Efficacy and Safety of Afatinib for EGFR-mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Compared with Gefitinib or Erlotinib
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose We tried to evaluate whether there are any specific features in treatment outcomes of firstline afatinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared with gefitinib or erlotinib. Materials and Methods We analyzed patients treated with first-line afatinib, gefitinib, or erlotinib for advanced EGFRmutant NSCLC at Samsung Medical Center between 2014 and 2016. Results In total, 467 patients received first-line afatinib (n=165), gefitinib (n=230), or erlotinib (n=72). Afatinib was used more often in patients with tumors harboring deletion in exon 19 (Del19), whereas the gefitinib group had more elderly, females, and never smokers. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time for afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib was 19.1 months, 13.7 months, and 14.0 months, respectively (p=0.001). The superior PFS of afatinib was more remarkable in subgroups of Del19 or uncommon EGFR mutations. Overall toxicity profiles of the three drugs were comparable, though more grade 3 or 4 toxicities were detected in afatinib (7.3%) compared with gefitinib (2.6%) or erlotinib (1.8%). The common grade 3 or 4 toxicities of afatinib included diarrhea (3.0%), paronychia (2.4%), and skin rash (1.8%). Dose modification was more frequently required in patients treated with afatinib (112/165, 68%), compared with gefitinib (5/230, 2%) and erlotinib (4/72, 6%). Interestingly, however, dose reduction in the afatinib group did not impair its efficacy in terms of PFS (dose reduction vs. no reduction group, 23.5 months vs. 12.4 months). Conclusion First-line afatinib showed satisfactory efficacy data and manageable toxicity profiles.
Abstract
Purpose We tried to evaluate whether there are any specific features in treatment outcomes of firstline afatinib in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), compared with gefitinib or erlotinib. Materials and Methods We analyzed patients treated with first-line afatinib, gefitinib, or erlotinib for advanced EGFRmutant NSCLC at Samsung Medical Center between 2014 and 2016. Results In total, 467 patients received first-line afatinib (n=165), gefitinib (n=230), or erlotinib (n=72). Afatinib was used more often in patients with tumors harboring deletion in exon 19 (Del19), whereas the gefitinib group had more elderly, females, and never smokers. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time for afatinib, gefitinib, and erlotinib was 19.1 months, 13.7 months, and 14.0 months, respectively (p=0.001). The superior PFS of afatinib was more remarkable in subgroups of Del19 or uncommon EGFR mutations. Overall toxicity profiles of the three drugs were comparable, though more grade 3 or 4 toxicities were detected in afatinib (7.3%) compared with gefitinib (2.6%) or erlotinib (1.8%). The common grade 3 or 4 toxicities of afatinib included diarrhea (3.0%), paronychia (2.4%), and skin rash (1.8%). Dose modification was more frequently required in patients treated with afatinib (112/165, 68%), compared with gefitinib (5/230, 2%) and erlotinib (4/72, 6%). Interestingly, however, dose reduction in the afatinib group did not impair its efficacy in terms of PFS (dose reduction vs. no reduction group, 23.5 months vs. 12.4 months). Conclusion First-line afatinib showed satisfactory efficacy data and manageable toxicity profiles.
참고문헌 (19)
- Torre LA, "Global cancer statistics, 2012", CA Cancer J Clin, 65, pp.87~108 (2015)
- Mok TS, "Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma", N Engl J Med, 361, pp.947~957 (2009)
- Zhou C, "Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-smallcell lung cancer(OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802) : a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study", Lancet Oncol, 12, pp.735~742 (2011)
- Li D, "BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR", HER2inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models, 2008, pp.27, 4702~4711
- Sequist LV, "Phase III study of afatinib or cisplatin plus pemetrexed in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR mutations", J Clin Oncol, 31, pp.3327~3334 (2013)
- Wu YL, "Afatinib versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine for first-line treatment of Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring EGFR mutations(LUX-Lung 6) : an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial", Lancet Oncol, 15, pp.213~222 (2014)
- Urata Y, "Randomized phase III study comparing gefitinib with erlotinib in patients with previously treated advanced lung adenocarcinoma : WJOG 5108L", J Clin Oncol, 34, pp.3248~3257 (2016)
- Park K, "Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer(LUXLung 7) : a phase 2B, open-label, randomised controlled trial", Lancet Oncol, 17, pp.577~589 (2016)
- Chen KL, "Comparison of skin toxic effects associated with gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib treatment for non-small cell lung cancer", JAMA Dermatol, 152, pp.340~342 (2016)
- Yang JC, "Afatinib versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma(LUX-Lung 3and LUX-Lung 6) : analysis of overall survival data from two randomised, phase 3 trials", Lancet Oncol, 16, pp.141~151 (2015)
- Mok T, "Dacomitinib versus gefitinib for the first-line treatment of advanced EGFR mutation positive non-small cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomized, open-label phase III trial", J Clin Oncol, 35(Suppl), pp.LBA9007~ (2017)
- Jackman DM, "Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib", Clin Cancer Res, 12, pp.3908~3914 (2006)
- Lynch TJ, "Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of nonsmall-cell lung cancer to gefitinib", N Engl J Med, 350, pp.2129~2139 (2004)
- Paez JG, "EGFR mutations in lung cancer : correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy", Science, 304, pp.1497~1500 (2004)
- Wu JY, "Effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on uncommon E709X epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer", Onco Targets Ther, 9, pp.6137~6145 (2016)
- Baek JH, "Efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFRmutated non-small cell lung cancer except both exon 19deletion and exon 21 L858R : a retrospective analysis in Korea", Lung Cancer, 87, pp.148~154 (2015)
- Shen YC, "Comparing the effects of afatinib with gefitinib or Erlotinib in patients with advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma harboring non-classical epidermal growth factor receptor mutations", Lung Cancer, 110, pp.56~62 (2017)
- Yang JC, "Activity of afatinib in uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations: findings from three trials of afatinib in Egfr mutation-positive lung cancer", J Thorac Oncol, 8(Suppl 2), pp.S141~ (2013)
- Liu CY, "The efficacy of 40 mg versus dose de-escalation to less than 40 mg of afatinib(Giotrif)as the first-line therapy for patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma harboring favorable epidermal growth factor mutations", Oncotarget, 8, pp.97602~97612 (2017)
