Current Evidence for Spinal Opioid Selection in Postoperative Pain
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Spinal opioid administration is an excellent option to separate the desirable analgesic effects of opioids from their expected dose-limiting side effects to improve postoperative analgesia. Therefore, physicians must better identify either specific opioids or adequate doses and routes of administration that result in a mainly spinal site of action rather than a cerebral analgesic one. Methods: The purpose of this topical review is to describe current available clinical evidence to determine what opioids reach high enough concentrations to produce spinally selective analgesia when given by epidural or intrathecal routes and also to make recommendations regarding their rational and safety use for the best management of postoperative pain. To this end, a search of Medline/Embase was conducted to identify all articles published up to December 2013 on this topic. Results: Recent advances in spinal opioid bioavailability, based on both animals and humans trials support the theory that spinal opioid bioavailability is inversely proportional to the drug lipid solubility, which is higher in hydrophilic opioids like morphine, diamorphine and hydromorphone than lipophilic ones like alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil. Conclusions: Results obtained from meta-analyses of RTCs is considered to be the ‘highest’ level and support their use. However, it´s a fact that meta-analyses based on studies about treatment of postoperative pain should explore clinical surgery heterogeneity to improve patient’s outcome. This observation forces physicians to use of a specific procedure surgical-based practical guideline. A vigilance protocol is also needed to achieve a good postoperative analgesia in terms of efficacy and security.
Abstract
Background: Spinal opioid administration is an excellent option to separate the desirable analgesic effects of opioids from their expected dose-limiting side effects to improve postoperative analgesia. Therefore, physicians must better identify either specific opioids or adequate doses and routes of administration that result in a mainly spinal site of action rather than a cerebral analgesic one. Methods: The purpose of this topical review is to describe current available clinical evidence to determine what opioids reach high enough concentrations to produce spinally selective analgesia when given by epidural or intrathecal routes and also to make recommendations regarding their rational and safety use for the best management of postoperative pain. To this end, a search of Medline/Embase was conducted to identify all articles published up to December 2013 on this topic. Results: Recent advances in spinal opioid bioavailability, based on both animals and humans trials support the theory that spinal opioid bioavailability is inversely proportional to the drug lipid solubility, which is higher in hydrophilic opioids like morphine, diamorphine and hydromorphone than lipophilic ones like alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil. Conclusions: Results obtained from meta-analyses of RTCs is considered to be the ‘highest’ level and support their use. However, it´s a fact that meta-analyses based on studies about treatment of postoperative pain should explore clinical surgery heterogeneity to improve patient’s outcome. This observation forces physicians to use of a specific procedure surgical-based practical guideline. A vigilance protocol is also needed to achieve a good postoperative analgesia in terms of efficacy and security.
참고문헌 (40)
- Macintyre PE, "The scientific evidence for acute pain treatment", Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 23, pp.623~628 (2010)
- Espitalier F, "Heterogeneity in meta-analyses of treatment of acute postoperative pain: a review", Br J Anaesth, 111, pp.897~906 (2013)
- Kehlet H, "PROSPECT: evidence-based, procedurespecific postoperative pain management", Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 21, pp.149~159 (2007)
- Wang JK, "Pain relief by intrathecally applied morphine in man", Anesthesiology, 50, pp.149~151 (1979)
- Behar M, "Epidural morphine in treatment of pain", Lancet, 1, pp.527~529 (1979)
- Bernards CM, "Understanding the physiology and pharmacology of epidural and intrathecal opioids", Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 16, pp.489~505 (2002)
- Bernards CM, "Recent insights into the pharmacokinetics of spinal opioids and the relevance to opioid selection", Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 17, pp.441~447 (2004)
- Bujedo BM, "Spinal opioid bioavailability in postoperative pain", Pain Pract, 14, pp.350~364 (2014)
- Angst MS, "Lumbar epidural morphine in humans and supraspinal analgesia to experimental heat pain", Anesthesiology, 92, pp.312~324 (2000)
- Sultan P, "Neuraxial morphine and respiratory depression : finding the right balance", Drugs, 71, pp.1807~1819 (2011)
