본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

효율적인 웹 취약점 자동점검 방안에 대한 연구

Research on Efficient Automated Web Vulnerability Inspection Methods

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류컴퓨터학

초록

본 연구는 웹 애플리케이션을 손쉽게 제작할 수 있는 현대의 인터넷 환경에서, 수동점검만으로는 웹 애플리케이션 서비스의 안정성을 충분히 확보하기 어렵다는 문제를 해결하고자 자동점검을통해 수동점검을 얼마나 대체할 수 있는지를 확인하고, 부족한 부분에 대한 개선사항을 파악한후 이를 자동점검 솔루션에 반영하는 것을 목표로 한다. 이를 위해 상용 솔루션을 사용하여 175 개의 홈페이지를 대상으로 자동점검과 수동점검을 비교 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 행정안전부의 웹취약점 점검항목 21개 중 10개 항목에서 자동점검이 가능하다는 것이 확인되었다. 특히, 가장 많이 발견된 상위 5개 항목이 전체 취약점의 약 80%를 차지하여 자동점검의 실효성이 입증되었다고 볼 수 있다. 그러나 구조가 복잡한 항목은 자동점검이 어려워, 수동점검과 자동점검을 서로 보완하여 사용할 때 웹 취약점 점검의 효율성을 극대화할 수 있다.

Abstract

In the modern Internet environment where web applications can be easily produced, this study aims to check how much manual inspection can be replaced through automatic inspection to solve the problem that it is difficult to secure sufficient stability of web application services only with manual inspection, identify improvements to the shortcomings, and reflect them in the automatic inspection solution. To this end, automatic inspection and manual inspection were compared and analyzed for 175 homepages using a commercial solution. As a result of the analysis, it was confirmed that automatic inspection is possible in 10 items out of 21 web vulnerability inspection items of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security. In particular, the top five items found the most accounted for about 80% of the total vulnerabilities, so the effectiveness of automatic inspection has been proven. However, items with complex structures are difficult to automatically check, so when manual inspection and automatic inspection are used complementarily, the efficiency of web vulnerability inspection can be maximized.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. National Statistical Portal, "Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology and services used", ~ (2024)
  2. SOTI Report, "Akamai", ~ (2023)
  3. 2024 Data Breach Investigagions Report, "Verizon business", ~ (2024)
  4. Tae-Seop Kim, "Improvement Mechanism for Automatic Web Vulnerability Diagnosis", The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 22(2), pp.125~134 (2022)
  5. Kim, Gwang-Hyun, "Implementation and Design of Proxy System for Web vulnerability Analysis", The Journal of The Korea Institute of Electronic Communication Sciences, 9(9), pp.1011~1018 (2014)
  6. Jae-Ho Lee, "Model-based Web Vulnerability Inspection Using Web Page's Function Analysis and Inspection Priority", The Convergent Research Society Among Humanities, Sociology, Science, and Technology, 9(3), pp.727~736 (2019)
  7. Jang Hee-Seo, "WVulnerability Analysis using the Web Vulnerability Scanner", Convergence security journal, 12(4), pp.71~76 (2012)
  8. "OWASP ZAP"[URL]
  9. "Burp Suite"[URL]
  10. "Acunetix"[URL]
  11. "Sparrow Dast"[URL]
  12. "Web Security Checker"[URL]
  13. "HCL AppScan"[URL]
  14. "SecureGuard WSE"[URL]
  15. "The Ministry of Public Administration and Security's criteria for checking security vulnerabilities for mobile service servers (webs and apps)", ~ (2014)
  16. Korea Internet & Security Agency, "Detailed Guide to Analysis and Evaluation of Technological Vulnerabilities in Major Information and Communication Infrastructure", ~ (2021)
  17. YeongSik Pak, "An Empirical Study on the Web Vulnerabilities Analysis Model of Homepages", IT Policy Management, pp.2021
  18. Jeongwon Choi, "Proposal of a Web Vulnerability Automated Assessment Framework Using AI", Proceedings of Symposium of the Korean Institute of communications and Information Sciences (2024)
  19. Young-Bok Cho, "Secure Coding for SQL Injection Prevention Using Generative AI", Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information, 29(9), pp.61~68 (2024)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (38건)