본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

External Validation of the Long Short-Term Memory Artificial Neural Network-Based SCaP Survival Calculator for Prediction of Prostate Cancer Survival

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose Decision-making for treatment of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) is complex due to the multiple initial treatment modalities available. We aimed to externally validate the SCaP (Severance Study Group of Prostate Cancer) Survival Calculator that incorporates a long short-term memory artificial neural network (ANN) model to estimate survival outcomes of PCa according to initial treatment modality. Materials and Methods The validation cohort consisted of clinicopathological data of 4,415 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven PCa between April 2005 and November 2018 at three institutions. Area under the curves (AUCs) and time-to-event calibration plots were utilized to determine the predictive accuracies of the SCaP Survival Calculator in terms of progression to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC)–free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results Excellent discrimination was observed for CRPC-free survival, CSS, and OS outcomes, with AUCs of 0.962, 0.944, and 0.884 for 5-year outcomes and 0.959, 0.928, and 0.854 for 10-year outcomes, respectively. The AUC values were higher for all survival endpoints compared to those of the development cohort. Calibration plots showed that predicted probabilities of 5-year survival endpoints had concordance comparable to those of the observed frequencies. However, calibration performances declined for 10-year predictions with an overall underestimation. Conclusion The SCaP Survival Calculator is a reliable and useful tool for determining the optimal initial treatment modality and for guiding survival predictions for patients with newly diagnosed PCa. Further modifications in the ANN model incorporating cases with more extended follow-up periods are warranted to improve the ANN model for long-term predictions.

Abstract

Purpose Decision-making for treatment of newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) is complex due to the multiple initial treatment modalities available. We aimed to externally validate the SCaP (Severance Study Group of Prostate Cancer) Survival Calculator that incorporates a long short-term memory artificial neural network (ANN) model to estimate survival outcomes of PCa according to initial treatment modality. Materials and Methods The validation cohort consisted of clinicopathological data of 4,415 patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven PCa between April 2005 and November 2018 at three institutions. Area under the curves (AUCs) and time-to-event calibration plots were utilized to determine the predictive accuracies of the SCaP Survival Calculator in terms of progression to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC)–free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Results Excellent discrimination was observed for CRPC-free survival, CSS, and OS outcomes, with AUCs of 0.962, 0.944, and 0.884 for 5-year outcomes and 0.959, 0.928, and 0.854 for 10-year outcomes, respectively. The AUC values were higher for all survival endpoints compared to those of the development cohort. Calibration plots showed that predicted probabilities of 5-year survival endpoints had concordance comparable to those of the observed frequencies. However, calibration performances declined for 10-year predictions with an overall underestimation. Conclusion The SCaP Survival Calculator is a reliable and useful tool for determining the optimal initial treatment modality and for guiding survival predictions for patients with newly diagnosed PCa. Further modifications in the ANN model incorporating cases with more extended follow-up periods are warranted to improve the ANN model for long-term predictions.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Ha Chung B, "The incidence, mortality, and risk factors of prostate cancer in Asian men", Prostate Int, 7, pp.1~8 (2019)
  2. Mohler JL, "Prostate cancer, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology", J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 17, pp.479~505 (2019)
  3. Sanda MG, "Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA", ASTRO, J Urol, pp.2018, 199[DOI]
  4. Martinez-Gonzalez NA, "Shared decision-making for prostate cancer screening and treatment : a systematic review of randomised controlled trials", Swiss Med Wkly, 148, pp.w14584~ (2018)
  5. Cuypers M, "The impact of prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment decision-making on health-related quality of life before treatment onset", Support Care Cancer, 26, pp.1297~1304 (2018)
  6. Mottet N, "EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: Screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent", Eur Urol, 71, pp.618~629 (2017)
  7. Spelt L, "Artificial neural networks : a method for prediction of survival following liver resection for colorectal cancer metastases", Eur J Surg Oncol, 39, pp.648~654 (2013)
  8. Peng JH, "A scoring system based on artificial neural network for predicting 10-year survival in stage II A colon cancer patients after radical surgery", Oncotarget, 7, pp.22939~22947 (2016)
  9. Kourou K, "Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction", Comput Struct Biotechnol J, 13, pp.8~17 (2015)
  10. Koo KC, "Long short-term memory artificial neural network model for prediction of prostate cancer survival outcomes according to initial treatment strategy : development of an online decisionmaking support system", World J Urol, 38, pp.2469~2476 (2020)
  11. "Natural resources biometrics. Chapter 7: Correlation and simple linear regression" (2014)[URL]
  12. van Kleef JJ, "External validation of the Dutch SOURCE survival prediction model in Belgian metastatic oesophageal and gastric cancer patients", Cancers(Basel), 12, pp.834~ (2020)
  13. D’Amico AV, "Determinants of prostate cancer-specific survival after radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer", J Clin Oncol, 20, pp.4567~4573 (2002)
  14. Cooperberg MR, "Risk assessment for prostate cancer metastasis and mortality at the time of diagnosis", J Natl Cancer Inst, 101, pp.878~887 (2009)
  15. Oh SE, "Prediction of overall survival and novel classification of patients with gastric cancer using the survival recurrent network", Ann Surg Oncol, 25, pp.1153~1159 (2018)
  16. Obrzut B, "Prediction of 5-year overall survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy using computational intelligence methods", BMC Cancer, 17, pp.840~ (2017)
  17. Qiao G, "Artificial neural networking model for the prediction of post-hepatectomy survival of patients with early hepatocellular carcinoma", J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 29, pp.2014~2020 (2014)
  18. Snow PB, "Artificial neural networks in clinical urology", Urology, 54, pp.787~790 (1999)
  19. Steyerberg EW, "Assessing the performance of prediction models : a framework for traditional and novel measures", Epidemiology, 21, pp.128~138 (2010)
  20. Collins GS, "Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model : a resampling study", Stat Med, 35, pp.214~226 (2016)

관련 논문AI추천

Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification Based on A Nonlinear Transformation Stacking Learning StrategyChunguang Yang, Guoping Xu, Hanshuo Xing, Peiyan Wu, Wenbo Song, Xinglong Wu, Xinyu Cao, Yan Jiang, Yin Fang, Zhenghao Liu대한배뇨장애요실금학회 · International Neurourology Journal2024 · 제28권 제1호Re-stratification of Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer According to the NCCN Guidelines among Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy: An Analysis Based on the K-CaP Registry구교철, 김청수, 나군호, 변석수, 이광석, 이지열, 이현무, 정병하, 최인영, 홍성규, 홍준혁대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제1호한국 전립샘암 데이터베이스를 활용한 근치적 전립샘절제술 후 생화학적 재발 예측김청수, 박용현, 변석수, 서성일, 유성혜, 이선정, 정창욱, 최문주, 최인영, 홍준혁한국보건정보통계학회 · 보건정보통계학회지2019 · 제44권 제1호Cancer-Specific Mortality among Korean Men with Localized or Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radiotherapy: A Multi-center Study Using Propensity Scoring and Competing Risk Regression Analyses구교철, 김선일, 김세중, 나군호, 방우진, 이승환, 정병하, 조성용, 조진선, 홍성준대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제1호Bilateral Seminal Vesicle Invasion as a Strong Prognostic Indicator in T3b Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy: A Comprehensive, Multi-Center, Long-Term Follow-Up Study곽철, 변석수, 서준교, 안한종, 이상철, 전성수, 전황균, 정인갑, 정창욱대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2024 · 제56권 제3호Impact of Early Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis고동훈, 나군호, 박재원, 장원식, 최영득, 함원식, 홍성준연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2018 · 제59권 제5호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (29건)