Inter-observer Reproducibility in the Pathologic Diagnosis of Gastric Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Early Carcinoma in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Specimens: A Multi-center Study
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose The diagnostic criteria of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN) are controversial across the world. We investigated how many discrepancies occur in the pathologic diagnosis of IEN and early gastric carcinoma in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) specimens, and evaluated the reasons of the discordance. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 1,202 ESD specimens that were originally diagnosed as gastric IEN and early carcinoma at 12 institutions. Results The final consensus diagnosis of carcinoma were 756 cases, which were originally 692 carcinomas (91.5%), 43 high-grade dysplasias (5.7%), 20 low-grade dysplasias (2.6%), and 1 others (0.1%), respectively. High- and low-grade dysplasia were finally made in 63 and 342 cases, respectively. The diagnostic concordance with the consensus diagnosis was the highest for carcinoma (91.5%), followed by low-grade dysplasia (86.3%), others (63.4%) and high-grade dysplasia (50.8%). The general kappa value was 0.83, indicating excellent concordance. The kappa values of individual institutions ranged from 0.74 to 1 and correlated with the proportion of carcinoma cases. The cases revised to a final diagnosis of carcinoma exhibited both architectural abnormalities and cytologic atypia. The main differential points between low- and high-grade dysplasias were the glandular distribution and glandular shape. Additional features such as the glandular axis, surface maturation, nuclear stratification, and nuclear polarity were also important. Conclusion The overall concordance of the diagnosis of gastric IEN and early carcinoma in ESD specimens was excellent. It correlated with the proportion of carcinoma cases, demonstrating that the diagnostic criteria for carcinoma are more reproducible than those for dysplasia.
Abstract
Purpose The diagnostic criteria of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN) are controversial across the world. We investigated how many discrepancies occur in the pathologic diagnosis of IEN and early gastric carcinoma in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) specimens, and evaluated the reasons of the discordance. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 1,202 ESD specimens that were originally diagnosed as gastric IEN and early carcinoma at 12 institutions. Results The final consensus diagnosis of carcinoma were 756 cases, which were originally 692 carcinomas (91.5%), 43 high-grade dysplasias (5.7%), 20 low-grade dysplasias (2.6%), and 1 others (0.1%), respectively. High- and low-grade dysplasia were finally made in 63 and 342 cases, respectively. The diagnostic concordance with the consensus diagnosis was the highest for carcinoma (91.5%), followed by low-grade dysplasia (86.3%), others (63.4%) and high-grade dysplasia (50.8%). The general kappa value was 0.83, indicating excellent concordance. The kappa values of individual institutions ranged from 0.74 to 1 and correlated with the proportion of carcinoma cases. The cases revised to a final diagnosis of carcinoma exhibited both architectural abnormalities and cytologic atypia. The main differential points between low- and high-grade dysplasias were the glandular distribution and glandular shape. Additional features such as the glandular axis, surface maturation, nuclear stratification, and nuclear polarity were also important. Conclusion The overall concordance of the diagnosis of gastric IEN and early carcinoma in ESD specimens was excellent. It correlated with the proportion of carcinoma cases, demonstrating that the diagnostic criteria for carcinoma are more reproducible than those for dysplasia.
참고문헌 (18)
- Schlemper RJ, "The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia", Gut, 47, pp.251~255 (2000)
- Dixon MF, "Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia : Vienna revisited", Gut, 51, pp.130~131 (2002)
- Kim JM, "Pre-and post-ESD discrepancies in clinicopathologic criteria in early gastric cancer : the NECA-Korea ESD for Early Gastric Cancer Prospective Study(N-Keep)", Gastric Cancer, 19, pp.1104~1113 (2016)
- Benjamini Y, "Controlling the false discovery rate : a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing", J R Stat Soc Series B, 57, pp.289~300 (1995)
- Goldstein NS, "Gastric epithelial dysplasia and adenoma : historical review and histological criteria for grading", Hum Pathol, 28, pp.127~133 (1997)
- Riddell RH, "Problems arising from eastern and western classification systems for gastrointestinal dysplasia and carcinoma: are they resolvable?", Histopathology, 33, pp.197~202 (1998)
- Schlemper RJ, "Review of histological classifications of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia : differences in diagnosis of early carcinomas between Japanese and Western pathologists", J Gastroenterol, 36, pp.445~456 (2001)
- Schlemper RJ, "Differences in diagnostic criteria for gastric carcinoma between Japanese and western pathologists", Lancet, 349, pp.1725~1729 (1997)
- Rugge M, "Gastric dysplasia : the Padova international classification", Am J Surg Pathol, 24, pp.167~176 (2000)
- Kasamatsu E, "Reproducibility of histopathologic diagnosis of precursor lesions of gastric carcinoma in three Latin American countries", Salud Publica Mex, 52, pp.386~390 (2010)
- Ahn S, "Practical points in gastric pathology", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 140, pp.397~405 (2016)
- Zhao G, "How commonly is the diagnosis of gastric low-grade dysplasia upgraded following endoscopic resection? A meta-analysis", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0132699~ (2015)
- Kim JM, "Diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia : Dilemma for Korean pathologists", World J Gastroenterol, 17, pp.2602~2610 (2011)
- Palli D, "Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer", Br J Cancer, 63, pp.765~768 (1991)
- Ryoji Kushima, "Interobserver Variation in the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia and Carcinoma between Two Pathologists in Japan and Korea", Journal of Gastric Cancer, 11(3), pp.141~145 (2011), 대한위암학회
- Bosman FT, "WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system", pp.10~14 (2010), IARC Press
- Jass JR, "A classification of gastric dysplasia", Histopathology, 7, pp.181~193 (1983)
- 김우호, "위암 병리보고서 기재사항 표준화", Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine, 39(2), pp.106~113 (2005), 대한병리학회