본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Preoperative Nomogram for Predicting Chemoresistance to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Carcinoma Treated with Radical Hysterectomy

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with chemoresistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical hysterectomy (RH) and construct a nomogram to predict the chemoresistance in patients with locally advanced cervical squamous carcinoma (LACSC). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 516 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2003) stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer treated with NACT and RH between 2007 and 2017. Clinicopathologic data were collected, and patients were assigned to training (n=381) and validation (n=135) sets. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze factors associated with chemoresistance to NACT. A nomogram was built using the multivariate logistic regression analysis results. We evaluated the discriminative ability and accuracy of the model using a concordance index and a calibration curve. The predictive probability of chemoresistance to NACT was defined as > 34%. Results Multivariate analysis confirmed menopausal status, clinical tumor diameter, serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen level, and parametrial invasion on magnetic resonance imaging before treatment as independent prognostic factors associated with chemoresistance to NACT. The concordance indices of the nomogram for training and validation sets were 0.861 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.822 to 0.900) and 0.807 (95% CI, 0.807 to 0.888), respectively. Calibration plots revealed a good fit between the model-predicted probabilities and actual probabilities (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p=0.597). Furthermore, grouping based on the nomogram was associated with progression-free survival. Conclusion We developed a nomogram for predicting chemoresistance in LACSC patients treated with RH. This nomogram can help physicians make clinical decisions regarding primary management and postoperative follow-up of the patients.

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with chemoresistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical hysterectomy (RH) and construct a nomogram to predict the chemoresistance in patients with locally advanced cervical squamous carcinoma (LACSC). Materials and Methods This retrospective study included 516 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2003) stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer treated with NACT and RH between 2007 and 2017. Clinicopathologic data were collected, and patients were assigned to training (n=381) and validation (n=135) sets. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to analyze factors associated with chemoresistance to NACT. A nomogram was built using the multivariate logistic regression analysis results. We evaluated the discriminative ability and accuracy of the model using a concordance index and a calibration curve. The predictive probability of chemoresistance to NACT was defined as > 34%. Results Multivariate analysis confirmed menopausal status, clinical tumor diameter, serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen level, and parametrial invasion on magnetic resonance imaging before treatment as independent prognostic factors associated with chemoresistance to NACT. The concordance indices of the nomogram for training and validation sets were 0.861 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.822 to 0.900) and 0.807 (95% CI, 0.807 to 0.888), respectively. Calibration plots revealed a good fit between the model-predicted probabilities and actual probabilities (Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p=0.597). Furthermore, grouping based on the nomogram was associated with progression-free survival. Conclusion We developed a nomogram for predicting chemoresistance in LACSC patients treated with RH. This nomogram can help physicians make clinical decisions regarding primary management and postoperative follow-up of the patients.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Bhatla N, "Cancer of the cervix uteri", Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 143(Suppl 2), pp.22~36 (2018)
  2. He D, "The safety and efficacy of the preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer : a systematic review and meta analysis", Int J Clin Exp Med, 8, pp.14693~14700 (2015)
  3. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 21randomised trials", Eur J Cancer, 39, pp.2470~2486 (2003)
  4. Hsieh HY, "Definite chemoradiotherapy is a competent treatment option in FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer compared with radical surgery +", – neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 2019, pp.118, 99~108
  5. Katsumata N, "Phase III randomised controlled trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery vs radical surgery alone for stages IB2, IIA2, and IIB cervical cancer : a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial(JCOG 0102)", Br J Cancer, 108, pp.1957~1963 (2013)
  6. Marita A, "Longterm survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: results of the Oncology Institute “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta” experience", J Med Life, 11, pp.42~50 (2018)
  7. Chen H, "Clinical efficacy of modified preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced(stage IB2 to IIB)cervical cancer : randomized study", Gynecol Oncol, 110, pp.308~315 (2008)
  8. Li J, "Pretreatment serum lactate dehydrogenase is an independent prognostic factor for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer", Cancer Med, 5, pp.1863~1872 (2016)
  9. Yin M, "Evaluation of chemotherapy response with serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen level in cervical cancer patients : a prospective cohort study", PLoS One, 8, pp.e54969~ (2013)
  10. Sun C, "Radiomic analysis for pretreatment prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer : a multicentre study", EBioMedicine, 46, pp.160~169 (2019)
  11. Mayr NA, "Method and timing of tumor volume measurement for outcome prediction in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging", Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 52, pp.14~22 (2002)
  12. Eisenhauer EA, "New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)", Eur J Cancer, 45, pp.228~247 (2009)
  13. Iasonos A, "How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis", J Clin Oncol, 26, pp.1364~1370 (2008)
  14. Scambia G, "Squamous cell carcinoma antigen : prognostic significance and role in the monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in cervical cancer", J Clin Oncol, 12, pp.2309~2316 (1994)
  15. Wang T, "Preoperative prediction of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis in earlystage cervical cancer using radiomics nomogram developed based on T2-weighted MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging", Eur J Radiol, 114, pp.128~135 (2019)
  16. Poujade O, "Pathologic response rate after concomitant neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix : a retrospective multicentric study", Int J Gynecol Cancer, 20, pp.815~820 (2010)
  17. Del Prete S, "Clinical and pathological factors predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer : a single center experience", Oncol Lett, 18, pp.3873~3879 (2019)
  18. Ouldamer L, "Risk scoring system for predicting axillary response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in initially node-positive women with breast cancer", Surg Oncol, 27, pp.158~165 (2018)
  19. Kong TW, "Preoperative nomogram for prediction of microscopic parametrial infiltration in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy", Gynecol Oncol, 142, pp.109~114 (2016)
  20. Resende U, "Predictors of pathological complete response in women with clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast carcinoma", Oncology, 95, pp.229~238 (2018)
  21. Hug V, "Chemoresistance is not a cause of the apparent failure of adjuvant chemotherapy in postmenopausal women", Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol, 24, pp.713~718 (1988)
  22. Hricak H, "Invasive cervical carcinoma : comparison of MR imaging and surgical findings", Radiology, 166, pp.623~631 (1988)
  23. Park JS, "ERCC1(excision repair cross-complementation group 1)expression as a predictor for response of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for FIGO stage 2B uterine cervix cancer", Gynecol Oncol, 120, pp.275~279 (2011)
  24. Rein DT, "The role of chemotherapy in invasive cancer of the cervix uteri : current standards and future prospects", Anticancer Drugs, 12, pp.787~795 (2001)
  25. Jiapaer S, "Potential strategies overcoming the temozolomide resistance for glioblastoma", Neurol Med Chir(Tokyo), 58, pp.405~421 (2018)
  26. Fu J, "The role of squamous cell carcinoma antigen(SCC Ag)in outcome prediction after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and treatment decisions for patients with cervical cancer", Radiat Oncol, 14, pp.146~ (2019)
  27. Wang D, "Cellular processing of platinum anticancer drugs", Nat Rev Drug Discov, 4, pp.307~320 (2005)
  28. Weaver BA, "How taxol", paclitaxel kills cancer cells, 2014, pp.25, 2677~2681
  29. Lapresa M, "Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer : an update", Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 15, pp.1171~1181 (2015)

