Enhancing animal breeding through quality control in genomic data - a review
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
High-throughput genotyping and sequencing has revolutionized animal breeding by providing access to vast amounts of genomic data to facilitate precise selection for desirable traits. This shift from traditional methods to genomic selection provides dense marker information for predicting genetic variants. However, the success of genomic selection heavily depends on the accuracy and quality of the genomic data. Inaccurate or low-quality data can lead to flawed predictions, compromising breeding programs and reducing genetic gains. Therefore, stringent quality control (QC) measures are essential at every stage of data processing. QC in genomic data involves managing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) quality, assessing call rates, and filtering based on minor allele frequency (MAF) and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). High-quality SNP data is crucial because genotyping errors can bias the estimates of breeding values. Cost-effective low-density genotyping platforms often require imputation to deduce missing genotypes. QC is vital for genomic selection, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and population genetics analyses because it ensures data accuracy and reliability. This paper reviews QC strategies for genomic data and emphasizes their applications in animal breeding programs. By examining various QC tools and methods, this review highlights the importance of data integrity in achieving successful outcomes in genomic selection, GWAS, and population analyses. Furthermore, this review covers the critical role of robust QC measures in enhancing the reliability of genomic predictions and advancing animal breeding practices.
Abstract
High-throughput genotyping and sequencing has revolutionized animal breeding by providing access to vast amounts of genomic data to facilitate precise selection for desirable traits. This shift from traditional methods to genomic selection provides dense marker information for predicting genetic variants. However, the success of genomic selection heavily depends on the accuracy and quality of the genomic data. Inaccurate or low-quality data can lead to flawed predictions, compromising breeding programs and reducing genetic gains. Therefore, stringent quality control (QC) measures are essential at every stage of data processing. QC in genomic data involves managing single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) quality, assessing call rates, and filtering based on minor allele frequency (MAF) and Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). High-quality SNP data is crucial because genotyping errors can bias the estimates of breeding values. Cost-effective low-density genotyping platforms often require imputation to deduce missing genotypes. QC is vital for genomic selection, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and population genetics analyses because it ensures data accuracy and reliability. This paper reviews QC strategies for genomic data and emphasizes their applications in animal breeding programs. By examining various QC tools and methods, this review highlights the importance of data integrity in achieving successful outcomes in genomic selection, GWAS, and population analyses. Furthermore, this review covers the critical role of robust QC measures in enhancing the reliability of genomic predictions and advancing animal breeding practices.
참고문헌 (50)
- Hayes BJ, "Invited review: genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges", J Dairy Sci, 92, pp.433~443 (2009)[DOI]
- Meuwissen THE, "Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps", Genetics, 157, pp.1819~1829 (2001)[DOI]
- Wiggans GR, "The genomic evaluation system in the United States : past, present, future", J Dairy Sci, 94, pp.3202~3211 (2011)[DOI]
- Anderson CA, "Data quality control in genetic case-control association studies", Nat Protoc, 5, pp.1564~1573 (2010)[DOI]
- Purcell S, "PLINK : a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses", Am J Hum Genet, 81, pp.559~575 (2007)[DOI]
- García-Ruiz A, "Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection", Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 113, pp.E3995~E4004 (2016)[DOI]
- Laurie CC, "Quality control and quality assurance in genotypic data for genome-wide association studies", Genet Epidemiol, 34, pp.591~602 (2010)[DOI]
- Marees AT, "A tutorial on conducting genome-wide association studies : quality control and statistical analysis", Int J Methods Psychiatr Res, 27, pp.e1608~ (2018)[DOI]
- "FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data" (2010)[URL]
- Bolger AM, "Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data", Bioinformatics, 30, pp.2114~2120 (2014)[DOI]
