본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Predictors of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases (ALNM) in a Korean Population with T1-2 Breast Carcinoma: Triple Negative Breast Cancer has a High Incidence of ALNM Irrespective of the Tumor Size

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose :We estimated the likelihood of breast cancer patients having axillary lymph node metastases (ALNM) based on a variety of clinical and pathologic factors. Materials and Methods :Three hundred sixty-one breast cancer patients without distant metastases and who underwent breast conserving surgery and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (level I and II) or modified radical mastectomy (MRM) were identified, and we retrospectively reviewed their pathology records and treatment charts. Results :Positive axillary lymph nodes were detected in 104 patients for an overall incidence of 28.8%: 2 patients (5%) with T1a tumor, 5 (9.2%) with T1b tumor, 24 (21.8%) with T1c tumor and 73 (44.2%) with T2 tumor. On the multivariate analysis, an increased tumor size (adjusted OR=11.87, p=0.02), the presence of lymphovascular invasion (adjusted OR=7.41, p<0.01), a triple negative profile (ER/PR-, Her2-) (adjusted OR=2.09, p=0.04) and a palpable mass at the time of diagnosis (adjusted OR=2.31, p=0.03) were all significant independent factors for positive ALNM. Conclusion :In our study, the tumor size, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, a triple negative profile and a palpable mass were the independent predictive factors for ALNM. The tumor size was the strongest predictor of ALNM. Thus, the exact estimation of the extent of tumor is necessary for clinicians to optimize the patients’ care. Patients with a triple negative profile have a high incidence of ALNM irrespective of the tumor size.

