본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Implication and Influence of Multigene Panel Testing with Genetic Counseling in Korean Patients with BRCA1/2 Mutation-Negative Breast Cancer

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical implication of multigene panel testing of beyond BRCA genes in Korean patients with BRCA1/2 mutation-negative breast cancer. Materials and methods: Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 700 BRCA1/2 mutation-negative breast cancer patients received comprehensive multigene panel testing and genetic counseling. Among them, 347 patients completed a questionnaire about cancer worry, genetic knowledge, and preference for the method of genetic tests during pre- and post-genetic test counseling. The frequency of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPV) were analyzed. Results: At least one PV/LPV of 26 genes was found in 76 out of 700 patients (10.9 %). The rate for PV/LPV was 3.4% for high-risk genes (17 PALB2, 6 TP53, and 1 PTEN). PV/LPVs of clinical actionable genes for breast cancer management, high-risk genes and other moderate-risk genes such as ATM, BARD1, BRIP, CHEK2, NF1, and RAD51D, were observed in 7.4%. Patients who completed the questionnaire showed decreased concerns about the risk of additional cancer development (average score, 4.21 to 3.94; p < 0.001), influence on mood (3.27 to 3.13; p < 0.001), influence on daily functioning (3.03 to 2.94; p=0.006); and increased knowledge about hereditary cancer syndrome (66.9 to 68.8; p=0.025) in post-test genetic counseling. High cancer worry scales (CWSs) were associated with age ≤ 40 years and the identification of PV/LPV. Low CWSs were related to the satisfaction of the counselee. Conclusion: Comprehensive multigene panel test with genetic counseling is clinically applicable. It should be based on interpretable genetic information, consideration of potential psychological consequences, and proper preventive strategies.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical implication of multigene panel testing of beyond BRCA genes in Korean patients with BRCA1/2 mutation-negative breast cancer. Materials and methods: Between 2016 and 2019, a total of 700 BRCA1/2 mutation-negative breast cancer patients received comprehensive multigene panel testing and genetic counseling. Among them, 347 patients completed a questionnaire about cancer worry, genetic knowledge, and preference for the method of genetic tests during pre- and post-genetic test counseling. The frequency of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPV) were analyzed. Results: At least one PV/LPV of 26 genes was found in 76 out of 700 patients (10.9 %). The rate for PV/LPV was 3.4% for high-risk genes (17 PALB2, 6 TP53, and 1 PTEN). PV/LPVs of clinical actionable genes for breast cancer management, high-risk genes and other moderate-risk genes such as ATM, BARD1, BRIP, CHEK2, NF1, and RAD51D, were observed in 7.4%. Patients who completed the questionnaire showed decreased concerns about the risk of additional cancer development (average score, 4.21 to 3.94; p < 0.001), influence on mood (3.27 to 3.13; p < 0.001), influence on daily functioning (3.03 to 2.94; p=0.006); and increased knowledge about hereditary cancer syndrome (66.9 to 68.8; p=0.025) in post-test genetic counseling. High cancer worry scales (CWSs) were associated with age ≤ 40 years and the identification of PV/LPV. Low CWSs were related to the satisfaction of the counselee. Conclusion: Comprehensive multigene panel test with genetic counseling is clinically applicable. It should be based on interpretable genetic information, consideration of potential psychological consequences, and proper preventive strategies.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. Kuchenbaecker KB, "Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers", JAMA, 317, pp.2402~2416 (2017)
  2. Chen S, "Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance", J Clin Oncol, 25, pp.1329~1333 (2007)
  3. Mavaddat N, "Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers : results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE", J Natl Cancer Inst, 105, pp.812~822 (2013)
  4. Paluch-Shimon S, "Prevention and screening in BRCA mutation carriers and other breast", ovarian hereditary cancer syndromes : ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for cancer prevention and screening, 2016, pp.27, v103~v110
  5. US Preventive Services Task Force, "Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer : US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement", JAMA, 322, pp.652~665 (2019)
  6. Tung NM, "Management of hereditary breast cancer : American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology guideline", J Clin Oncol, 38, pp.2080~2106 (2020)
  7. Daly MB, "Genetic", familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, and pancreatic, version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, 2021, pp.19, 77~102
  8. Katz SJ, "Association of germline genetic test type and results with patient cancer worry after diagnosis of breast cancer", JCO Precis Oncol, 2018, pp.PO.18.0022~ (2018)
  9. Obeid EI, "Multigene panel testing and breast cancer risk : is it time to scale down?", JAMA Oncol, 3, pp.1176~1177 (2017)
  10. Plagnol V, "A robust model for read count data in exome sequencing experiments and implications for copy number variant calling", Bioinformatics, 28, pp.2747~2754 (2012)
