본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

뇌졸중 환자의 재활참여가 기능회복에 미치는 영향

Impact of Patients’ Level of Participation in Rehabilitation on Functional Outcome in Patients With Stroke

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류물리치료학

초록

Background: Stroke recovery is a long and complex process. Successful stroke recovery seems to be strongly associated with patients’ high motivation and committed participa-tion. Patients’ motivation is a key determinant of successful rehabilitation outcomes, but it is difficult in defining and measuring. Patients’ participation is defined as the degree or extent to which subjects take part in rehabilitation activities and can be measured by observable behavior.Objects: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of patients’ level of partici-pation in rehabilitation on functional outcomes in patients with stroke.Methods: Forty post-stroke inpatients participated in this study. The level of rehabilitation participation was measured by the Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale (HRERS). Other measures used for the evaluation were the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) and Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI). Overall measurements were made at early in-tervention and late intervention. Spearman correlation and multiple regression were used to measure the relationships between HRERS, RMI, and K-MBI. Results: The correlation found between HRERS total scores at early intervention and RMI total scores of late intervention was above moderate (r = 0.607, p < 0.01). RMI total scores at early intervention (p < 0.000), HRERS total scores at early intervention (p < 0.001), and dis-ease duration (p < 0.003) were significant predictors of RMI total scores at late intervention. Conclusion: The level of participation at early intervention was associated with improve-ment in mobility. The level of mobility at early intervention, disease duration, and patients’ participation at early intervention were important determinants of functional outcome. These findings suggest that patients’ participation should be encouraged in order to achieve suc-cessful stroke recovery.

