The evaluation of healing patterns in surgically created circumferential gap defects around dental implants according to implant surface, defect width and defect morphology
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting healing patterns of surgically created circumferential gap defects around implants in dogs. Materials and Methods: In four mongrel dogs, all mandibular premolars were extracted. After 8 weeks of healing periods, implants were submerged. According to the surface treatment, turned surface was designated as a group A and rough surface as a group B. In each dog, surgical defects on the left side were made with a customized tapered step drill and on the right with a customized paralleled drill. Groups were also divided according to the width of the coronal gaps: 1.0mm, 1.5mm, or 2.0mm. The dogs were sacrificed following 8 weeks and the specimens were analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically. Results: During the postoperative period, healing was uneventful and implants were well-maintained. As the size of the coronal gap was increased, the amount of bone-to-implant contact was decreased. The bone healing was greater in rough surface implants compared to the turned ones. About the defect morphology, tapered shape showed much bone healing and direct bone to implant contact even in the smooth surface implants. Conclusion: Healing of the circumferential defect around dental implant is influenced by the implant surface, defect width and the morphology of the defect. When using rough surface implants, circumferential gap defects within 2 mm do not need any kinds of regenerative procedures and the healing appeared to be faster in the tapered defect morphology than the paralleled one. (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:385-394)
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors affecting healing patterns of surgically created circumferential gap defects around implants in dogs. Materials and Methods: In four mongrel dogs, all mandibular premolars were extracted. After 8 weeks of healing periods, implants were submerged. According to the surface treatment, turned surface was designated as a group A and rough surface as a group B. In each dog, surgical defects on the left side were made with a customized tapered step drill and on the right with a customized paralleled drill. Groups were also divided according to the width of the coronal gaps: 1.0mm, 1.5mm, or 2.0mm. The dogs were sacrificed following 8 weeks and the specimens were analyzed histologically and histomorphometrically. Results: During the postoperative period, healing was uneventful and implants were well-maintained. As the size of the coronal gap was increased, the amount of bone-to-implant contact was decreased. The bone healing was greater in rough surface implants compared to the turned ones. About the defect morphology, tapered shape showed much bone healing and direct bone to implant contact even in the smooth surface implants. Conclusion: Healing of the circumferential defect around dental implant is influenced by the implant surface, defect width and the morphology of the defect. When using rough surface implants, circumferential gap defects within 2 mm do not need any kinds of regenerative procedures and the healing appeared to be faster in the tapered defect morphology than the paralleled one. (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:385-394)
참고문헌 (27)
- Wilson T, "Classification of and therapy for areas of deficient bony housing prior to dental implant placement", Int J Periodont Rest Dent, 13, pp.451~459 (1993)
- Lazzara RJ, "Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages", Int J Periodont Rest Dent, 9, pp.333~343 (1989)
- Werbitt M, "The immediate implant: Bone preservation and bone regeneration", Int J Periodont Rest Dent, 12, pp.206~217 (1992)
- Gelb DA, "Immediate implant surgery: Three-year retrospective evaluation of 50 consecutive cases", Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants, 8, pp.388~399 (1993)
- Lang N, "Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regeneration: Rationale, clinical procedures and 30-month results", Clin Oral Implants Res, 5, pp.154~163 (1994)
- Becker W, "The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: A prospective multicenter study", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.31~40 (1994)
- Becker BE, "A prospective clinical trial of endosseous screw-shaped implants placed at the time of tooth extraction without augmentation", J Periodontol, 69, pp.920~926 (1998)
- Watzek G, "Immediate implants and delayed implantation for complete restoration of the jaw following extraction of all residual teeth: A retrospective study comparing different types of serial immediate implantation", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.561~567 (1995)
- Denissen HW, "Anatomic consideration for preventive implantation", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 82, pp.191~196 (1993)
- Becker W, "Guided tissue regeneration for implants placed into extraction sockets and for implant dehiscences: surgical techniques and case report", Int J Periodont Rest Dent, 10, pp.376~391 (1990)
- Gotfredsen K, "Evaluation of guided bone generation around implants placed into fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in dogs", J Oral Maxillofac Sur, 51, pp.879~884 (1993)
- Goldstein M, "The palatal advanced flap: a pedicle flap for primary coverage of immediately placed implants", Clin Oral Imp Res, 13, pp.644~650 (2002)
- Rosenquist B, "Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: Implant survival", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.205~209 (1996)
- Schwarz AD, "Placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: 4-7 years retrospective evaluation of 95 immediate implants", J Periodontol, 68, pp.1110~1116 (1997)
- Schwartz AD, "The clinical effectiveness of implants placed immediately into fresh extraction sites of molar teeth", J Periodontol, 71, pp.839~844 (2000)
- Carlsson L, "Implant fixation improved by close fit: Cylindrical implant-bone interface studied in rabbits", Acta Orthop Scand, 59, pp.272~ (1998)
- Knox R, "Histologic evaluation of dental endosseous implants placed in surgically created extraction defects", Int J Periodont Rest Dent, 11, pp.364~375 (1991)
- Thomas G, "Implants placed in immediate extraction sites: A report of histologic and histomorphometric analyses of human biopsies", Int J Oral Maxillofacial implants, 13, pp.333~341 (1998)
- Akimoto K, "Evaluation of titanium implants placed into simulated extraction sockets: A study in dogs", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.351~360 (1999)
- Botticelli D, "Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites", J Clin Periodontol, 31, pp.820~828 (2004)
- Botticelli D, "Appositional bone formation in marginal defects at implants", Clin Oral Imp Res, 14, pp.1~9 (2003)
- Botticelli D, "Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects: An experimental study in the dog", J Clin Periodontol, 32, pp.448~455 (2005)
- Botticelli D, "Resolution of bone defects of varying dimension and configuration in the marginal portion of the peri-implant bone: An experimental study in the dog", J Clin Periodontol, 31, pp.309~317 (2004)
- Botticelli D, "The influence of a biomaterial on the closure of marginal hard tissue defect adjacent to implants: An experimental study in the dog", Clin Oral Implants Res, 15, pp.285~292 (2004)
- Caudill RF, "Histologic analysis of the osseointegration of endosseous implants in simulated extraction sockets with and without e-PTFE barriers. Part I. Preliminary findings", Int J Periodont Rest Dent, 11, pp.207~215 (1991)
- Davies JE, "Mechanisms of endosseous integration", Int J Prosthodont, 11, pp.391~401 (1998)
- Davies JE, "Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing", J Dent Edu, 8, pp.932~949 (2003)