Muscle Latency Time and Activation Patterns for Upper Extremity During Reaching and Reach to Grasp Movement
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Despite muscle latency times and patterns were used as broad examination tools to diagnose disease and recovery, previous studies have not compared the dominant arm to the non-dominant arm in muscle latency time and muscle recruitment patterns during reaching and reach-to-grasp movements. Objects: The present study aimed to investigate dominant and non-dominant hand differences in muscle latency time and recruitment pattern during reaching and reach-to-grasp movements. In addition, by manipulating the speed of movement, we examined the effect of movement speed on neuromuscular control of both right and left hands. Methods: A total of 28 right-handed (measured by Edinburgh Handedness Inventory) healthy subjects were recruited. We recorded surface electromyography muscle latency time and muscle recruitment patterns of four upper extremity muscles (i.e., anterior deltoid, triceps brachii, flexor digitorum superficialis, and extensor digitorum) from each left and right arm. Mixed-effect linear regression was used to detect differences between hands, reaching and reach-to-grasp, and the fast and preferred speed conditions. Results: There were no significant differences in muscle latency time between dominant and non-dominant hands or reaching and reach-to-grasp tasks (p>.05). However, there was a significantly longer muscle latency time in the preferred speed condition than the fast speed condition on both reaching and reach-to-grasp tasks (p<.05). Conclusion: These findings showed similar muscle latency time and muscle activation patterns with respect to movement speeds and tasks. Our findings hope to provide normative muscle physiology data for both right and left hands, thus aiding the understanding of the abnormal movements from patients and to develop appropriate rehabilitation strategies specific to dominant and non-dominant hands.
Abstract
Background: Despite muscle latency times and patterns were used as broad examination tools to diagnose disease and recovery, previous studies have not compared the dominant arm to the non-dominant arm in muscle latency time and muscle recruitment patterns during reaching and reach-to-grasp movements. Objects: The present study aimed to investigate dominant and non-dominant hand differences in muscle latency time and recruitment pattern during reaching and reach-to-grasp movements. In addition, by manipulating the speed of movement, we examined the effect of movement speed on neuromuscular control of both right and left hands. Methods: A total of 28 right-handed (measured by Edinburgh Handedness Inventory) healthy subjects were recruited. We recorded surface electromyography muscle latency time and muscle recruitment patterns of four upper extremity muscles (i.e., anterior deltoid, triceps brachii, flexor digitorum superficialis, and extensor digitorum) from each left and right arm. Mixed-effect linear regression was used to detect differences between hands, reaching and reach-to-grasp, and the fast and preferred speed conditions. Results: There were no significant differences in muscle latency time between dominant and non-dominant hands or reaching and reach-to-grasp tasks (p>.05). However, there was a significantly longer muscle latency time in the preferred speed condition than the fast speed condition on both reaching and reach-to-grasp tasks (p<.05). Conclusion: These findings showed similar muscle latency time and muscle activation patterns with respect to movement speeds and tasks. Our findings hope to provide normative muscle physiology data for both right and left hands, thus aiding the understanding of the abnormal movements from patients and to develop appropriate rehabilitation strategies specific to dominant and non-dominant hands.
