본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

라쉬분석을 이용한 세 가지 요통 장애 설문지의 비교

A Comparison of Three Low Back Disability Questionnaires With Rasch Analysis

박소연|김경모|이충휘
한국전문물리치료학회 (Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy)|2011.09|한국전문물리치료학회지 (Physical Therapy Korea)|제18권 제3호|pp. 94-102

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류물리치료학

초록

The purpose of this study was to review existing assessment tools for patients with low back pain and improve them through combination. A total of 314 patients with low back pain participated. Their condition was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPD), and the Back Pain Functional Scale (BPFS). Rasch analysis was applied to identify inappropriate items, item difficulties, and the separation index. In this study, the ‘sex life’ item of the ODQ (10 items) and the ‘sleeping’ item of the BPFS (12 items) showed misfit statistics, whereas all items of the QBPD (20 items) were appropriate. After combining the ODQ, QBPD and BPFS, Rasch analysis was applied. The ‘pain intensity’, and the ‘sex life’ item of the ODQ and the ‘throw a ball’ item of QBPD showed misfit statistics. These 3 items were retained for further analysis. The remaining 42 combined ODQ-QBPD-BPFS items were arranged according to difficulty. For all subjects, the most difficult item was ‘pain intensity’, whereas the easiest was ‘take food out of the refrigerator’. As the separation index of 42 combined ODQ-QBPD-BPFS was higher than that of the three questionnaires separately, difficulty of items varied with some need for rearrangement. The results of this study confirmed the possibility and need for a new back pain disability assessment tool, and produced one. Further study is needed to refine the questionnaire in consideration of psychosocial and occupational factors.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review existing assessment tools for patients with low back pain and improve them through combination. A total of 314 patients with low back pain participated. Their condition was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ), the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPD), and the Back Pain Functional Scale (BPFS). Rasch analysis was applied to identify inappropriate items, item difficulties, and the separation index. In this study, the ‘sex life’ item of the ODQ (10 items) and the ‘sleeping’ item of the BPFS (12 items) showed misfit statistics, whereas all items of the QBPD (20 items) were appropriate. After combining the ODQ, QBPD and BPFS, Rasch analysis was applied. The ‘pain intensity’, and the ‘sex life’ item of the ODQ and the ‘throw a ball’ item of QBPD showed misfit statistics. These 3 items were retained for further analysis. The remaining 42 combined ODQ-QBPD-BPFS items were arranged according to difficulty. For all subjects, the most difficult item was ‘pain intensity’, whereas the easiest was ‘take food out of the refrigerator’. As the separation index of 42 combined ODQ-QBPD-BPFS was higher than that of the three questionnaires separately, difficulty of items varied with some need for rearrangement. The results of this study confirmed the possibility and need for a new back pain disability assessment tool, and produced one. Further study is needed to refine the questionnaire in consideration of psychosocial and occupational factors.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. 김경모, "요통환자의 일반적 특성에 따른 한국어판 오스웨스트리 장애 설문지의 라쉬분석", 한국전문물리치료학회지, 18(2), pp.35~42 (2011), 한국전문물리치료학회
  2. 박소연, "노인의 낙상에 영향을 주는 요인을 평가하기 위한 ABC-BBS의 적용: 사전연구", 한국전문물리치료학회지, 15(2), pp.44~53 (2008), 한국전문물리치료학회
  3. 박소연, "수정된 오스웨스트리 허리기능 장애 설문지의 라쉬분석: 산업장에서의 업무관련 요통환자를 대상으로", 한국전문물리치료학회지, 15(3), pp.26~34 (2008), 한국전문물리치료학회
  4. 성태제, "현대교육평가 3판" (2010), 학지사
  5. 이충휘, "물리치료사와 작업치료사를 위한 연구방법론 3판" (2007), 계축문화사
  6. 전창훈, "한국어판 Oswestry Disability Index(장애지수)의 문화적 개작", 대한척추외과학회지, 12(2), pp.146~152 (2005)
  7. 지은림, "라쉬모형의 이론과 실제" (2000), 교육과학사
  8. Beattie P, "The role of functional status questionnaires for low back pain", Aust J Physiother, 43(1), pp.29~38 (1997)
  9. Bombardier C, "Outcome assessments in the evaluation of treatment of spinal disorders: Summary and general recommendations", Spine, 25(24), pp.3100~3103 (2000)
  10. Boos N, "Volvo award in clinical science. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, work perception and psychosocial factors in identifying symptomatic disk herniations", Spine, 20(24), pp.2613~2625 (1995)
  11. Chou R, "Imaging strategies for low-back pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis", Lancet, 373(9662), pp.463~472 (2009)
  12. Dagenais S, "Synthesis of recommendations for the assessment and management of low back pain from recent clinical practice guidelines", Spine J, 10(6), pp.514~529 (2010)
  13. Dallmeijer AJ, "Differential item functioning of the functional independence measure in higher performing neurological patients", J Rehabil Med, 37(6), pp.346~352 (2005)
  14. Davidson M, "Rasch analysis of three versions of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire", Man Ther, 13(3), pp.222~231 (2008)
  15. Davidson M, "A comparison of five low back disability questionnaires: Reliability and responsiveness", Phys Ther, 82(1), pp.8~24 (2002)
  16. Delitto A, "Are measures of function and disability important in low back care", Phys Ther, 74(5), pp.452~462 (1994)
  17. Fairbank JC, "The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire", Physiotherapy, 66(8), pp.271~273 (1980)
  18. Grotle M, "Functional status and disability questionnaire: What do they assess? A systematic review of back-specific outcome questionnaires", Spine, 30(1), pp.130~140 (2005)
  19. Haywood KL, "Patient reported outcome I: Measuring what matters in musculoskeletal care", Musculoskeletal Care, 4(4), pp.187~203 (2006)
  20. Holm I, "Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires", Spine, 28(8), pp.828~833 (2003)
  21. Kopec JA, "The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Measurement properties", Spine, 20(3), pp.341~352 (1995)
  22. Lewis JS, "A randomized control trial comparing two physiotherapy intervention for chronic low back pain", Spine, 30(7), pp.711~721 (2005)
  23. Modic MT, "Acute low back pain and radiculopathy: MR imaging findings and their prognostic role and effect on outcome", Radiology, 237(2), pp.597~604 (2005)
  24. Rocchi MB, "Critical comparison of nine different self-administered questionnaires for the evaluation of disability caused by low back pain", Eura Medicophys, 41(4), pp.275~281 (2005)
  25. Roland M, "A study of the natural history of back pain, Part I: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain", Spine, 8(2), pp.141~144 (1983)
  26. Stratford PW, "Development and initial validation of the Back Pain Functional Scale", Spine, 25(16), pp.2095~2102 (2000)
  27. Waddell G, "The Back Pain Revolution" (1998), Churchill Livingstone
  28. Waddell G, "Assessment of severity in low-back disorders", Spine, 9(2), pp.204~208 (1984)

