · 제21권 제1호Differentiation of True Recurrence from Delayed Radiation Therapy-related Changes in Primary Brain Tumors Using Diffusion-weighted Imaging, Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Imaging, and Susceptibility-weighted Imaging김동현, 김일한, 김태민, 류인선, 박성혜, 박철기, 손철호, 윤태진, 이세훈, 최승홍대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2014 · 제18권 제2호The Added Value of Double Dose Gadolinium Enhanced 3D T2 Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery for Evaluating Small Brain Metastases안성준, 이승구, 장종희, 정태섭연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2014 · 제55권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)