본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기능적 발목 불안정성을 가진 대상자에게 동적 자세 안정성 훈련과 연성 발목 보조기가 다중 한발 뛰기 수행에 미치는 효과 비교

Comparison of the Effects of Dynamic Postural Stability Training Versus Soft Ankle Bracing on Multiple Hop Performance in Participants With Functional Ankle Instability

박규남|차윤상
한국전문물리치료학회 (Korean Research Society of Physical Therapy)|2017.02|한국전문물리치료학회지 (Physical Therapy Korea)|제24권 제1호|pp. 1-8|DOI https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2017.24.1.001

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

InstabilityHop testAnkle braceDynamic postural stability
주제분류물리치료학

초록

Background: The multiple hop test is an active performance test that has been commonly used to assess individuals with functional ankle instability. Previous studies have suggested that insufficiency of dynamic postural stability and passive stability during dynamic activities can have an influence on performance in the multiple hop test. However, no study has investigated the effects of dynamic postural stability training and ankle bracing on multiple hop test performance in individuals with functional ankle instability. Objects: The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effects of dynamic postural stability training versus ankle bracing in the performance of the multiple hop test for participants with functional ankle instability. Methods: Twenty-nine participants with functional ankle instability who scored below 24 in the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool were selected. The participants were randomly divided into two groups: a dynamic postural stability training group (n1=14) and an ankle bracing control group (n2=15). The multiple hop tests were performed before and after applying each intervention. Dynamic postural stability training was performed using visual-feedback-based balance-training equipment; participants in this group were asked to perform a heel raise in a standing position while watching the centering of their forefoot pressure to prevent excessive ankle inversion. Ankle bracing was applied in the control group. Results: When comparing the pre- and post-intervention period for both groups, both methods significantly improved the results of the multiple hop test (p<.05). However, no significant differences were shown between the dynamic postural stability training and ankle bracing groups (p>.05). Conclusion: Both dynamic postural stability training and ankle bracing showed significant improvement (2.85 seconds and 2.05 seconds, respectively) in test performance. Further study is needed to determine the long-term effects of dynamic postural stability training and to determine whether insufficient dynamic postural stability is a causative factor for functional ankle instability.

Abstract

Background: The multiple hop test is an active performance test that has been commonly used to assess individuals with functional ankle instability. Previous studies have suggested that insufficiency of dynamic postural stability and passive stability during dynamic activities can have an influence on performance in the multiple hop test. However, no study has investigated the effects of dynamic postural stability training and ankle bracing on multiple hop test performance in individuals with functional ankle instability. Objects: The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effects of dynamic postural stability training versus ankle bracing in the performance of the multiple hop test for participants with functional ankle instability. Methods: Twenty-nine participants with functional ankle instability who scored below 24 in the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool were selected. The participants were randomly divided into two groups: a dynamic postural stability training group (n1=14) and an ankle bracing control group (n2=15). The multiple hop tests were performed before and after applying each intervention. Dynamic postural stability training was performed using visual-feedback-based balance-training equipment; participants in this group were asked to perform a heel raise in a standing position while watching the centering of their forefoot pressure to prevent excessive ankle inversion. Ankle bracing was applied in the control group. Results: When comparing the pre- and post-intervention period for both groups, both methods significantly improved the results of the multiple hop test (p<.05). However, no significant differences were shown between the dynamic postural stability training and ankle bracing groups (p>.05). Conclusion: Both dynamic postural stability training and ankle bracing showed significant improvement (2.85 seconds and 2.05 seconds, respectively) in test performance. Further study is needed to determine the long-term effects of dynamic postural stability training and to determine whether insufficient dynamic postural stability is a causative factor for functional ankle instability.

참고문헌 (23)

