미국의 D.O.의 전문화과정과 현황
Specialization and Present Status of Doctor of Osteopathy in the U.S.A
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Backgrounds : Doctor of Osteopathy (D.O.) in the United States have drawn attention as one of the future models of Korean Medicine doctors in Korea in that they have their own fields of care and therapies that distinguish them from medical doctor (M.D.), but are also able to carry out the treatment of general doctors. By analyzing D.O.’s specialization strategy, this study intends to preview points for establishing the future role of Korean Medicine doctors. Methods : We searched books, research papers, reports, conference presentations, and media articles, and chronologically classified and organized the collected data. In addition, the latest update information on related institutions’ web pages and expert opinions released were also reviewed. Results : The D.O. emerged as a form of doctor in alternative medicine, however it rapidly turned to an M.D. substitute during the pandemic of the 1910s and World War II in the 1940s. Through the American Osteopathic Association (AOA)’s organizational activity, curriculum specialization, research development, and financial support, D.O. now has secured the status of M.D. in 50 states and federal law in the US. It has its own and exclusive full practice rights, capable of prescribing drugs and practicing surgery, as well as manual therapy. Beginning in July 2020, M.D.-D.O. achieved the full integration-unification of the professional training and residency program. Conclusions : In order to introduce the D.O. model to Korean Medicine system, it is necessary to strengthen biomedicine in the curriculum, and significantly expand the educational infrastructure and faculty manpower.
Abstract
Backgrounds : Doctor of Osteopathy (D.O.) in the United States have drawn attention as one of the future models of Korean Medicine doctors in Korea in that they have their own fields of care and therapies that distinguish them from medical doctor (M.D.), but are also able to carry out the treatment of general doctors. By analyzing D.O.’s specialization strategy, this study intends to preview points for establishing the future role of Korean Medicine doctors. Methods : We searched books, research papers, reports, conference presentations, and media articles, and chronologically classified and organized the collected data. In addition, the latest update information on related institutions’ web pages and expert opinions released were also reviewed. Results : The D.O. emerged as a form of doctor in alternative medicine, however it rapidly turned to an M.D. substitute during the pandemic of the 1910s and World War II in the 1940s. Through the American Osteopathic Association (AOA)’s organizational activity, curriculum specialization, research development, and financial support, D.O. now has secured the status of M.D. in 50 states and federal law in the US. It has its own and exclusive full practice rights, capable of prescribing drugs and practicing surgery, as well as manual therapy. Beginning in July 2020, M.D.-D.O. achieved the full integration-unification of the professional training and residency program. Conclusions : In order to introduce the D.O. model to Korean Medicine system, it is necessary to strengthen biomedicine in the curriculum, and significantly expand the educational infrastructure and faculty manpower.
참고문헌 (39)
- "National Assembly drives public opinion" (2020)[URL]
- "Draft of agreement on modern medical device and medical unification contains" (2015)[URL]
- Wu P, "A Brief Guide to Osteopathic Medicine For Students, By Students", American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine, 3~7 (2015)
- Meyer CT, "Osteopathic medicine : a call for reform", The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 93(4), pp.473~485 (1993)
- "Part of cure for doctor shortage:Osteopaths" (2012)[URL]
- Na S., "The professionalization of American D.O.s", Presentation handout in the Conference of Korean Medicine Policy Research Society (2013)
- "US Doctor of Osteopathy (DO) with a similar starting point to Korean Medicine" (2020)[URL]
- "The Evolution of Osteopathic Medical Education"[URL]
- Still AT., "Autobiography of Andrew of T. Still with a History of the Discovery and Development of the Science of Osteopathy", 108~ (1897)
- Gevitz N, "A Degree of Difference: The Origins of Osteopathy and First Use of the DO Designation", The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 114(1), pp.33~ (2014)
- "Dr. A. T. Still’s Visit to the Spiritualists’ Meeting at Clinton, Iowa. 1903:3-6. Andrew Taylor Still Papers" (2009)[URL]
- Gevitz N., "D.O.s, Osteopathic Medicine In America" (2021)
- American Osteopathic Association, "1998 Yearbook and directory of Osteopathic Physicians", ~ (1998)
- Gevitz N., "The D.O.’s: Osteopathic Medicine in America" (2004)
- Hulett CMT, "Historical Sketch of the AAAO", JAOA, 1, pp.1~15 (1901)
- Booth ER, "History of Osteopathy and Twentieth-Century Medical Practice", pp.106~108 (1924), Caxton Press
- Samanta A, "Legal considerations of clinical guidelines : will NICE make a difference?", Journal of The Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), pp.133~138 (2003)
- Ward R, "Why some Osteopaths study at Medical Colleges", Osteopathic Physician, 31, pp.25~27 (1917)
- Martin A, "Very, Very, Very, Dreadful : The Influenza Pandemic of 1918" (2018), Alfred A. Knopf
- McConnell C, "Editorial: The Treatment of Influenza", JAOA, 18, pp.83~85 (1918)
- Eckberg DL, "The dilemma of osteopathic physicians and the rationalization of medical practice", Social Science & Medicine, 25(10), pp.1111~1120 (1987)
- Howell JD, "The paradox of osteopathy", New England Journal of Medicine, 341(19), pp.1465~1468 (1999)
- Gevitz N, "The transformation of osteopathic medical education", Academic Medicine, 84(6), pp.701~706 (2009)
- Richard A, "Economic and Demographic Trends Signal and impending physician Shortage", Health Affairs, 21(1), pp.140~154 (2002)
- Gevitz N, "The sword and the scalpel— the osteopathic ‘war’ to enter the Military Medical Corps : 1916–1966", JAOA, 98(5), pp.279~286 (1998)
- Carl JM, "A Primer on Graduate Medical Education Financing", JAOA, 93(10), pp.1055~1059 (1993)
- "Complex-USA Bulletin of Information"[URL]
- "Curriculum of College of Osteopathic Medicine"[URL]
- "American OMP (Osteopathic Medical Profession) Report"[URL]
- "National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2008-2018 National Summary Tables"[URL]
- "ACGME Releases 2020-2021 Statistics on Graduate Medical Education Programs and Resident Physicians" (2021)[URL]
- "NRMP Program Results 2018-2022 Main Residency Match"[URL]
- Healy CJ, "Osteopathic manipulative treatment(OMT)use among osteopathic physicians in the United States", Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 121(1), pp.57~61 (2021)
- Johnson SM, "Diminished use of osteopathic manipulative treatment and its impact on the uniqueness of the osteopathic profession", Academic Medicine, 76(8), pp.821~828 (2001)
- Licciardone J, "Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes associated with osteopathic manipulative treatment", JAOA, 102(1), pp.13~20 (2002)
- Stoll ST, "Physicians and patients attitudes toward manual medicine : implications for continuing medical education", The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 23(1), pp.13~20 (2003)
- Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, "2020 Year Book of Korean Medicine" (2022)
- "AACOM Reports on Curriculum"[URL]
- Association of Korean Medicine, "Post Corona 19, Expanding Physician Workforce using Korean Medicine Doctors and Colleges – Proceedings of National Assembly Conference", ~ (2020)