관련 논문AI추천

요통환자의 일반적 특성에 따른 한국어판 오스웨스트리 장애 설문지의 라쉬분석김경모, 박소연, 이충휘한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2011 · 제18권 제2호수정된 오스웨스트리 허리기능 장애 설문지의 라쉬분석: 산업장에서의 업무관련 요통환자를 대상으로박소연, 오재섭, 이충휘한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2008 · 제15권 제3호Differential Item Functioning of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire Between Participants With and Without Low Back Pain최봉삼한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2014 · 제21권 제4호Selecting Common Items for Linking the Oswestry Low Back Pain Questionnaire and a Short Form of Self-Reported Activity Measure for Low Back Painchoi bongsam한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2015 · 제22권 제3호A Comparative Study of Oswestry Back Pain Disability Questionnaire Versus Computer Adaptive Testing for Measuring Back Painchoi bongsam한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2013 · 제20권 제4호The Use of Rasch Model in Developing a Short Form Based on Self-Reported Activity Measure for Low Back Painchoi bongsam한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2014 · 제21권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

엎드려 누운 자세에서 엉덩관절 폄시 내적, 외적 안정화 방법이 큰 볼기근의 선택적 근활성에 미치는 영향이동규, 윤지연, 오재섭, 김태호, 문세나, 노경희pp. 1-7만성 뇌졸중 환자에서 편안한 호흡 시 건측과 마비측으로 복근 두께 비교이충휘, 신헌석, 이영정, 이규완pp. 8-15독립보행이 가능한 강직성 뇌성마비 아동들의 수직 및 수평 장애물 통과에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석이수진, 오덕원pp. 16-25일어서기 동작 시 시상면 골반 기울임이 엉덩관절과 무릎관절의 운동형상학에 미치는 영향최보람, 김현숙, 임인혁pp. 26-37국내 노인을 대상으로 한 낙상예방 운동프로그램이 근력증가에 미치는 효과: 메타분석신인수, 박소연pp. 38-48
원문 보기