본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of the Thickness of the Neck Flexor Muscles of Subjects With and Without a Forward Head Posture on the Two Initial Head Positions During Cranio-Cervical Flexion Exercise

1

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류물리치료학

초록

This study compared the effects of the initial head position (i.e., a HHP versus a relaxed head position) of subjects with and without a FHP on the thickness of the deep and superficial neck flexor muscles during CCF. The study recruited 6 subjects with a FHP and 10 subjects without a FHP. The subjects performed CCF in two different head positions: a HHP, with the head aligned so that the forehead and chin formed a horizontal line, and a relaxed head position (RHP), with the head aligned in a self-selected comfortable position. During the CCF exercise, the thickness of the longus colli (LCo) and the thickness of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) were recorded using ultrasonography. The thickness of each muscle was measured by Image J software. The statistical analysis was performed with a two-way mixed-model analysis of variance. The thickness of the SCM differed significantly (p<.05) between the subjects with and without FHP. According to a post hoc independent t-test, the change in thickness of the SCM increased significantly during CCF in the subjects with FHP while adopting a HHP compared to that in the subjects without FHP. The change in thickness of the SCM was not significantly different between the two positions in subjects without FHP, and there was no significant change in thickness of the LCo muscle during the CCF exercise according to the initial position in both subjects with and without FHP. The results suggest that CCF should be performed in RHP to minimize contraction of the SCM in subjects with a FHP.

Abstract

This study compared the effects of the initial head position (i.e., a HHP versus a relaxed head position) of subjects with and without a FHP on the thickness of the deep and superficial neck flexor muscles during CCF. The study recruited 6 subjects with a FHP and 10 subjects without a FHP. The subjects performed CCF in two different head positions: a HHP, with the head aligned so that the forehead and chin formed a horizontal line, and a relaxed head position (RHP), with the head aligned in a self-selected comfortable position. During the CCF exercise, the thickness of the longus colli (LCo) and the thickness of the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) were recorded using ultrasonography. The thickness of each muscle was measured by Image J software. The statistical analysis was performed with a two-way mixed-model analysis of variance. The thickness of the SCM differed significantly (p<.05) between the subjects with and without FHP. According to a post hoc independent t-test, the change in thickness of the SCM increased significantly during CCF in the subjects with FHP while adopting a HHP compared to that in the subjects without FHP. The change in thickness of the SCM was not significantly different between the two positions in subjects without FHP, and there was no significant change in thickness of the LCo muscle during the CCF exercise according to the initial position in both subjects with and without FHP. The results suggest that CCF should be performed in RHP to minimize contraction of the SCM in subjects with a FHP.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Cheung Lau HW, "Clinical measurement of craniovertebral angle by electronic head posture instrument: A test of reliability and validity", Man Ther, 14(4), pp.363~368 (2009)
  2. Falla DL, "Relationship between cranio-cervical flexion range of motion and pressure change during the cranio-cervical flexion test", Man Ther, 8(2), pp.92~96 (2003)
  3. Falla DL, "Patients with neck pain demonstrate reduced electromyographic activity of the deep cervical flexor muscles during performance of the craniocervical flexion test", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 29(19), pp.2108~2114 (2004)
  4. Gong W, "Correlations between cervical lordosis, forward head posture, cervical ROM and the strength and endurance of the deep neck flexor muscles in college students", J Phys Ther Sci, 24(3), pp.275~277 (2012)
  5. Griegel-Morris P, "Incidence of common postural abnormalities in the cervical, shoulder, and thoracic regions and their association with pain in two age groups of healthy subjects", Phys Ther, 72(6), pp.425~431 (1992)
  6. Ishida H, "Correlation between neck slope angle and deep cervical flexor muscle thickness in healthy participants", J Bodyw Mov Ther (2015)
  7. Jesus FM, "Ultrasonographic measurement of neck muscle recruitment: A preliminary investigation", J Man Manip Ther, 16(2), pp.89~92 (2008)
  8. Jesus-Moraleida FR, "Ultrasonographic analysis of the neck flexor muscles in patients with chronic neck pain and changes after cervical spine mobilization", J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 34(8), pp.514~524 (2011)[DOI]
  9. Johnson GM, "The correlation between surface measurement of head and neck posture and the anatomic position of the upper cervical vertebrae", Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 23(8), pp.921~927 (1998)
  10. Jull G, "Grieve’s Modern Manual Therapy: The vertebral column" (2004), Churchill Livingstone
  11. Jull G, "Impairment in the cervical flexors: A comparison of whiplash and insidious onset neck pain patients", Man Ther, 9(2), pp.89~94 (2004)
  12. Jull GA, "Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles : The craniocervical flexion test", J Manipulative Physio Ther, 31(7), pp.525~533 (2008)
  13. Kendall FP, "Muscles: Testing and function with posture and pain", pp.52~159 (2005), Williams & Wilkins
  14. 권오윤, "Effect of Deep Neck Flexor Performance on the Stability of the Cervical Spine in Subject With and Without Neck Pain", 한국전문물리치료학회지, 18(4), pp.1~9 (2011), 한국전문물리치료학회
  15. Lluch E, "Effects of deep cervical flexor training on pressure pain thresholds over myofascial trigger points in patients with chronic neck pain", J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 36(9), pp.604~611 (2013)[DOI]
  16. Mayoux-Benhamou MA, "Selective electromyography of dorsal neck muscles in humans", Exp Brain Res, 113(2), pp.353~360 (1997)
  17. Neumann DA, "Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for rehabilitation", pp.398~404 (2010), Mosby
  18. Page P, "Assessment and treatment of muscle imbalance: The janda approach", pp.178~180 (2010), Human Kinetics
  19. Sahrmann S, "Movement System Impairment Syndromes of the Extremities, Cervical and Thoracic Spines", pp.51~86 (2010), Mosby
  20. Uthaikhup S, "Performance in the cranio-cervical flexion test is altered in elderly subjects", Man Ther, 14(5), pp.475~479 (2009)[DOI]
  21. Yip CH, "The relationship between head posture and severity and disability of patients with neck pain", Man Ther, 13(2), pp.148~154 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

Comparison of Muscle Thickness and Changing Ratio for Cervical Flexor Muscles During the Craniocervical Flexion Test Between Subjects With and Without Forward Head Posture권오윤, 황의재, Lee Jae-hyun한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2022 · 제29권 제3호Comparison of the Cross-Sectional Area of Longus Colli and MuscleActivity of Sternocleidomastoid in Subjects With Forward HeadPosture on the Two Craniocervical Flexion Methods권오윤, 김현아, 손민찬, 안선희, 정성훈, 황의재한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2018 · 제25권 제2호앞쪽머리자세를 가진 대상자의 머리-목 굽힘 검사 시 머리받침 유무에 따른 긴목근과 목빗근의 근두께 변화량 비교권오윤, 박준상, 송시정, 정희석한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2016 · 제23권 제3호Comparative Immediate Effects of Isometric Chin-tuck and Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization on Neck Flexor Muscle Thickness and Upright Sitting Height Posture김하연, 박지호, 신지원, 유승현, 윤현식한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2019 · 제26권 제4호Comparison of Upper and Lower Cervical Muscle Strengths Between Subjects With and Without Forward Head Posture권오윤, 안선희, 정성훈, 황의재, Ji-yeon Eun한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2020 · 제27권 제4호Comparing the Effects of Manual and Self-exercise Therapy for Improving Forward Head Posture심경섭, 전혜선, Donghoon Kim한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2023 · 제30권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)