- Martin M, "Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads", EMBnet J, 17, pp.10~12 (2011)[DOI]
- Li H, Durbin R, "Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform", Bioinformatics, 25, pp.1754~1760 (2009)[DOI]
- Langmead B, "Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2", Nat Methods, 9, pp.357~359 (2012)[DOI]
- Li H, "The sequence alignment", map format and SAMtools, 2009, pp.25, 2078~2079
- McKenna A, "The Genome Analysis Toolkit : a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data", Genome Res, 20, pp.1297~1303 (2010)[DOI]
- Danecek P, "The variant call format and VCFtools", Bioinformatics, 27, pp.2156~2158 (2011)[DOI]
- "Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing" (2012)[URL]
- Cingolani P, "A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3", Fly, 6, pp.80~92 (2012)[DOI]
- Wang K, "ANNOVAR : functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data", Nucleic Acids Res, 38, pp.e164~ (2010)[DOI]
- Robinson JT, "Integrative genomics viewer", Nat Biotechnol, 29, pp.24~26 (2011)[DOI]
- Kennedy GC, "Large-scale genotyping of complex DNA", Nat Biotechnol, 21, pp.1233~1237 (2003)[DOI]
- Matsuzaki H, "Genotyping over 100, 000 SNPs on a pair of oligonucleotide arrays", Nat Methods, 1, pp.109~111 (2004)[DOI]
- Matukumalli LK, "Development and characterization of a high density SNP genotyping assay for cattle", PLOS ONE, 4, pp.e5350~ (2009)[DOI]
- BovineSNP50 Genotyping BeadChip, "llumina", llumina, ~, pp.Pub. No.: 370-2007-029 (2009)
- "GenomeStudio Software" (2010)[URL]
- Pryce JE, "Identification of genomic regions associated with inbreeding depression in Holstein and Jersey dairy cattle", Genet Sel Evol, 46, pp.71~ (2014)[DOI]
- Kim S, "Genome-wide identification of candidate genes for milk production traits in Korean Holstein cattle", Animals, 11, pp.1392~ (2021)[DOI]
- Verma SS, "Imputation and quality control steps for combining multiple genome-wide datasets", Front Genet, 5, pp.370~ (2014)[DOI]
- Lee J, "Genomic analysis using Bayesian methods under different genotyping platforms in Korean Duroc pigs", Animals, 10, pp.752~ (2020)[DOI]
- "SNP & Variation Suite™(Version 8.x)" (2024)[URL]
- Edwards AWF, "G. H. Hardy (1908) and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium", Genetics, 179, pp.1143~1150 (2008)[DOI]
- Nielsen E, "An introduction to population genetics: theory and application" (2013), Sinauer Associates
- Mayo O, "A century of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium", Twin Res Hum Genet, 11, pp.249~256 (2008)[DOI]
- Graffelman J, "Testing for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium at biallelic genetic markers on the X chromosome", Heredity, 116, pp.558~568 (2016)[DOI]
- Hill WG, "Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation", Philos Trans R Soc B Biol, 365, pp.73~85 (2010)[DOI]
- Alexander DH, "Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals", Genome Res, 19, pp.1655~1664 (2009)[DOI]
- Minelli C, "How should we use information about HWE in the meta-analyses of genetic association studies?", Int J Epidemiol, 37, pp.136~146 (2008)[DOI]
- McVean G, "A genealogical interpretation of principal components analysis", PLOS Genet, 5, pp.e1000686~ (2009)[DOI]
- Browning BL, "A unified approach to genotype imputation and haplotype-phase inference for large data sets of trios and unrelated individuals", Am J Hum Genet, 84, pp.210~223 (2009)[DOI]
- Sargolzaei M, "A new approach for efficient genotype imputation using information from relatives", BMC Genomics, 15, pp.478~ (2014)[DOI]
- Pearson TA, "How to interpret a genome-wide association study", JAMA, 299, pp.1335~1344 (2008)[DOI]
- Kohavi R, "A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection", Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp.1137~1143 (1995)
- Meuwissen T, "Genomic selection : a paradigm shift in animal breeding", Anim Front, 6, pp.6~14 (2016)[DOI]
- Zhang Z, "Advances in genomic selection in domestic animals", Chin Sci Bull, 56, pp.2655~2663 (2011)[DOI]
- Berry DP, "Imputation of genotypes from low- to high-density genotyping platforms and implications for genomic selection", Animal, 5, pp.1162~1169 (2011)[DOI]
- Howie BN, "A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies", PLOS Genet, 5, pp.e1000529~ (2009)[DOI]
- Howie B, "Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing", Nat Genet, 44, pp.955~959 (2012)[DOI]
- VanRaden PM, "Symposium review : how to implement genomic selection", J Dairy Sci, 103, pp.5291~5301 (2020)
- Habier D, "Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection", BMC Bioinformatics, 12, pp.186~ (2011)[DOI]
- Misztal I, "Computing procedures for genetic evaluation including phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information", J Dairy Sci, 92, pp.4648~4655 (2009)[DOI]