Abstract

Background: Stroke recovery is a long and complex process. Successful stroke recovery seems to be strongly associated with patients’ high motivation and committed participa-tion. Patients’ motivation is a key determinant of successful rehabilitation outcomes, but it is difficult in defining and measuring. Patients’ participation is defined as the degree or extent to which subjects take part in rehabilitation activities and can be measured by observable behavior.Objects: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of patients’ level of partici-pation in rehabilitation on functional outcomes in patients with stroke.Methods: Forty post-stroke inpatients participated in this study. The level of rehabilitation participation was measured by the Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale (HRERS). Other measures used for the evaluation were the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) and Korean version of the Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI). Overall measurements were made at early in-tervention and late intervention. Spearman correlation and multiple regression were used to measure the relationships between HRERS, RMI, and K-MBI. Results: The correlation found between HRERS total scores at early intervention and RMI total scores of late intervention was above moderate (r = 0.607, p < 0.01). RMI total scores at early intervention (p < 0.000), HRERS total scores at early intervention (p < 0.001), and dis-ease duration (p < 0.003) were significant predictors of RMI total scores at late intervention. Conclusion: The level of participation at early intervention was associated with improve-ment in mobility. The level of mobility at early intervention, disease duration, and patients’ participation at early intervention were important determinants of functional outcome. These findings suggest that patients’ participation should be encouraged in order to achieve suc-cessful stroke recovery.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Langhorne P, "Stroke rehabilitation", Lancet, 377(9778), pp.1693~1702 (2011)
  2. Mohd Nordin NA, "Exploring views on long term rehabilitation for people with stroke in a developing country : findings from focus group discussions", BMC Health Serv Res, 14, pp.118~ (2014)
  3. Cifu DX, "Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 80(5 Suppl 1), pp.S35~S39 (1999)
  4. Yagura H, "Benefit of inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation up to 1 year after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84(11), pp.1687~1691 (2003)
  5. Kwakkel G, "Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke : a meta-analysis", Stroke, 35(11), pp.2529~2539 (2004)
  6. Paolucci S, "Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation : a matched comparison conducted in Italy", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 81(6), pp.695~700 (2000)
  7. Paolucci S, "Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation:predicting no, low and high response patients", Cerebrovasc Dis, 8(4), pp.228~234 (1998)
  8. Paolucci S, "Rehabilitation of left brain-damaged ischemic stroke patients: the role of comprehension language deficits", A matched comparison. Cerebrovasc Dis, 20(5), pp.400~406 (2005)
  9. Ween JE, "Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting", Neurology, 47(2), pp.388~392 (1996)
  10. Maclean N, "A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation", Soc Sci Med, 50(4), pp.495~506 (2000)
  11. Lenze EJ, "Significance of poor patient participation in physical and occupational therapy for functional outcome and length of stay", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 85(10), pp.1599~1601 (2004)
  12. Paolucci S, "Impact of participation on rehabilitation results : a multivariate study", Eur J Phys Rehabil Med, 48(3), pp.455~466 (2012)
  13. Horton S, "Engagement and learning : an exploratory study of situated practice in multi-disciplinary stroke rehabilitation", Disabil Rehabil, 33(3), pp.270~279 (2011)
  14. Kortte KB, "The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale : development and psychometric properties", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88(7), pp.877~884 (2007)
  15. Maclean N, "Qualitative analysis of stroke patients’ motivation for rehabilitation", BMJ, 321(7268), pp.1051~1054 (2000)
  16. Horn W, "Factors associated with patients’ participation in rehabilitation services : a comparative injury analysis 12 months post-discharge", Disabil Rehabil, 22(8), pp.358~362 (2000)
  17. Resnick B, "Geriatric rehabilitation : the influence of efficacy beliefs and motivation", Rehabil Nurs, 27(4), pp.152~159 (2002)
  18. Medley AR, "Motivational Interviewing to promote self-awareness and engagement in rehabilitation following acquired brain injury : a conceptual review", Neuropsychol Rehabil, 20(4), pp.481~508 (2010)
  19. Koh GC, "Effect of duration, participation rate, and supervision during community rehabilitation on functional outcomes in the first poststroke year in Singapore", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 93(2), pp.279~286 (2012)
  20. Lenze EJ, "The Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale : reliability and validity of a clinician-rated measure of participation in acute rehabilitation", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 85(3), pp.380~384 (2004)
  21. Hsueh IP, "Comparison of psychometric properties of three mobility measures for patients with stroke", Stroke, 34(7), pp.1741~1745 (2003)
  22. 정한영, "한글판 수정바델지수(K-MBI)의 개발: 뇌졸중 환자 대상의 다기관 연구", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 31(3), pp.283~297 (2007), 대한재활의학회
  23. Chiou II, "Values of activities of daily living. A survey of stroke patients and their home therapists", Phys Ther, 65(6), pp.901~906 (1985)
  24. Luker J, "Stroke survivors’ experiences of physical rehabilitation : a systematic review of qualitative studies", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 96(9), pp.1698~1708 (2015)[DOI]
  25. Mihaljcic T, "Investigating the relationship between reduced self-awareness of falls risk, rehabilitation engagement and falls in older adults", Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 69, pp.38~44 (2017)
  26. Lenze EJ, "Cognitive and affective predictors of rehabilitation outcome in patients with hip fracture", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84(9), pp.E18~ (2003)
  27. Talkowski JB, "Patient participation and physical activity during rehabilitation and future functional outcomes in patients after hip fracture", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 90(4), pp.618~622 (2009)
  28. Bright FA, "Co-constructing engagement in stroke rehabilitation : a qualitative study exploring how practitioner engagement can influence patient engagement", Clin Rehabil, 31(10), pp.1396~1405 (2017)
  29. Yang SY, "Level and predictors of participation in patients with stroke undergoing inpatient rehabilitation", Singapore Med J, 54(10), pp.564~568 (2013)
  30. Skidmore ER, "Cognitive and affective predictors of rehabilitation participation after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 91(2), pp.203~207 (2010)
  31. Taub M, "Relationship of Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale to baseline cognition and FIM change in acute inpatient stroke rehabilitation", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 97(10), pp.e111~e112 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)