- Gourlay GK, "Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in lumbar and cervical CSF following lumbar epidural and intravenous administration", Pain, 38, pp.253~259 (1989)
- Eisenach JC, "Cephalad movement of morphine and fentanyl in humans after intrathecal injection", Anesthesiology, 99, pp.166~173 (2003)
- Ummenhofer WC, "Comparative spinal distribution and clearance kinetics of intrathecally administered morphine, fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil", Anesthesiology, 92, pp.739~753 (2000)
- Fernandez Robles CR, "Pain and genetics", Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 25, pp.444~449 (2012)
- Bujedo BM, "A review of epidural and intrathecal opioids used in the management of postoperative pain", J Opioid Manag, 8, pp.177~192 (2012)
- Smith HS, "Combination opioid analgesics", Pain Physician, 11, pp.201~214 (2008)
- Pöpping DM, "Opioids added to local anesthetics for single-shot intrathecal anesthesia in patients undergoing minor surgery : a meta-analysis of randomized trials", Pain, 153, pp.784~793 (2012)
- Pöpping DM, "Combination of a reduced dose of an intrathecal local anesthetic with a small dose of an opioid : a meta-analysis of randomized trials", Pain, 154, pp.1383~1390 (2013)
- van Dongen RT, "Intrathecal coadministration of bupivacaine diminishes morphine dose progression during long-term intrathecal infusion in cancer patients", Clin J Pain, 15, pp.166~172 (1999)
- Mercadante S, "Intrathecal treatment in cancer patients unresponsive to multiple trials of systemic opioids", Clin J Pain, 23, pp.793~798 (2007)
- de Leon-Casasola OA, "227 surgical cancer patients", Anesthesiology, 81, pp.368~375 (1994)
- Mugabure Bujedo B, "A clinical approach to neuraxial morphine for the treatment of postoperative pain", Pain Res Treat, 2012, pp.612145~ (2012)
- de Leon-Casasola OA, "Postoperative epidural opioid analgesia: what are the choices?", Anesth Analg, 83, pp.867~875 (1996)
- Gambling D, "A comparison of Depodur, a novel, single-dose extendedrelease epidural morphine, with standard epidural morphine for pain relief after lower abdominal surgery", Anesth Analg, 100, pp.1065~1074 (2005)
- Hartrick CT, "Extended-release epidural morphine(DepoDur) : review and safety analysis", Expert Rev Neurother, 8, pp.1641~1648 (2008)
- Mhuircheartaigh RJ, "Analysis of individual patient data from clinical trials : epidural morphine for postoperative pain", Br J Anaesth, 103, pp.874~881 (2009)
- Sumida S, "Meta-analysis of the effect of extended-release epidural morphine versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on respiratory depression", J Opioid Manag, 5, pp.301~305 (2009)
- Meylan N, "Benefit and risk of intrathecal morphine without local anaesthetic in patients undergoing major surgery : meta-analysis of randomized trials", Br J Anaesth, 102, pp.156~167 (2009)
- Remy C, "Effects of acetaminophen on morphine side-effects and consumption after major surgery : meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials", Br J Anaesth, 94, pp.505~513 (2005)
- Gehling M, "Risks and side-effects of intrathecal morphine combined with spinal anaesthesia : a meta-analysis", Anaesthesia, 64, pp.643~651 (2009)
- Rathmell JP, "The role of intrathecal drugs in the treatment of acute pain", Anesth Analg, 101, pp.S30~S43 (2005)
- Hamber EA, "Intrathecal lipophilic opioids as adjuncts to surgical spinal anesthesia", Reg Anesth Pain Med, 24, pp.255~263 (1999)
- Ginosar Y, "The site of action of epidural fentanyl in humans : the difference between infusion and bolus administration", Anesth Analg, 97, pp.1428~1438 (2003)
- Niemi G, "Thoracic epidural fentanyl has spinal cord analgesic effects", Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 57, pp.1089~1091 (2013)
- Wu CL, "Efficacy of postoperative patientcontrolled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids : a meta-analysis", Anesthesiology, 103, pp.1079~1088 (2005)
- Niemi G, "Adrenaline markedly improves thoracic epidural analgesia produced by a low-dose infusion of bupivacaine, fentanyl and adrenaline after major surgery. A randomised, double-blind, cross-over study with and without adrenaline", Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 42, pp.897~909 (1998)
- Niemi G, "Epidural fentanyl markedly improves thoracic epidural analgesia in a low-dose infusion of bupivacaine, adrenaline and fentanyl. A randomized, doubleblind crossover study with and without fentanyl", Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 45, pp.221~232 (2001)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management, "Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management", Anesthesiology, 116, pp.248~273 (2012)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuraxial Opioids, "Practice guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of respiratory depression associated with neuraxial opioid administration", Anesthesiology, 110, pp.218~230 (2009)
- Bujedo BM, "Recommendations for spinal opioids clinical practice in the management of postoperative pain", J Anesthesiol Clin Sci, 2, pp.28~ (2013)