In vivo nutritive value of rice feed for sheep and its application for cattle feed
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutritive value of polished rice (PR) vs unpolished rice (UPR) as a potential feedstuff for sheep in order to use as a replacer to corn in sheep diet, and as well as to present the application in the formulation of cattle diet. Six corriedale ewe were randomly assigned to each treatment. UPR and PR were provided as a dietary treatment together with timothy grass as a basal diet in a crossover design for two period with 15-d duration for each period. The ratio of experimental and basal feeds were 33.3% and 66.7%, respectively. The differences in the total digestible nutrient (TDN) contents between sheep and cattle was determined according to the references. The number of data collected sheep and cattle was 9 and 17, respectively. The PR showed higher nutrients digestibility than UPR. Similarly, higher TDN content was observed PR than UPR (p < 0.05). As a result, the replacement of corn in the formulate feed with UPR and PR feed rice could be possible with the ratio of 91.2% and 100.0%, respectively. The result of comparation the TDN contents of UPR and PR in sheep and cattle, the PR has no difference in the nutritive value which suggests the applicability of the results of sheep to cattle. On the other hand, UPR has known to have different nutritive value between sheep and cattle, so caution should be taken when preparing formula feeds for cattle.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the nutritive value of polished rice (PR) vs unpolished rice (UPR) as a potential feedstuff for sheep in order to use as a replacer to corn in sheep diet, and as well as to present the application in the formulation of cattle diet. Six corriedale ewe were randomly assigned to each treatment. UPR and PR were provided as a dietary treatment together with timothy grass as a basal diet in a crossover design for two period with 15-d duration for each period. The ratio of experimental and basal feeds were 33.3% and 66.7%, respectively. The differences in the total digestible nutrient (TDN) contents between sheep and cattle was determined according to the references. The number of data collected sheep and cattle was 9 and 17, respectively. The PR showed higher nutrients digestibility than UPR. Similarly, higher TDN content was observed PR than UPR (p < 0.05). As a result, the replacement of corn in the formulate feed with UPR and PR feed rice could be possible with the ratio of 91.2% and 100.0%, respectively. The result of comparation the TDN contents of UPR and PR in sheep and cattle, the PR has no difference in the nutritive value which suggests the applicability of the results of sheep to cattle. On the other hand, UPR has known to have different nutritive value between sheep and cattle, so caution should be taken when preparing formula feeds for cattle.
참고문헌 (30)
- "Agricultural outlook 2018 -Ⅱ-", Korea Rural Economic Institute, 401~421 (2018)
- "Rice supply imbalance, how to resolve it? - Way to reduce rice production", Policy Forum Conducted at the Meeting of Seoul LWconvetion (2016), Korea Rural Economic Institute
- 기광석, "Evaluation of the nutritional value of locally produced forage in Korea using chemical analysis and in vitro ruminal fermentation", Animal Bioscience, 30(3), pp.355~362 (2017), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
- "Manual of forage rice production and utilization", National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 122~127 (2015)
- 이상민, "쌀, 보리, 옥수수의 반추위내 In situ 및 In vitro 분해율, 미생물 성장과 Gas 발생량에 대한 연구", 한국축산학회지, 48(5), pp.699~708 (2006), 한국축산학회
- 오영균, "한우에 대한 현미의 사료가치 평가", 한국축산학회지, 48(3), pp.393~400 (2006), 한국축산학회
- McDonald P, "Animal nutrition", pp.237~253 (2010), Pearson
- Cannas A, "Modeling nutrient utilization in farm animals", pp.99~113 (2006), CABI Publishing
- Jayanegara A, "Estimation and validation of total digestible nutrient values of forage and concentrate feedstuffs", IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, 546, pp.042016~ (2019)
- National Academy Press, , 1985
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists, , 1990
- Forage fiber analysis (apparatus reagents, procedures and some applications), "Goering HK", Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, ~, pp.Agriculture Handbook No. 379 (1979)
- National Academy Press, , 1989
- Han, IK, "Animal feed science", pp.345~ (1995), Seonjinmunhwasa
- Korea Feed Information Center, "Korean tables of feed composition", pp.1982, Seoul National University
- National Academy Press, , 1966
- National Academy Press, , 1978
- National Academy Press, , 1964
- National Academy Press, , 1975
- National Academy Press, , 1985
- Japan Livestock Industry Association, , 2006
- Macgregor, CA, "Directory of feeds and feed ingredients" (2000), WD Hoard & Sons Company
- SPSS, "IBM SPSS statistics 22.0", IBM Corp, ~ (2013)
- Charles AM, "Directory of feeds & feed ingredients (Hoard’s dairyman)", pp.63~ (2000), WD Hoard & Sons Company
- Averts JV, "Comparative digestibility of feedstuffs by sheep and cows", Anim Feed Sci Techno, 12, pp.47~56 (1984)
- National Livestock Research Institute, "Standard tables of feed composition in Korea", pp.2~3 (2002), Rural Development Administration
- Scheibler RB, "Replacement of corn grain by brown rice grain in dairy cow rations : nutritional and productive effects", Anim Feed Sci Techn, 208, pp.214~219 (2015)