본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Novel Prognostic Nomogram for Predicting Risks of Distant Failure in Patients with Invasive Breast Cancer Following Postoperative Adjuvant Radiotherapy

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose This study aimed to identify predictors for distant metastatic behavior and build a related prognostic nomogram in breast cancer. Materials and Methods A total of 1,181 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer between 2003 and 2011 were analyzed. To predict the probability of distant metastasis, a nomogram was constructed based on prognostic factors identified using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results The 7-year overall survival and 5-year post-progression survival of locoregional versus distant recurrence groups were 67.6% versus 39.1% (p=0.027) and 54.2% versus 33.5% (p=0.043), respectively. Patients who developed distant metastasis showed early and late mortality risk peaks within 3 and after 5 years of follow-up, respectively, but a broad and low risk increment was observed in other patients with locoregional relapse. In multivariate analysis of distant metastasis-free interval, age ( 45 years vs. < 45 years), molecular subtypes (luminal A vs. luminal B, human epidermal growth receptor 2, and triple negative), T category (T1 vs. T2-3 and T4), and N category (N0 vs. N1 and N2-3) were independently associated (p < 0.05 for all). Regarding the significant factors, a well-validated nomogram was established (concordance index, 0.812). The risk score level of patients with initial brain failure was higher than those of non-brain sites (p=0.029). Conclusion The nomogram could be useful for predicting the individual probability of distant recurrence in breast cancer. In high-risk patients based on the risk scores, more aggressive systemic therapy and closer surveillance for metastatic failure should be considered.

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to identify predictors for distant metastatic behavior and build a related prognostic nomogram in breast cancer. Materials and Methods A total of 1,181 patients with non-metastatic breast cancer between 2003 and 2011 were analyzed. To predict the probability of distant metastasis, a nomogram was constructed based on prognostic factors identified using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results The 7-year overall survival and 5-year post-progression survival of locoregional versus distant recurrence groups were 67.6% versus 39.1% (p=0.027) and 54.2% versus 33.5% (p=0.043), respectively. Patients who developed distant metastasis showed early and late mortality risk peaks within 3 and after 5 years of follow-up, respectively, but a broad and low risk increment was observed in other patients with locoregional relapse. In multivariate analysis of distant metastasis-free interval, age ( 45 years vs. < 45 years), molecular subtypes (luminal A vs. luminal B, human epidermal growth receptor 2, and triple negative), T category (T1 vs. T2-3 and T4), and N category (N0 vs. N1 and N2-3) were independently associated (p < 0.05 for all). Regarding the significant factors, a well-validated nomogram was established (concordance index, 0.812). The risk score level of patients with initial brain failure was higher than those of non-brain sites (p=0.029). Conclusion The nomogram could be useful for predicting the individual probability of distant recurrence in breast cancer. In high-risk patients based on the risk scores, more aggressive systemic therapy and closer surveillance for metastatic failure should be considered.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Siegel RL, "Cancer statistics, 2016", CA Cancer J Clin, 66, pp.7~30 (2016)
  2. [URL]
  3. "Adjuvant therapy for early and locally advanced breast cancer" (2017)[URL]
  4. Wu SG, "The effect of distant metastases sites on survival in de novo stage- IV breast cancer: a SEER database analysis", Tumour Biol, 39 (2017)
  5. Wu Q, "Breast cancer subtypes predict the preferential site of distant metastases: a SEER based study", Oncotarget, 8, pp.27990~27996 (2017)
  6. Weigelt B, "Breast cancer metastasis: markers and models", Nat Rev Cancer, 5, pp.591~602 (2005)
  7. Le MG, "Prognostic factors for death after an isolated local recurrence in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma", Cancer, 94, pp.2813~2820 (2002)
  8. Lim YJ, "Failure patterns according to molecular subtype in patients with invasive breast cancer following postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy: long-term outcomes in contemporary clinical practice", Breast Cancer Res Treat, 163, pp.555~563 (2017)
  9. Goldhirsch A, "Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013", Ann Oncol, 24, pp.2206~2223 (2013)
  10. Akaike H, "A new look at the statistical model identification", IEEE Trans Autom Control, 19, pp.716~723 (1974)
  11. Cheng YC, "Improvement of survival and prospect of cure in patients with metastatic breast cancer", Breast Cancer, 19, pp.191~199 (2012)
  12. Balachandran VP, "Nomograms in oncology: more than meets the eye", Lancet Oncol, 16, pp.e173~e180 (2015)
  13. Haffty BG, "Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer", J Clin Oncol, 24, pp.5652~5657 (2006)
  14. Laurberg T, "Long-term age-dependent failure pattern after breastconserving therapy or mastectomy among Danish lymphnode- negative breast cancer patients", Radiother Oncol, 120, pp.98~106 (2016)
  15. Anders CK, "Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression", J Clin Oncol, 26, pp.3324~3330 (2008)
  16. Partridge AH, "Subtype-dependent relationship between young age at diagnosis and breast cancer survival", J Clin Oncol, 34, pp.3308~3314 (2016)
  17. van de Water W, "Association between age at diagnosis and disease-specific mortality among postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer", JAMA, 307, pp.590~597 (2012)
  18. Purushotham A, "Age at diagnosis and distant metastasis in breast cancer: a surprising inverse relationship", Eur J Cancer, 50, pp.1697~1705 (2014)
  19. Myers CE, "Immunity, cancer and aging: lessons from mouse models", Aging Dis, 2, pp.512~523 (2011)
  20. Labat-Robert J, "The effect of cell-matrix interactions and aging on the malignant process", Adv Cancer Res, 98, pp.221~259 (2007)
  21. Hancke K, "Standard treatment of female patients with breast cancer decreases substantially for women aged 70 years and older: a German clinical cohort study", Ann Oncol, 21, pp.748~753 (2010)
  22. Arriagada R, "Predicting distant dissemination in patients with early breast cancer", Acta Oncol, 47, pp.1113~1121 (2008)
  23. Ali HR, "Genome-driven integrated classification of breast cancer validated in over 7,500 samples", Genome Biol, 15, pp.431~ (2014)
  24. Ciriello G, "The molecular diversity of Luminal A breast tumors", Breast Cancer Res Treat, 141, pp.409~420 (2013)
  25. Lin NU, "CNS metastases in breast cancer", J Clin Oncol, 22, pp.3608~3617 (2004)
  26. Niwinska A, "Breast cancer brain metastases: differences in survival depending on biological subtype, RPA RTOG prognostic class and systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT)", Ann Oncol, 21, pp.942~948 (2010)
  27. Kennecke H, "Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes", J Clin Oncol, 28, pp.3271~3277 (2010)
  28. Almendro V, "Genetic and phenotypic diversity in breast tumor metastases", Cancer Res, 74, pp.1338~1348 (2014)
  29. Fasching PA, "The role of genetic breast cancer susceptibility variants as prognostic factors", Hum Mol Genet, 21, pp.3926~3939 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

