골다공증 한약제제 임상시험 참여자의골다공증 한의치료에 대한 인식 : 질적 연구
Patients’ Perceptions of Korean Medicine Treatment for Osteoporosis in a Clinical Trial of an Osteoporosis Herbal Medicine Drug: a Qualitative Stud
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective: This research aimed to understand patients’ perceptions of Korean medicine treatment for osteoporosis in a clinical trial setting. Methods: Ten patients participating in a clinical trial of a herbal medicine drug for osteoporosis were invited to an interview. Data were collected by in-depth interviews and patient observations. This qualitative study adopted the case study research method, and within-case and cross-case analyses were conducted. Results: A model of the patients’ osteoporosis management planning was derived from the study. The results showed that the patients’ perceptions of osteoporosis were derived from their knowledge and experience during diagnosis and treatment of the condition. Two groups of patients were recognized: those who overlooked the importance of osteoporosis and those who recognized the importance of osteoporosis. Before making treatment decisions about osteoporosis, the patients evaluated the treatment options and weighed the advantages and disadvantages of each option. When evaluating their treatment, the patients combined their knowledge and experience of Korean and western medicine treatments. Their experience of participating in the clinical trial influenced the management planning of osteoporosis. Two major reasons for low compliance with osteoporosis treatment were ignorance of the disease and insufficient information provided by doctors. Conclusion: The results of this qualitative study pointed to four strategies that could be employed to improve accessibility to Korean medicine treatment for osteoporosis: the dissemination of comprehensive information on osteoporosis in the clinic and mass media, promotion of Korean medicine therapies for osteoporosis, management of clinical trial participants, and insurance coverage for Korean medicine.
Abstract
Objective: This research aimed to understand patients’ perceptions of Korean medicine treatment for osteoporosis in a clinical trial setting. Methods: Ten patients participating in a clinical trial of a herbal medicine drug for osteoporosis were invited to an interview. Data were collected by in-depth interviews and patient observations. This qualitative study adopted the case study research method, and within-case and cross-case analyses were conducted. Results: A model of the patients’ osteoporosis management planning was derived from the study. The results showed that the patients’ perceptions of osteoporosis were derived from their knowledge and experience during diagnosis and treatment of the condition. Two groups of patients were recognized: those who overlooked the importance of osteoporosis and those who recognized the importance of osteoporosis. Before making treatment decisions about osteoporosis, the patients evaluated the treatment options and weighed the advantages and disadvantages of each option. When evaluating their treatment, the patients combined their knowledge and experience of Korean and western medicine treatments. Their experience of participating in the clinical trial influenced the management planning of osteoporosis. Two major reasons for low compliance with osteoporosis treatment were ignorance of the disease and insufficient information provided by doctors. Conclusion: The results of this qualitative study pointed to four strategies that could be employed to improve accessibility to Korean medicine treatment for osteoporosis: the dissemination of comprehensive information on osteoporosis in the clinic and mass media, promotion of Korean medicine therapies for osteoporosis, management of clinical trial participants, and insurance coverage for Korean medicine.
참고문헌 (24)
- WHO Study Group, "Assessment of fracture risk and application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis", World Health Organ Technical Report Series, 843, pp.1~129 (1994), World Health Organ Technical Report Series
- WHO, "Prevention and management of osteoporosis" (2003)
- Kim YA, "Osteoporosis or Low Bone Mass in Adults Aged 50 years old and above in Republic of Korea, 2008-2011" (2014), Korea centers for disease control and prevention
- Cho ES, "Prevalence and management of Osteoporosis: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008-2011" (2013), Korea centers for disease control and prevention
- "Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Report" (2016)[URL]
- Korean society for bone and mineral research guideline compilation committee, "Physician’s guide for diagnosis & treatment of osteoporosis 2015" (2015), Korean society for bone and mineral research
- Seo MS, "The Review on the Study of Osteoporosis in Korean Medicine Journals", The Journal of Korea CHUNA Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves, 8(2), pp.67~78 (2013)
- Alami S, "Barriers to Effective Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Treatment: A Qualitative Study of Patients' and Practitioners' Views", PloS one, 11(6), pp.e0158365~ (2016)
- Salter C, "Abandoned acid? Understanding adherence to bisphosphonate medications for the prevention of osteoporosis among older women: a qualitative longitudinal study", PloS one, 9(1), pp.e83552~ (2014)
- Kendler DL, "Influence of patient perceptions and preferences for osteoporosis medication on adherence behavior in the Denosumab Adherence Preference Satisfaction study", Menopause, 21(1), pp.25~32 (2014)
- Speziale HJ, "Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative" (2007), Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
- Stake, RE, "Multiple case study analysis" (2006), Guilford Press
- Stake RE, "The art of case study research" (1995), Sage
- Merriam SB, "Qualitative research and case study applications in education" (1998), Jossey-Bass
- Weiss RS, "Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies" (1994), Free Press
- Merriam, SB, "Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation" (2009), Jossey-Bass
- Miles MB, "Qualitative data analysis: a sourcebook of new methods" (1994), Sage
- Lincoln YS, "Naturalistic inquiry" (1996), Sage
- Tong A, "Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research(COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups", Int J Qual Health Care, 19(6), pp.349~357 (2007)
- Strull WM, "Do patients want to participate in medical decision making", JAMA, 252(21), pp.2990~2994 (1984)
- Haynes RB, "Systematic review of randomised trials of interventions to assist patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Lancet 1996 Aug 10;348(9024):383-6. Review", Erratum in: Lancet, 349(9059), pp.1180~ (1997)
- Tong A, "Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ", BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, pp.181~ (2012)
- Barbour SR, "Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog", BMJ, 322(7294), pp.1115~1117 (2001)
- Warriner AH, "Adherence to osteoporosis treatments: room for improvement", Curr Opin Rheumatol, 21(4), pp.356~362 (2009)