  11. Richards S, "Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants : a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology", Genet Med, 17, pp.405~424 (2015)
  12. Plon SE, "Sequence variant classification and reporting : recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results", Hum Mutat, 29, pp.1282~1291 (2008)
  13. Desmond A, "Clinical actionability of multigene panel testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk assessment", JAMA Oncol, 1, pp.943~951 (2015)
  14. Foulkes WD, "Inherited susceptibility to common cancers", N Engl J Med, 359, pp.2143~2153 (2008)
  15. Shiovitz S, "Genetics of breast cancer : a topic in evolution", Ann Oncol, 26, pp.1291~1299 (2015)
  16. Tung N, "Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations", Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 13, pp.581~588 (2016)
  17. Lerman C, "Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility", J Clin Oncol, 12, pp.843~850 (1994)
  18. Choi E, "Relationship between cancer worry and stages of adoption for breast cancer screening among Korean women", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0132351~ (2015)
  19. Anh Thi Ngoc Tran, "Impact of Awareness of Breast Density on Perceived Risk, Worry, and Intentions for Future Breast Cancer Screening among Korean Women", Cancer Research and Treatment, 53(1), pp.55~64 (2021), 대한암학회[DOI]
  20. Erblich J, "Development and validation of a Breast Cancer Genetic Counseling Knowledge Questionnaire", Patient Educ Couns, 56, pp.182~191 (2005)
  21. 최경숙, "국내 간호사의 유전성 유방암에 대한 지식정도 조사연구", 한국간호교육학회지, 12(2), pp.272~179 (2006), 한국간호교육학회
  22. 이상희, "장액성 난소암 환자의 유전성 난소암에 대한 지식 및 불안정도", 여성건강간호학회지, 25(4), pp.365~378 (2019), 한국여성건강간호학회[DOI]
  23. Kurian AW, "Clinical evaluation of a multiple-gene sequencing panel for hereditary cancer risk assessment", J Clin Oncol, 32, pp.2001~2009 (2014)
  24. Castera L, "Landscape of pathogenic variations in a panel of 34 genes and cancer risk estimation from 5131 HBOC families", Genet Med, 20, pp.1677~1686 (2018)
  25. Couch FJ, "Associations between cancer predisposition testing panel genes and breast cancer", JAMA Oncol, 3, pp.1190~1196 (2017)
  26. Hauke J, "Gene panel testing of 5589 BRCA1", 2-negative index patients with breast cancer in a routine diagnostic setting : results of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, 2018, pp.7, 1349~1358
  27. Hu C, "A population-based study of genes previously implicated in breast cancer", N Engl J Med, 384, pp.440~451 (2021)
  28. Zhou J, "Spectrum of PALB2 germline mutations and characteristics of PALB2-related breast cancer : screening of 16, 501 unselected patients with breast cancer and 5890 controls by next-generation sequ-encing", Cancer, 126, pp.3202~3208 (2020)
  29. Li FP, "A cancer family syndrome in twenty-four kindreds", Cancer Res, 48, pp.5358~5362 (1988)
  30. Birch JM, "Prevalence and diversity of constitutional mutations in the p53 gene among 21 Li-Fraumeni families", Cancer Res, 54, pp.1298~1304 (1994)
  31. Eeles RA, "Germline mutations in the TP53 gene", Cancer Surv, 25, pp.101~124 (1995)
  32. Bougeard G, "Revisiting Li-Fraumeni syndrome from TP53 mutation carriers", J Clin Oncol, 33, pp.2345~2352 (2015)
  33. Braithwaite D, "Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis", J Natl Cancer Inst, 96, pp.122~133 (2004)
  34. Richter S, "Variants of unknown significance in BRCA testing: impact on risk perception, worry, prevention and counseling", Ann Oncol, 24(Suppl 8), pp.viii69~viii74 (2013)
  35. Mighton C, "Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Genet Med, 23, pp.22~33 (2021)
  36. Fraser FC, "Genetic counseling", Am J Hum Genet, 26, pp.636~659 (1974)
  37. Biesecker BB, "Goals of genetic counseling", Clin Genet, 60, pp.323~330 (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

Detection of Germline Mutations in Breast Cancer Patients with Clinical Features of Hereditary Cancer Syndrome Using a Multi-Gene Panel Test공선영, 김룡남, 노동영, 문형곤, 박보영, 박찬이, 신희철, 유태경, 윤경아, 이은숙, 이은신, 이한별, 한원식대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2020 · 제52권 제3호Clinicopathological Characterization of Double Heterozygosity for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Variants in Korean Breast Cancer Patients권원경, 김석원, 김종원, 남석진, 방윤주, 유재민, 유종한, 이세경, 이정언, 채병주대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2022 · 제54권 제3호Clinical Validity of Next-Generation Sequencing Multi-Gene Panel Testing for Detecting Pathogenic Variants in Patients With Hereditary Breast-Ovarian Cancer Syndrome김명신, Eunhee Han, Gun Dong Lee, Hyojin Chae, Jaeeun Yoo, Jee Hae Kim, Seung Nam Lee, Yonggoo Kim대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2020 · 제40권 제2호Clinically Significant Unclassified Variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Genes among Korean Breast Cancer Patients공선영, 박보영, 양문정, 윤경아, 이병일, 이은숙대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2017 · 제49권 제3호Different Patterns of Risk Reducing Decisions in Affected or Unaffected BRCA Pathogenic Variant Carriers강한성, 강혁조, 공선영, 박보람, 박보영, 박상윤, 박수진, 이시연, 이은경, 이은숙, 임명철, 정소연, 주정남, 한재홍대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제1호Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of BRCA1/2 Mutation in Korean Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Study and Literature Review권병수, 김기형, 변정미, 서동수, 신경화, 이태화, 이현주, 정대훈대한암학회 · Cancer Research and Treatment2019 · 제51권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (30건)