본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Life-Sustaining Treatment States in Korean Cancer Patients After Enforcement of Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose In Korea, the “Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life” was enacted on February 4, 2018. This study was conducted to analyze the current state of life-sustaining treatment decisions based on National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data after the law came into force. Materials and Methods The data of 173,028 cancer deaths were extracted from NHIS qualification data between November 2015 and January 2019. Results The number of cancer deaths complied with the law process was 14,438 of 54,635 cases (26.4%). The rate of patient self-determination was 49.0%. The patients complying with the law process have used a hospice center more frequently (28% vs. 14%). However, the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was similar between the patients who complied with and without the law process (ICU admission, 23% vs. 21%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis in the comparative analysis before and after the enforcement of the law and the analysis according to the compliance with the law. The patients who complied with the law process received cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a lower rate. Conclusion The law has positive effects on the rate of life-sustaining treatment decision by patient’s determination. However, there was no sufficient effect on the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, which could protect the patient from unnecessary or harmful interventions.

Abstract

Purpose In Korea, the “Act on Hospice and Palliative Care and Decisions on Life-sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life” was enacted on February 4, 2018. This study was conducted to analyze the current state of life-sustaining treatment decisions based on National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) data after the law came into force. Materials and Methods The data of 173,028 cancer deaths were extracted from NHIS qualification data between November 2015 and January 2019. Results The number of cancer deaths complied with the law process was 14,438 of 54,635 cases (26.4%). The rate of patient self-determination was 49.0%. The patients complying with the law process have used a hospice center more frequently (28% vs. 14%). However, the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission was similar between the patients who complied with and without the law process (ICU admission, 23% vs. 21%). There was no difference in the proportion of patients who had undergone mechanical ventilation and hemodialysis in the comparative analysis before and after the enforcement of the law and the analysis according to the compliance with the law. The patients who complied with the law process received cardiopulmonary resuscitation at a lower rate. Conclusion The law has positive effects on the rate of life-sustaining treatment decision by patient’s determination. However, there was no sufficient effect on the withholding or withdrawing of life-sustaining treatment, which could protect the patient from unnecessary or harmful interventions.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Miljkovic MD, "From the Euthanasia Society to physician orders for life-sustaining treatment : end-oflife care in the United States", Cancer J, 19, pp.438~443 (2013)
  2. Tanaka M, "Forgoing life-sustaining treatment : a comparative analysis of regulations in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and England", BMC Med Ethics, 21, pp.99~ (2020)
  3. 최경석, "Legal and Ethical Issues Regarding End-of-Life Care in Korea", Journal of Asian Sociology, 45(1), pp.151~164 (2016), 사회발전연구소[DOI]
  4. 김명희, "연명의료결정법의 문제점 및 개선 방안", Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, 21(1), pp.1~8 (2018), 한국호스피스완화의료학회[DOI]
  5. "Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or at the End of Life" (2016)[URL]
  6. 진솔, "End-of-Life Care Practice in Dying Patients after Enforcement of Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment For Patients in Hospice and Palliative Care or at the End of Life : A Single Center Experience", Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care, 23(2), pp.93~102 (2020), 한국호스피스완화의료학회[DOI]
  7. 김정선, "Implication of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act on End-of-Life Care for Korean Terminal Patients", Cancer Research and Treatment, 52(3), pp.917~924 (2020), 대한암학회[DOI]
  8. Quan H, "Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data", Med Care, 43, pp.1130~1139 (2005)
  9. "Monthly statistics" (2020)[URL]
  10. 안호정, "Feasibility Study of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients with Terminal Cancer", Cancer Research and Treatment, 51(4), pp.1632~1638 (2019), 대한암학회
  11. Park HY, "Attitudes of the general Public, cancer patients, family caregivers, and physicians toward advance care planning : a nationwide survey before the enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act", J Pain Symptom Manage, 57, pp.774~782 (2019)
  12. Kim DY, "Do-not-resuscitate orders for terminal patients with cancer in teaching hospitals of Korea", J Palliat Med, 10, pp.1153~1158 (2007)
  13. Oh DY, "CPR or DNR? End-of-life decision in Korean cancer patients : a single center’s experience", Support Care Cancer, 14, pp.103~108 (2006)
  14. 백선경, "The Association between End-of-Life Care and the Time Interval between Provision of a Do-Not-Resuscitate Consent and Death in Cancer Patients in Korea", Cancer Research and Treatment, 49(2), pp.502~508 (2017), 대한암학회
  15. Becker G, "End-of-life care in hospital : current practice and potentials for improvement", J Pain Symptom Manage, 33, pp.711~719 (2007)
  16. Celso BG, "The triad that matters : palliative medicine, code status, and health care costs", Am J Hosp Palliat Care, 27, pp.398~401 (2010)
  17. 최연악, "Cancer Treatment near the End-of-Life Becomes More Aggressive: Changes in Trend during 10 Years at a Single Institute", Cancer Research and Treatment, 47(4), pp.555~563 (2015), 대한암학회[DOI]
  18. Yun YH, "Chemotherapy use and associated factors among cancer patients near the end of life", Oncology, 72, pp.164~171 (2007)
  19. Keam B, "Aggressiveness of cancer-care near the end-of-life in Korea", Jpn J Clin Oncol, 38, pp.381~386 (2008)
  20. The 2019 annual report on the life-sustaining treatment decision system, , Korea National Institute for Bioethics Policy, ~ (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

The Situation of Life-Sustaining Treatment One Year After Enforcement of the Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End-of-Life in Korea: Data of National Agency for Management of Life-Sustaining Treatment권정혜, 김유정, 김화정, 류혜원, 백선경, 백수진, 원영웅, 이하연대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2021 · 제53권 제4호Current Status and Cardinal Features of Patient Autonomy after Enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act in Korea권정혜, 김도연, 김유정, 김화정, 류혜원, 백선경, 원영웅, 이하연대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2021 · 제53권 제4호Analysis of Cancer Patient Decision-Making and Health Service Utilization after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act in Korea김달용, 김도연, 서세영, 신성준, 유신혜, 이현정, 임지연, 임채만, Dae Seog Heo, Min Sun Kim대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2022 · 제54권 제1호Implication of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act on End-of-Life Care for Korean Terminal Patients김민선, 김범석, 김예진, 김정선, 박혜윤, 유신혜, 최원호, 허대석, 홍진의대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제3호Factors Affecting Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions and Changes in Clinical Practice after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision (LST) Act: A Tertiary Hospital Experience in Korea구회정, 김선영, 김정은, 김태원, 서세영, 양윤정, 엄성범, 윤혜원, 장윤정, 허진원대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2025 · 제57권 제1호Preparation and Practice of the Necessary Documents in Hospital for the “Act on Decision of Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End-of-Life”권정혜, 김유정, 김화정, 류혜원, 백선경, 백수진, 원영웅, 이하연대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2021 · 제53권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (30건)