관련 논문AI추천

Survival Nomograms after Curative Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Surgery for Stage IB2-IIIB Cervical CancerAlessia Romito, Angela Musella, Anna Di Pinto, Claudia Marchetti, Francesca De Felice, Innocenza Palaia, Ludovico Muzii, Marco Monti, PierLuigi Benedetti Panici, Vincenzo Tombolini대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제3호An Alternative Triage Strategy Based on Preoperative MRI for Avoiding Trimodality Therapy in Stage IB Cervical Cancer김기동, 김민아, 김재원, 김학재, 박노현, 송용상, 염진아, 이정윤, 조정연대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제1호Neoadjuvant and postoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus cisplatin for the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer in pregnancy공태욱, 손주혁, 유희석, 이용희, 이은주, 장석준대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2014 · 제57권 제06호PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF PRE-TREATMENT SCC-AG LEVEL IN PATIENTS WITH CERVICAL CANCER김병기, 김태중, 박진영, 배덕수, 안정주, 이유영, 이정원, 최철훈대한산부인과학회 · Obstetrics & Gynecology Science2011 · 제54권 제08호Prognostic Model for Survival and Recurrence in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028)김문홍, 김윤환, 백이선, 서동훈, 성석주, 송은섭, 이종민, 이철민, 임명철, 최철훈대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제1호Prognostic Value of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes after Radical Surgery Followed by Adjuvant Treatment in High-Risk Cervical Cancer권진이, 김기동, 김용범, 김인아, 김재성, 노재홍, 엄근용대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (30건)