Which Patients Might Benefit from Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients with T1-2 Tumor and 1-3 Axillary Lymph Nodes Metastasis?공문규, 홍성언대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2013 · 제45권 제2호Incorporating Risk Factors to Identify the Indication of Post-mastectomy Radiotherapy in N1 Breast Cancer Treated with Optimal Systemic Therapy: A Multicenter Analysis in Korea (KROG 14-23)박원, 김규보, 김수지, 김연주, 김용배, 김자영, 김진호, 김진희, 박경란, 박혜진, 신경환, 신현수, 안승도, 이선영, 정배권대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2017 · 제49권 제3호Effect of Time Interval between Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy on Outcomes of Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Adjuvant Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide Followed by Taxane강한성, 고현강, 김규보, 김석원, 노동영, 노정실, 박인혜, 신경환, 이경훈, 이근숙, 이시연, 이은숙, 임석아, 정소연, 지의규, 하성환, 한원식대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2016 · 제48권 제2호Impact of Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Breast Cancer Patients According to Pathologic Nodal Status after Modern Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy김도욱, 김인아, 김진호, 신경환, 장지현대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2023 · 제55권 제2호Omitting Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Hormone Receptor–Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Old Age: A Propensity Score Matched SEER Analysis김규보, 김이준, 신경환대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제1호Prognostic Impact of Elective Supraclavicular Nodal Irradiation for Patients with N1 Breast Cancer after Lumpectomy and Anthracycline Plus Taxane-Based Chemotherapy (KROG 1418): A Multicenter Case-Controlled Study박원, 강한성, 김규보, 김연주, 김용배, 김정수, 김진희, 김해영, 박경란, 박인혜, 신경환, 안성자, 위찬우, 유정일, 이근석, 이은숙, 이종훈, 이형식, 전미선, 차지혜, 최두호, 허승재대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2017 · 제49권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (39건)