참고문헌 (37)
- Annett J, "The control of movement in the preferred and non-preferred hands", Q J Exp Psychol, 31, pp.641~652 (1979)[DOI]
- Annett M, "Five tests of hand skill", Cortex, 28(4), pp.583~600 (1992)[DOI]
- Bagesteiro LB, "Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics", J Neurophysiol, 88(5), pp.2408~2421 (2000)[DOI]
- Butler TJ, "Selective recruitment of single motor units in human flexor digitorum superficialis muscle during flexion of individual fingers", J Physiol, 567, pp.301~309 (2005)[DOI]
- Carr JH, "Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill", pp.1~300 (2003), Butterworth-Heinemann
- Carson RG, "The role of impulse variability in manual-aiming asymmetries", Psychol Res, 55(4), pp.291~298 (1993)[DOI]
- Carson RG, "Asymmetries in the regulation of visually guided aiming", J Mot Behav, 25(1), pp.21~32 (1993)[DOI]
- Carson RG, "Visual feedback processing and manual asymmetries: An evolving perspective", Adv Psychol, 85, pp.49~65 (1992)
- Cisek P, "Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices", Annu Rev Neurosci, 33, pp.269~298 (2010)[DOI]
- Cools AM, "Scapular muscle recruitment pattern: Electromyographic response of the trapezius muscle to sudden shoulder movement before and after a fatiguing exercise", J Orthop Sport Phys Ther, 32(5), pp.221~229 (2002)[DOI]
- Cools AM, "Scapular muscle recruitment patterns: Trapezius muscle latency with and without impingement symptoms", Am J Sports Med, 31(4), pp.542~549 (2003)[DOI]
- Corballis MC, "The genetics and evolution of handedness", Psychol. Rev., 104(4), pp.714~727 (1997)[DOI]
- Coren S, "Fifty centuries of right-handedness: The historical record", Science, 198(4317), pp.631~632 (1977)[DOI]
- Cowan SM, "Delayed onset of electromyographic activity of vastus medialis obliquus relative to vastus lateralis in subjects with patellofemoral pain syndrome", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 82(2), pp.183~189 (2001)[DOI]
- Duff SV, "Lateralization of motor adaptation reveals independence in control of trajectory and steady-state position", Exp Brain Res, 179(4), pp.551~561 (2007)[DOI]
- Gilleard W, "The effect of patellar taping on the onset of vastus medialis obliquus and vastus lateralis muscle activity in persons with patellofemoral pain", Phys Ther, 78(1), pp.25~32 (1998)[DOI]
- Grosskopf A, "Grasping with the left and right hand: A kinematic study", Experimental Brain Research, 168(1-2), pp.230~240 (2006)[DOI]
- Hammond G, "Correlates of human handedness in primary motor cortex: A review and hypothesis", Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 26(3), pp.285~292 (2002)[DOI]
- Hermens HJ, "Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures", J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 10(5), pp.361~374 (2000)[DOI]
- Jeannerod M, "Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation", Trends Neurosci, 18(7), pp.314~320 (1995)[DOI]
- Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, "Quantitative assessment of mirror movements in children and adolescents with hemiplegic cerebral palsy", Dev Med Child Neurol, 42(11), pp.728~736 (2000)[DOI]
- Luppino G, "The Organization of the Frontal Motor Cortex", News Physiol Sci, 15, pp.219~224 (2000)
- Mani S, "Contralesional motor deficits after unilateral stroke reflect hemisphere-specific control mechanisms", Brain, 136, pp.1288~1303 (2013)[DOI]
- Mogk JP, "The effects of posture on forearm muscle loading during gripping", Ergonomics, 46(9), pp.956~975 (2003)[DOI]
- Murata A, "Object representation in the ventral premotor cortex (area F5) of the monkey", J Neurophysiol, 78(4), pp.2226~2230 (1997)[DOI]
- Oldfield RC, "The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory", Neuropsychologia, 9(1), pp.97~113 (1971)[DOI]
- Peters KM, "Muscle recruitment and coordination during upper-extremity functional tests", J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 38, pp.143~150 (2018)[DOI]
- Sabatini AM, "Identification of neuromuscular synergies in natural upper-arm movements", Biol Cybern, 86(4), pp.253~262 (2002)[DOI]
- Sainburg RL, "Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching", J Neurophysiol, 83(5), pp.2661~2675 (2000)[DOI]
- Schabowsky CN, "Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment", Exp Brain Res, 182(4), pp.567~577 (2007)[DOI]
- Schaefer SY, "Hemispheric specialization and functional impact of ipsile sional deficits in movement coordination and accuracy", Neuropsychologia, 47(13), pp.2953~2966 (2009)[DOI]
- Shenoy K, "Cortical control of arm movements: a dynamical systems perspective", Annu Rev Neurosci, 36, pp.337~359 (2013)[DOI]
- Stark E, "Encoding of reach and grasp by single neurons in premotor cortex is independent of recording site", J Neurophysiol, 97(5), pp.3351~3364 (2007)[DOI]
- Suehiro T, "Altered trunk muscle recruitment patterns during lifting in individuals in remission from recurrent low back pain", J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 39, pp.128~133 (2018)[DOI]
- van Doorn RR, "Manual asymmetries in the temporal and spatial control of aimed movements", Hum Mov Sci, 27(4), pp.551~576 (2008)[DOI]
- Wagner JM, "Upper extremity muscle activation during recovery of reaching in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis", Clin Neurophysiol, 118(1), pp.164~176 (2007)[DOI]
- Yadav V, "Limb dominance results from asymmetries in predictive and impedance control mechanisms", PLoS One, 9(4), pp.e93892~ (2014)[DOI]