Abstract

Purpose :We estimated the likelihood of breast cancer patients having axillary lymph node metastases (ALNM) based on a variety of clinical and pathologic factors. Materials and Methods :Three hundred sixty-one breast cancer patients without distant metastases and who underwent breast conserving surgery and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (level I and II) or modified radical mastectomy (MRM) were identified, and we retrospectively reviewed their pathology records and treatment charts. Results :Positive axillary lymph nodes were detected in 104 patients for an overall incidence of 28.8%: 2 patients (5%) with T1a tumor, 5 (9.2%) with T1b tumor, 24 (21.8%) with T1c tumor and 73 (44.2%) with T2 tumor. On the multivariate analysis, an increased tumor size (adjusted OR=11.87, p=0.02), the presence of lymphovascular invasion (adjusted OR=7.41, p<0.01), a triple negative profile (ER/PR-, Her2-) (adjusted OR=2.09, p=0.04) and a palpable mass at the time of diagnosis (adjusted OR=2.31, p=0.03) were all significant independent factors for positive ALNM. Conclusion :In our study, the tumor size, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, a triple negative profile and a palpable mass were the independent predictive factors for ALNM. The tumor size was the strongest predictor of ALNM. Thus, the exact estimation of the extent of tumor is necessary for clinicians to optimize the patients’ care. Patients with a triple negative profile have a high incidence of ALNM irrespective of the tumor size.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Rosen PP, "Factors influencing prognosis in nodenegative breast carcinoma: analysis of 767 T1N0M0", T2N0M0 patients with long-term follow-up, 1993, pp.11, 2090~2100
  2. Fisher B, "Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer: an NASABP update", Cancer, 52, pp.1551~1557 (1983)
  3. Consensus statement treatment of early-stage breast cancer, "National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel", J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 11, pp.1~5 (1992)
  4. "NIH Consensus Conference, Treatment of early-stage breast cancer", JAMA, 265, pp.391~395 (1991)
  5. Davies GC, "Assessment of axillary lymph node status", Ann Surg, 192, pp.148~151 (1980)
  6. Kang HS, "The predictors of axillary node metastasis in 2 cm or less breast cancer univariate and multivaritate analysis", J Korean Breast Cancer Soc, 2, pp.7~13 (1999)
  7. Nemoto T, "Management and survival of female breast cancer: results of a national survey by the American college of surgeons", Cancer, 45, pp.2917~2924 (1980)
  8. Ernst MF, "Early and late morbidity associated with axillary levels I–III dissection in breast cancer", J Surg Oncol, 79, pp.151~155 (2002)
  9. Mansel RE, "Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial", J Natl Cancer Inst, 98, pp.599~609 (2006)
  10. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Breast. 6th ed, "AJCC Cancer Staging Manual", pp.2002, Frederick LG
  11. Tinnemans JG, "Treatment and survival of female patients with nonpalpable breast carcinoma", Ann Surg, 209, pp.249~253 (1989)
  12. Silverstein MJ, "Predicting axillary nodal positivity in 2282 patients with breast carcinoma", World J Surg, 25, pp.767~772 (2001)
  13. Kambouris AA, "Axillary node metastases in relation to size and location of breast cancers: analysis of 147 patients", Am Surg, 62, pp.519~524 (1996)
  14. Fein DA, "Identification of women with T1-T2 breast cancer at low risk of positive axillary nodes", Surg Oncol, 65, pp.34~39 (1997)
  15. Cetinas SK, "Factors influencing axillary node metastasis in breast cancer", Tumori, 92, pp.416~422 (2006)
  16. Jonjic N, "Predicting sentinel lymph node metastases in infiltrating breast carcinoma with vascular invasion", Int J Surg Pathol, 14, pp.306~311 (2006)
  17. "Eur J Surg Oncol", 2002, 490~500
  18. Colleoni M, "Prognostic role of the extent of peritumoral vascular invasion in operable breast cancer", Ann Oncol, 18, pp.1632~1640 (2007)
  19. Carey LA, "Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study", JAMA, 295, pp.2492~2502 (2006)
  20. Onitilo AA, "Breast cancer subtypes based on ER", PR and Her2 expression: comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival, 2009, pp.7, 4~13
  21. Bader AA, "T1 breast cancer: identification of patients at low risk of axillary lymph node metastases", Breast Cancer Res Treat, 76, pp.11~17 (2002)
  22. Chua B, "Frequency and predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in invasive breast cancer", ANZ J Surg, 71, pp.723~728 (2001)
  23. Martelli G, "A randomized trial comparing axillary dissection to no axillary dissection in older patients with T1N0 breast cancer: results after 5 years of follow-up", Ann Surg, 242, pp.1~6 (2005)
  24. 손병호, "임상적으로 림프절 전이를 보이지 않는 유방암 환자에서 방사성 동위원소를 이용한 감시림프절 생검의 성적", Journal of Breast Cancer, 10(2), pp.141~146 (2007), 한국유방암학회
  25. Harden SP, "Predicting axillary lymph node metastases in patients with T1 infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast", Breast, 10, pp.155~159 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

림프절 전이가 있는 작은 크기의 유방암 환자에서 종양 크기와 환자 예후 및 예후 관련 인자들과의 연관성김석원, 김이삭, 남석진, 박성민, 배수연, 백현준, 유재민, 유종한, 이세경, 이정언, 한홍석한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2016 · 제4권 제2호Prognostic Factors in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy박민호, 윤정한, 조진성, Min Jaegal, Shin Jae Kang, Young Jae Ryu한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2019 · 제7권 제1호유방암 환자에서 림프계 침범에 따른 임상병리학적 특성김성용, 이종은, 조동희, 한선욱, 허남훈, 홍성훈한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2020 · 제8권 제1호Risk Factors for a False-Negative Result of Sentinel Node Biopsy in Patients with Clinically Node-Negative Breast Cancer정준, 김승일, 박종태, 안성귀, 양반석, 이승아, 이학민, 이학우대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2018 · 제50권 제3호Are the Outcomes of Breast Conservation Surgery Inferior to Those of Mastectomy in Patients with Stage II-IIIA Triple-Negative Breast Cancer?김지연, 김현열, 이석원, Chang Shin Jung, Dong Il Kim, Hyun-June Paik, Seok-Kyung Kang, Seungju Lee, Youngtae Bae, Youn Joo Jung한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2021 · 제9권 제2호림프절 양성 유방암의 선행항암화학요법 후 잔여 액와부 림프절 전이의 예측 인자강진구, 박호용, 이한용한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2016 · 제4권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)