  1. DiStefano LJ, "Lower extremity kinematics and ground reaction forces after prophylactic lace-up ankle bracing", J Athl Train, 43(3), pp.234~241 (2008)
  2. Docherty CL, "Functional-Performance deficits in volunteers with functional ankle instability", J Athl Train, 40(1), pp.30~34 (2005)
  3. Docherty CL, "Effects of strength training on strength development and joint position sense in functionally unstable ankles", J Athl Train, 33(4), pp.310~314 (1998)
  4. Doherty C, "The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury : A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies", Sports Med, 44(1), pp.123~140 (2014)
  5. Donovan L, "Rehabilitation for Chronic Ankle Instability With or Without Destabilization Devices : A Randomized Controlled Trial", J Athl Train, 51(3), pp.233~251 (2016)
  6. Eechaute C, "Functional performance deficits in patients with CAI : Validity of the multiple hop test", Clin J Sport Med, 18(2), pp.124~129 (2008)
  7. Fitzgerald D, "Effects of a wobble board-based therapeutic exergaming system for balance training on dynamic postural stability and intrinsic motivation levels", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 40(1), pp.11~19 (2010)
  8. Gauffin H, "Effect of ankle disk training on postural contril in patients with functional instabilities of the ankle joint", Int J Sports Med, 9(2), pp.141~144 (1988)
  9. Greene TA, "Comparison of support provided by a semirigid orthosis and adhesive ankle taping before, during, and after exercise", Am J Sports Med, 18(5), pp.498~506 (1990)
  10. Gross MT, "The role of ankle bracing for prevention of ankle sprain injuries", J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 33(10), pp.572~577 (2003)
  11. Hall EA, "Strength-training protocols to improve deficits in participants with chronic ankle instability : A randomized controlled trial", J Athl Train, 50(1), pp.36~44 (2015)
  12. Hertel J, "Functional instability following lateral ankle sprain", Sports Med, 29(5), pp.361~371 (2000)
  13. Hiller CE, "The cumberland ankle instability tool : A report of validity and reliability testing", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(9), pp.1235~1241 (2006)
  14. Kosik KB, "Therapeutic interventions for improving self-reported function in patients with chronic ankle instability : A systematic review", Br J Sports Med, 51(2), pp.105~112 (2017)
  15. Mattacola CG, "Rehabilitation of the Ankle After Acute Sprain or Chronic Instability", J Athl Train, 37(4), pp.413~429 (2002)
  16. Moore S, "The use of biofeedback devices to improve postural stability", Phys Ther Practice, 2, pp.1~19 (1993)
  17. Nyska M, "Dynamic force distribution during level walking under the feet of patients with chronic ankle instability", Br J Sports Med, 37(6), pp.495~497 (2003)
  18. Riemann BL, "The sensorimotor system, part I: The physiologic basis of functional joint stability", J Athl Train, 37(1), pp.71~79 (2002)
  19. Richie DH Jr, "Functional instability of the ankle and the role of neuromuscular control : A comprehensive review", J Foot Ankle Surg, 40(4), pp.240~251 (2001)
  20. Ross SE, "Examination of static and dynamic postural stability in individuals with functionally stable and unstable ankles", Clin J Sport Med, 14(6), pp.332~338 (2004)
  21. Sekir U, "Reliability of a functional test battery evaluating functionality, proprioception, and strength in recreational athletes with functional ankle instability", Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 44(4), pp.407~415 (2008)
  22. Wikstrom EA, "Understanding and treating lateral ankle sprains and their consequences : A constraints-based approach", Sports Med, 43(6), pp.385~393 (2013)
  23. Wright CJ, "A randomized controlled trial comparing rehabilitation efficacy in chronic ankle instability", J Sport Rehabil, 24, pp.1~32 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

발목 불안정성 여성들의 고유수용감각 운동이 동적자세 조절능력과 근력에 미치는 영향김도경, 이선경대한무용학회 · 대한무용학회 논문집2015 · 제73권 제5호지지면에 따른 과제 지향적 훈련이 발목 불안정성 환자의 통증과 기능 수준, 균형능력, 그리고 근 활성도 및 근 두께에 미치는 영향박삼호, 박종항, 오윤중대한정형도수물리치료학회 · 대한정형도수물리치료학회지2022 · 제28권 제1호만성 발목 불안정성 환자에 볼기근 운동을 동반한 발목 운동프로그램이 통증과 발목 불안정성 수준, 동적 균형 수준에 미치는 영향서일홍, 황병준대한정형도수물리치료학회 · 대한정형도수물리치료학회지2024 · 제30권 제2호발목 안정화 운동과 중간볼기근 강화 운동 동시 적용이 만성 발목 불안정성 성인의 발목 기능과 균형에 미치는 영향김명권, 남민주, 류진석대한정형도수물리치료학회 · 대한정형도수물리치료학회지2024 · 제30권 제2호The Effects of Elastic Ankle Taping on Static and Dynamic Postural Control in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability이충휘, Il-young Moon, Jin-seok Lim, Seo-hyun Kim한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2021 · 제28권 제3호각속도 300 °/sec에서 기능적 발목불안 유무에 따른 고유수용성감각, 발목 근력, 그리고 최고 회전력까지 걸리는 시간의 생체역학적 특성 차이김원호, 박은영한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2013 · 제20권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

근전도 바이오피드백을 이용한 숏 풋 운동이 정적으로 선 자세 동안 발의 안쪽 세로활 유지에 미치는 영향차상민, 오재섭, 문동철, 강민혁pp. 9-18기능적 테이핑이 어깨둘레근 수술 후 환자의 어깨관절 통증과 근력, 관절가동범위에 미치는 즉각적 영향문유리, 김선엽pp. 19-29Wii 균형 게임과 자가 거울 균형 운동이 만성 뇌졸중 환자의 균형 및 무릎관절 고유수용성 감각에 미치는 효과 비교전혜선, 심경섭pp. 30-40뇌성마비 아동을 대상으로 실시한 한국어판 아동 균형 척도의 라쉬분석김경모pp. 41-50학령기 경직성 뇌성마비 아동 부모의 삶의 질과 아동의 삶의 질 및 기능과 일상생활활동 수행 수준의 관련성오덕원, 이예슬pp. 51-60
원문 보기