The top 10 most-cited articles on the management of fractured instruments: a bibliometric analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this research was to identify the top 10 most-cited articles on the management of fractured or broken instruments and to perform a bibliometric analysis thereof. Materials and Methods: Published articles related to fractured instruments were screened from online databases, such as Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect, and highly cited papers, with at least 50 citations since publication, were identified. The most-cited articles were selected and analysed with regard to publication title, authorship, the journal of publication, year, institution, country of origin, article type, and number of citations. Results: The top 10 most-cited articles were from various journals. Most were published in the Journal of Endodontics , followed by the International Endodontic Journal , and Dental Traumatology . The leading countries were Australia, Israel, Switzerland, the USA, and Germany, and the leading institution was the University of Melbourne. The majority of articles among the top 10 articles were clinical research studies ( n = 8), followed by a basic research article and a non-systematic review article. Conclusions: This bibliometric analysis revealed interesting information about scientific progress in endodontics regarding fractured instruments. Overall, clinical research studies and basic research articles published in high-impact endodontic journals had the highest citation rates.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this research was to identify the top 10 most-cited articles on the management of fractured or broken instruments and to perform a bibliometric analysis thereof. Materials and Methods: Published articles related to fractured instruments were screened from online databases, such as Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect, and highly cited papers, with at least 50 citations since publication, were identified. The most-cited articles were selected and analysed with regard to publication title, authorship, the journal of publication, year, institution, country of origin, article type, and number of citations. Results: The top 10 most-cited articles were from various journals. Most were published in the Journal of Endodontics , followed by the International Endodontic Journal , and Dental Traumatology . The leading countries were Australia, Israel, Switzerland, the USA, and Germany, and the leading institution was the University of Melbourne. The majority of articles among the top 10 articles were clinical research studies ( n = 8), followed by a basic research article and a non-systematic review article. Conclusions: This bibliometric analysis revealed interesting information about scientific progress in endodontics regarding fractured instruments. Overall, clinical research studies and basic research articles published in high-impact endodontic journals had the highest citation rates.
참고문헌 (19)
- Torabinejad M, "Principles and practice of endodontics", pp.310~330 (2002), W.B. Saunders Company
- Gambarini G, "Cyclic fatigue of ProFile rotary instruments after prolonged clinical use", Int Endod J, 34, pp.386~389 (2001)
- Parashos P, "Questionnaire survey on the use of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments by Australian dentists", Int Endod J, 37, pp.249~259 (2004)
- Al-Fouzan KS, "Incidence of rotary ProFile instrument fracture and the potential for bypassing in vivo", Int Endod J, 36, pp.864~867 (2003)
- Ankrum MT, "K3 Endo, ProTaper, and ProFile systems : breakage and distortion in severely curved roots of molars", J Endod, 30, pp.234~237 (2004)
- De Bellis N, "Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics", pp.417~ (2009), Scarecrow Press
- Mishra L, "A bibliometric analysis of two PubMed-indexed high-impact factor endodontic journals : a comparison of India with other countries", Indian J Dent, 7, pp.121~125 (2016)
- Bellini C, "Cited or read?", Lancet, 379, pp.314~ (2012)
- Feijoo JF, "The 100 most cited articles in dentistry", Clin Oral Investig, 18, pp.699~706 (2014)
- Fardi A, "Top-cited articles in endodontic journals", J Endod, 37, pp.1183~1190 (2011)
- Haapasalo M, "Level of evidence in endodontics: what does it mean?", Endod Topics, 34, pp.30~41 (2016)
- Parashos P, "Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences", J Endod, 32, pp.1031~1043 (2006)
- Spili P, "The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment", J Endod, 31, pp.845~850 (2005)
- Fors UG, "A method for the removal of broken endodontic instruments from root canals", J Endod, 9, pp.156~159 (1983)
- Nagai O, "Ultrasonic removal of broken instruments in root canals", Int Endod J, 19, pp.298~304 (1986)
- Cujé J, "The outcome of retained instrument removal in a specialist practice", Int Endod J, 43, pp.545~554 (2010)
- Fors UG, "Endodontic treatment of root canals obstructed by foreign objects", Int Endod J, 19, pp.2~10 (1986)
- Syed Mukhtar-Un- Nisar Andrabi, "Retrieval of a separated nickel-titanium instrument using a modified 18-guage needle and cyanoacrylate glue: a case report", Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, 38(2), pp.93~97 (2013), 대한치과보존학회[DOI]
- Gencoglu N, "Comparison of the different techniques to remove fractured endodontic instruments from root canal systems", Eur J Dent, 3, pp.90~95 (2009)