Construct Validity of a Korean Version of the WHOQOL-BREF and EQ-5D Questionnaire Applied on Various Cancer Survivors Undergoing Palliative Rehabilitation Programs
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Although the original version of the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires are found to be acceptable, the cross-culturally adapted versions may not be comparable to their original version. Objects: To examine dimensionality and construct validity of two Korean versions of the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) and EuroQOL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Methods: A total of 77 cancer survivors undergoing palliative rehabilitation programs from two rehabilitation institutes was recruited from April 16, 2018 to June 26, 2019. The WHOQOL- BREF and the EQ-5D were filled out by the various cancer survivors following a particular session of rehabilitation programs. The scores were analyzed with Winsteps Rasch analysis computer program using the rating scale model. Rasch fit statistics were used to determine the dimensionality and the item difficulty calibrations of WHOQOL-BREF and EQ-5D. Results: All items except two, negative feeling, need treatment function and pain prevent activity (mean square [MnSq] = 2.42, 1.82 and 2.51, respectively), were found to be acceptable, while two items of the EQ-5D, anxiety/depression and self-care, were misfit (infit MnSq = 1.65 and 0.38, respectively). Item difficulty calibrations of WHOQOL-BREF match person ability measures (i.e., HRQOL) fairly well. However, the person ability distribution showed obvious ceiling effects for EQ-5D. All items of EQ-5D were appeared to be less challenged in comparison with those of WHOQOL-BREF. Conclusion: Item-level analysis using the Rasch model supports the quality of culturally adapted items used to measure the HRQOL one exception; that is, whether or not to include misfit items as part of the HRQOL measurements. Additionally, cancer survivors undergoing palliative rehabilitation programs appear to have more of a tendency to view the EQ-5D items as being more challenging than the WHOQOL-BREF.
Abstract
Background: Although the original version of the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires are found to be acceptable, the cross-culturally adapted versions may not be comparable to their original version. Objects: To examine dimensionality and construct validity of two Korean versions of the brief version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) and EuroQOL-5 dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Methods: A total of 77 cancer survivors undergoing palliative rehabilitation programs from two rehabilitation institutes was recruited from April 16, 2018 to June 26, 2019. The WHOQOL- BREF and the EQ-5D were filled out by the various cancer survivors following a particular session of rehabilitation programs. The scores were analyzed with Winsteps Rasch analysis computer program using the rating scale model. Rasch fit statistics were used to determine the dimensionality and the item difficulty calibrations of WHOQOL-BREF and EQ-5D. Results: All items except two, negative feeling, need treatment function and pain prevent activity (mean square [MnSq] = 2.42, 1.82 and 2.51, respectively), were found to be acceptable, while two items of the EQ-5D, anxiety/depression and self-care, were misfit (infit MnSq = 1.65 and 0.38, respectively). Item difficulty calibrations of WHOQOL-BREF match person ability measures (i.e., HRQOL) fairly well. However, the person ability distribution showed obvious ceiling effects for EQ-5D. All items of EQ-5D were appeared to be less challenged in comparison with those of WHOQOL-BREF. Conclusion: Item-level analysis using the Rasch model supports the quality of culturally adapted items used to measure the HRQOL one exception; that is, whether or not to include misfit items as part of the HRQOL measurements. Additionally, cancer survivors undergoing palliative rehabilitation programs appear to have more of a tendency to view the EQ-5D items as being more challenging than the WHOQOL-BREF.
참고문헌 (28)
- "Cancer" (2018)[URL]
- Kang DW, "Associations between physical activity and comorbidities in Korean cancer survivors", J Cancer Surviv, 12(4), pp.441~449 (2018)
- Oliveira IS, "Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires : a systematic review", Qual Life Res, 24(5), pp.1179~1195 (2015)
- Caplan N, "Changes in health-related quality of life(EQ-5D)dimensions associated with community-based musculoskeletal physiotherapy : a multi-centre analysis", Qual Life Res, 27(9), pp.2373~2382 (2018)
- Efthymiadou O, "Differentiation of health-related quality of life outcomes between five disease areas : results from an international survey of patients", Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 34(5), pp.498~506 (2018)
- Perera HN, "Resolving dimensionality problems with WHOQOL-BREF item responses", Assessment, 25(8), pp.1014~1025 (2018)
- Skevington SM, "The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group", Qual Life Res, 13(2), pp.299~310 (2004)
- Kaasa S, "Quality of life in palliative care : principles and practice", Palliat Med, 17(1), pp.11~20 (2003)
- Desai MJ, "Optimizing quality of life through palliative care", J Am Osteopath Assoc, 107(12Suppl 7), pp.ES9~ES14 (2007)
- Avoine-Blondin J, "Identifying domains of quality of life in children with cancer undergoing palliative care : a qualitative study with professionals", Palliat Support Care, 15(5), pp.565~574 (2017)
- Khan I, "Comparing the mapping between EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-3L and the EORTC-QLQ-C30 in non-small cell lung cancer patients", Health Qual Life Outcomes, 14, pp.60~ (2016)
- Payakachat N, "Can the EQ-5D detect meaningful change? A systematic review", Pharmacoeconomics, 33(11), pp.1137~1154 (2015)
- Skevington SM, "Developing methods for assessing quality of life in different cultural settings. The history of the WHOQOL instruments", Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 39(1), pp.1~8 (2004)
- Guillemin F, "Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures : literature review and proposed guidelines", J Clin Epidemiol, 46(12), pp.1417~1432 (1993)
- Schmidt S, "Current issues in cross-cultural quality of life instrument development", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84(4 Suppl 2), pp.S29~S34 (2003)
- Escobar A, "Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) questionnaire: application in a sample of short-term survivors", Health Qual Life Outcomes, 13, pp.182~ (2015)
- Jette AM, "Comparison of functional status tools used in post-acute care", Health Care Financ Rev, 24(3), pp.13~24 (2003)
- McHorney CA, "Health status assessment methods for adults : past accomplishments and future challenges", Annu Rev Public Health, 20, pp.309~335 (1999)
- Liang MH, "Measuring clinically important changes with patient-oriented questionnaires", Med Care, 40(4 Suppl), pp.II45~II51 (2002)
- Speyer R, "Measurement properties of self-report questionnaires on health-related quality of life and functional health status in dysphonia : a systematic review using the COSMIN taxonomy", Qual Life Res, 28(2), pp.283~296 (2019)
- Kim SH, "Comparing the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L in cancer patients in Korea", Qual Life Res, 21(6), pp.1065~1073 (2012)
- Min SK, "Development of the Korean versions of WHO Quality of Life scale and WHOQOL-BREF", Qual Life Res, 11(6), pp.593~600 (2002)
- Bond TG, "Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences", pp.23~28 (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Young TA, "Developing preference-based health measures : using Rasch analysis to generate health state values", Qual Life Res, 19(6), pp.907~917 (2010)
- Ledesma RD, "The Scree test and the number of factors : a dynamic graphics approach", Span J Psychol, 18, pp.E11~ (2015)
- World Health Organization, "Programme on mental health:WHOQOL user manual", World Health Organization, 48~49 (1998)
- Westen D, "Quantifying construct validity : two simple measures", J Pers Soc Psychol, 84(3), pp.608~618 (2003)
- Danielsen AK, "Translation of questionnaires measuring health related quality of life is not standardized : a literature based research study", PLoS One, 10(5), pp.e0127050~ (2015)