Effects of Different Knee Flexion Angles According to Three Positions on Abdominal and Pelvic Muscle Activity During Supine Bridging
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes how different knee flexion angles affect the abdominal and pelvic muscle activity during supine bridging. Twenty healthy subjects participated in the study. We used surface electromyography (EMG) to measure how three different knee flexion angles (100°, 70°, and 40°) affected the activity of the transverse abdominis/internal oblique (TrA/IO), external oblique (EO), biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), and gluteus maximus (GM) muscles on the dominant side during supine bridging. The one-way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the statistical significance of TrA/IO, EO, BF, RF and GM muscle activity and the GM/BF activity ratio. For the TrA/IO, EO, BF, and GM muscles, supine bridging with different knee flexion angles resulted in significant differences in abdominal and pelvic muscle activity. For the TrA/IO muscles, the post-hoc test demonstrated that muscle activity significantly increased at 40° compared to 70°; however, there were no significant differences between 100° and 70° or 100° and 40°. For the EO muscle, the post-hoc test demonstrated that muscle activity significantly increased at 40° compared to 100° and 70°; no significant difference was observed between angles 100° and 70°. For the BF muscle, the post-hoc test demonstrated that muscle activity significantly increased according to the knee flexion angle (40°>70°>100°). For the GM muscle, the post-hoc test demonstrated that muscle activity significantly increased according to the knee flexion angle (100°>70°>40°). However, for the RF muscle, there was no significant difference. Additionally, the GM/BF activity ratio significantly increased according to the knee flexion angle (100°>70°>40°). From these results, we can conclude that bridging with a knee flexion of 100° can strengthen the GM muscle, whereas bridging with a knee flexion of 40° is recommended to strengthen the IO, EO, and BF muscles. We can also conclude that knee flexion angles should be modified during supine bridging to increase the muscle activity of different target muscles.
Abstract
This study analyzes how different knee flexion angles affect the abdominal and pelvic muscle activity during supine bridging. Twenty healthy subjects participated in the study. We used surface electromyography (EMG) to measure how three different knee flexion angles (100°, 70°, and 40°) affected the activity of the transverse abdominis/internal oblique (TrA/IO), external oblique (EO), biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), and gluteus maximus (GM) muscles on the dominant side during supine bridging. The one-way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the statistical significance of TrA/IO, EO, BF, RF and GM muscle activity and the GM/BF activity ratio. For the TrA/IO, EO, BF, and GM muscles, supine bridging with different knee flexion angles resulted in significant differences in abdominal and pelvic muscle activity. For the TrA/IO muscles, the post-hoc test demonstrated that muscle activity significantly increased at 40° compared to 70°; however, there were no significant differences between 100° and 70° or 100° and 40°. For the EO muscle, the post-hoc test demonstrated that muscle activity significantly increased at 40° compared to 100° and 70°; no significant difference was observed between angles 100° and 70°. For the BF muscle, the post-hoc test demonstrated that muscle activity significantly increased according to the knee flexion angle (40°>70°>100°). For the GM muscle, the post-hoc test demonstrated that muscle activity significantly increased according to the knee flexion angle (100°>70°>40°). However, for the RF muscle, there was no significant difference. Additionally, the GM/BF activity ratio significantly increased according to the knee flexion angle (100°>70°>40°). From these results, we can conclude that bridging with a knee flexion of 100° can strengthen the GM muscle, whereas bridging with a knee flexion of 40° is recommended to strengthen the IO, EO, and BF muscles. We can also conclude that knee flexion angles should be modified during supine bridging to increase the muscle activity of different target muscles.
참고문헌 (22)
- Andersen LL, "Neuromuscular activation in conventional therapeutic exercises and heavy resistance exercises: Implications for rehabilitation", Phys Ther, 86(5), pp.683~697 (2006)
- Bergmark A, "Stability of the lumbar spine. A study in mechanical engineering", Acta Orthop Scand Suppl, 230, pp.1~54 (1989)
- Bjerkefors A, "Deep and superficial abdominal muscle activation during trunk stabilization exercises with and without instruction to hollow", Man Ther, 15(5), pp.502~507 (2010)
- Criswell E., "Cram’s Introduction to Surface Electromyography", pp.353~369 (2011), Jones and Bartlett Publishers
- Crone C, "Reciprocal inhibition in man", Dan Med Bull, 40(5), pp.571~581 (1993)
- Ekstrom RA, "Electromyographic analysis of core trunk, hip, and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 37(12), pp.754~762 (2007)
- Escamilla RF, "An electromyographic analysis of commercial andcommon abdominal exercises: Implications for rehabilitation and training", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 36(2), pp.45~57 (2006)
- Faul F, "G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences", Behav Res Methods, 39(2), pp.175~191 (2007)
- García-Vaquero MP, "Trunk muscle activation during stabilization exercises with single and double leg support", J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 22(3), pp.398~406 (2012)
- Imai A, "Trunk muscle activity during lumbar stabilization exercises on both a stable and unstable surface", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 40(6), pp.369~375 (2010)
- Kavcic N, "Quantifying tissue loads and spine stability while performing commonly prescribed low back stabilization exercises", Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 29(20), pp.2319~2329 (2004)
- Kendall FP, "Muscles: Testing and function with posture and pain", pp.186~429 (2005), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
- Kim SJ, "Comparison of abdominal muscle activity during a single-legged hold in the hook-lying position on the floor and on a round foam roll", J Athl Train, 46(4), pp.403~408 (2011)
- Kozol MZ, "Bridging performance of adults with hemiparesis: Sliding of the paretic limb", J Geriatr Phys Ther, 33(1), pp.26~33 (2010)
- Lehman GJ, "Trunk muscle activity during bridging exercises on and off a swiss ball", Chiropr Osteopat, 13, pp.14~ (2005)
- Marshall PW, "Core stability exercises on and off a swiss ball", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 86(2), pp.242~249 (2005)
- McGill SM, "Exercises for spine stabilization: Motion", motor patterns, stability progressions, and clinical technique, 2009, pp.90(1), 118~126
- Myklebust G, "Rehabilitation of knee injuries, In Clinical Guide to Sports Injuries", pp.353~359 (2004), Human Kinetics
- Santos MJ, "Effects of lateral perturbations and changing stance conditions on anticipatory postural adjustment", J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 19(3), pp.532~541 (2009)
- Stevens VK, "Trunk muscle activity in healthy subjects during bridging stabilization exercises", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 7, pp.75~ (2006)
- Stevens VK, "The influence of specific training on trunk muscle recruitment patterns in healthy subjects during stabilization exercises", Man Ther, 12(3), pp.271~279 (2007)
- Youdas JW, "An electromyographic analysis of the ab-slide exercise, abdominal crunch, supine double leg thrust, and side bridge in healthy young adults: Implications for rehabilitation professionals", J Strength Cond Res, 22(6), pp.1939~1946 (2008)